Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Snyk

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Snyk free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Snyk covers Open source security.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Snyk actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Snyk
- Open source security
- Code security (SAST)
- Container security
- IaC security
- License compliance
- Fix PRs
- Priority scoring
- Developer IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Snyk
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Snyk
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Snyk
Snyk
- Vulnerability scanningnot authentik
- Application securitynot authentik
- Infrastructure as Code securitynot authentik
- Container securitynot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Snyk
- Free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
- Free and Team plans count only contributing developers making commits within 90 days; public contributions do not count
- Enterprise plan requires custom pricing and sales contact
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Snyk
Free- FreeFree
- SCA scanning
- SAST scanning
- IaC and Container scanning
- Team$25/month
- 1000 Code tests
- 100 projects
- Jira integration
- Ignite$105/month
- Unlimited tests
- Unlimited projects
- Custom security rules
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Zero-day prevention
- Unified AppSec control
- Full SDLC automation
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Snyk if
- You need open source security.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- You also want code security (sast).
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Snyk better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Snyk at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Snyk?
- authentik starts at Free and Snyk at Free.
- Does authentik or Snyk run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Snyk runs on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Snyk is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Snyk cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Snyk covers Open source security, Code security (SAST), Container security, IaC security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Snyk: How much does Snyk cost?
Snyk offers a free plan with limited tests, Team plan at $25/month per contributing developer, Ignite at $1260/year, and custom Enterprise pricing. Contributing developers are those who made commits to private repos within the last 90 days.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Snyk: What does Snyk's Team plan include?
The Team plan at $25/month includes 1000 Code tests, up to 100 projects, Jira integration, next business day support, and all features from the free plan including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Snyk: Is there a free version of Snyk?
Yes, Snyk offers a free plan with full platform access including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning. The free tier includes 200 Open Source tests, 100 Code tests, 300 IaC tests, 100 Container tests, and up to 5 projects.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Aikido
- authentik vs Trivy
- authentik vs Grype
- authentik vs Arnica
- authentik vs Falco
- authentik vs Socket
- authentik vs Endor Labs
- authentik vs Legit Security
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs HashiCorp Boundary
- authentik vs JumpCloud
- authentik vs McAfee Total Protection
- authentik vs NICE Actimize
- authentik vs Semgrep
- Snyk vs Authelia
- Snyk vs Logto
- Snyk vs Ory
- Snyk vs Passbolt
- Snyk vs Clerk
- Snyk vs 1Password
- Snyk vs Frontegg
- Snyk vs OWASP ZAP
- Snyk vs Infisical
- Snyk vs Chainguard
- Snyk vs Bitwarden
- Snyk vs Cosign
- Snyk vs CyberGhost VPN
- Snyk vs Dahua Technology
- Snyk vs Descope
- Snyk vs Drata
- Snyk vs DTiQ
- Snyk vs Ory Kratos
- Snyk vs Aikido
- Snyk vs Trivy
- Snyk vs Grype
- Snyk vs Arnica
- Snyk vs Falco
- Snyk vs Socket
- Snyk vs Endor Labs
- Snyk vs Legit Security
- Snyk vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Snyk vs Norton 360
- Snyk vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Snyk vs JumpCloud
- Snyk vs McAfee Total Protection
- Snyk vs NICE Actimize
- Snyk vs Semgrep

