Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Linear

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Linear no task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Linear covers Fast, real-time sync.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Linear actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Linear
- Fast, real-time sync
- Keyboard-first design
- Automatic issue tracking
- Cycles (sprints)
- Projects & milestones
- Custom workflows
- API & webhooks
- Built-in roadmaps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Linear
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Linear
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Linear
Linear
- Issue management and triage, converting customer feedback into prioritized issuesnot authentik
- Strategic planning via initiatives, roadmaps, and PRDs from idea to launchnot authentik
- Agent-assisted development, with agents drafting docs and submitting pull requestsnot authentik
- Code review with structural diffs for human and agent outputnot authentik
- Progress monitoring via dashboards tracking cycle times and project healthnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Linear
- No task-level Gantt chart; Timeline view is available for projects only, not individual issues
- No native time-tracking or hour-logging feature
- No native Linux desktop app; official FAQ states it 'may come in the future but it's not on the roadmap for now'
- Free tier capped at 250 issues and 2 teams
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Linear
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited members
- 2 teams
- 250 issues
- Basic$10/month
- 5 teams
- Unlimited issues
- Unlimited file uploads
- Business$16/month
- Unlimited teams
- Private teams/guests
- Triage Intelligence
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- SAML/SCIM
- Granular admin controls
- Invoice/PO billing
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Linear if
- You need fast, real-time sync.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- You also want keyboard-first design.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Linear better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Linear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Linear?
- authentik starts at Free and Linear at Free.
- Does authentik or Linear run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Linear runs on Web, iOS, Android, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Linear is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Linear cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Linear covers Fast, real-time sync, Keyboard-first design, Automatic issue tracking, Cycles (sprints).
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Linear: How much does Linear cost?
Linear has a free tier supporting 2 teams and 250 issues. Paid plans start at $10 per user per month for Basic and $16 per user per month for Business. Annual billing is required for paid tiers.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Linear: What are the file upload limits on Linear?
The free tier is restricted to 10MB file uploads per team. Paid plans offer unlimited file uploads.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Linear: Does Linear offer an Enterprise plan?
Yes, Linear offers an Enterprise tier with custom pricing, annual billing required, SAML and SCIM support, granular admin controls, and priority support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs Asana
- authentik vs ClickUp
- authentik vs Figma
- authentik vs Kubernetes
- authentik vs Notion
- authentik vs Datadog
- authentik vs Monday.com
- authentik vs Terraform
- authentik vs Docker
- authentik vs Greenhouse
- authentik vs Google Chrome
- authentik vs Intercom
- authentik vs Mozilla Firefox
- authentik vs Okta
- authentik vs PostHog
- authentik vs Redis
- authentik vs Supabase
- authentik vs Amplitude
- Linear vs 1Password
- Linear vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Linear vs Norton 360
- Linear vs LastPass
- Linear vs Snyk
- Linear vs Bitwarden
- Linear vs Brave Browser
- Linear vs Clerk
- Linear vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Linear vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Linear vs Mullvad VPN
- Linear vs OneTrust
- Linear vs Private Internet Access
- Linear vs Proton Mail
- Linear vs Tuta
- Linear vs Akeyless
- Linear vs Doppler
- Linear vs Frontegg
- Linear vs Asana
- Linear vs ClickUp
- Linear vs Figma
- Linear vs Kubernetes
- Linear vs Notion
- Linear vs Datadog
- Linear vs Monday.com
- Linear vs Terraform
- Linear vs Docker
- Linear vs Greenhouse
- Linear vs Google Chrome
- Linear vs Intercom
- Linear vs Mozilla Firefox
- Linear vs Okta
- Linear vs PostHog
- Linear vs Redis
- Linear vs Supabase
- Linear vs Amplitude

