Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Supabase

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Supabase covers PostgreSQL database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Supabase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Supabase
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Supabase
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Supabase
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot authentik
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot authentik
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot authentik
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot authentik
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Supabase better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Supabase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Supabase?
- authentik starts at Free and Supabase at Free.
- Does authentik or Supabase run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Supabase is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Supabase cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Supabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Supabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs Asana
- authentik vs ClickUp
- authentik vs Linear
- authentik vs Figma
- authentik vs Kubernetes
- authentik vs Notion
- authentik vs Datadog
- authentik vs Monday.com
- authentik vs Terraform
- authentik vs Docker
- authentik vs Greenhouse
- authentik vs Google Chrome
- authentik vs Intercom
- authentik vs Mozilla Firefox
- authentik vs Okta
- authentik vs PostHog
- authentik vs Redis
- authentik vs Amplitude
- Supabase vs 1Password
- Supabase vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Supabase vs Norton 360
- Supabase vs LastPass
- Supabase vs Snyk
- Supabase vs Bitwarden
- Supabase vs Brave Browser
- Supabase vs Clerk
- Supabase vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Supabase vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Supabase vs Mullvad VPN
- Supabase vs OneTrust
- Supabase vs Private Internet Access
- Supabase vs Proton Mail
- Supabase vs Tuta
- Supabase vs Akeyless
- Supabase vs Doppler
- Supabase vs Frontegg
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Kubernetes
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs Datadog
- Supabase vs Monday.com
- Supabase vs Terraform
- Supabase vs Docker
- Supabase vs Greenhouse
- Supabase vs Google Chrome
- Supabase vs Intercom
- Supabase vs Mozilla Firefox
- Supabase vs Okta
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Amplitude

