Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Google Chrome

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Google Chrome
Technology
Fast, secure browser built for the modern web
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Google Chrome multiple critical security vulnerabilities requiring frequent updates; 151 security flaws patched in Chrome 151 including 22 critical severities
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Google Chrome covers Fast page loading.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Google Chrome actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Google Chrome |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | Unknown |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Technology |
| Founded | Unknown | 2008 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Google Chrome
- Fast page loading
- Extensive extension library
- Cross-device sync
- Built-in security
- Developer tools
- Incognito mode
- Password manager
- Auto-updates
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Google Chrome
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Google Chrome
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Google Chrome
Google Chrome
- Web browsingnot authentik
- Web developmentnot authentik
- Online researchnot authentik
- Work applicationsnot authentik
- Entertainmentnot authentik
- Educationnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Google Chrome
- Multiple critical security vulnerabilities requiring frequent updates; 151 security flaws patched in Chrome 151 including 22 critical severities
- Frequent arbitrary code execution vulnerabilities allow remote attackers to execute code inside sandbox via crafted HTML pages
- Known use-after-free and integer overflow issues in V8 JavaScript engine and Codecs
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Google Chrome
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Google Chrome review.
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Google Chrome if
- You need fast page loading.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want extensive extension library.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Google Chrome better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Google Chrome at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Google Chrome?
- authentik starts at Free and Google Chrome at Free.
- Does authentik or Google Chrome run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Google Chrome runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Google Chrome is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Google Chrome cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Google Chrome covers Fast page loading, Extensive extension library, Cross-device sync, Built-in security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Google Chrome: Does Google Chrome have offline browsing capabilities?
Chrome can display cached versions of previously visited web pages offline. Chrome removed the experimental offline mode flag, but can automatically load cached pages when offline for sites you have visited before.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Google Chrome: Is Google Chrome free to use?
Yes. Google Chrome is completely free to download and use. There are no paid tiers or subscription requirements for standard browsing.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
More on Google Chrome
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs Asana
- authentik vs ClickUp
- authentik vs Linear
- authentik vs Figma
- authentik vs Kubernetes
- authentik vs Notion
- authentik vs Datadog
- authentik vs Monday.com
- authentik vs Terraform
- authentik vs Docker
- authentik vs Greenhouse
- authentik vs Intercom
- authentik vs Mozilla Firefox
- authentik vs Okta
- authentik vs PostHog
- authentik vs Redis
- authentik vs Supabase
- authentik vs Amplitude
- Google Chrome vs 1Password
- Google Chrome vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Google Chrome vs Norton 360
- Google Chrome vs LastPass
- Google Chrome vs Snyk
- Google Chrome vs Bitwarden
- Google Chrome vs Brave Browser
- Google Chrome vs Clerk
- Google Chrome vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Google Chrome vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Google Chrome vs Mullvad VPN
- Google Chrome vs OneTrust
- Google Chrome vs Private Internet Access
- Google Chrome vs Proton Mail
- Google Chrome vs Tuta
- Google Chrome vs Akeyless
- Google Chrome vs Doppler
- Google Chrome vs Frontegg
- Google Chrome vs Asana
- Google Chrome vs ClickUp
- Google Chrome vs Linear
- Google Chrome vs Figma
- Google Chrome vs Kubernetes
- Google Chrome vs Notion
- Google Chrome vs Datadog
- Google Chrome vs Monday.com
- Google Chrome vs Terraform
- Google Chrome vs Docker
- Google Chrome vs Greenhouse
- Google Chrome vs Intercom
- Google Chrome vs Mozilla Firefox
- Google Chrome vs Okta
- Google Chrome vs PostHog
- Google Chrome vs Redis
- Google Chrome vs Supabase
- Google Chrome vs Amplitude
