Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Windscribe

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Windscribe
Cybersecurity
VPN and firewall service with a generous free data tier and a customizable Build-A-Plan option
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Windscribe free tier's 10GB cap still requires email confirmation and social sharing to unlock, unlike some no-strings-attached competitors.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Windscribe covers Firewall / default block.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Windscribe actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Windscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | freemium |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Windscribe
- Firewall / default block
- Unlimited simultaneous devices
- Build-A-Plan
- R.O.B.E.R.T. content blocker
- Static IP and port forwarding add-ons
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Windscribe
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Windscribe
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Windscribe
Windscribe
- Running a free VPN across unlimited personal devicesnot authentik
- Buying access to just a few specific server locations cheaplynot authentik
- Blocking ads and trackers at the DNS level while browsingnot authentik
- Preventing IP leaks with a default-block firewall rulenot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Windscribe
- Free tier's 10GB cap still requires email confirmation and social sharing to unlock, unlike some no-strings-attached competitors.
- Build-A-Plan's low cost only covers selected locations, so broad global coverage still requires the full Pro plan.
- Server speeds and streaming reliability are inconsistent compared to larger premium VPN providers.
- Customer support is primarily ticket/community-based rather than live chat for lower tiers.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Windscribe
Free- FreeFree
- 10GB of data per month with confirmed email
- 10 server countries
- Unlimited devices
- Build-A-Plan$3/month
- Pay per selected server location ($1/location)
- $3 minimum purchase
- Unlimited data on selected locations
- Pro$9/month
- Unlimited data
- 69+ countries
- $69/year on annual billing
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Windscribe if
- You need firewall / default block.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web.
- You also want unlimited simultaneous devices.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Windscribe better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Windscribe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Windscribe?
- authentik starts at Free and Windscribe at Free.
- Does authentik or Windscribe run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Windscribe runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Windscribe is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Windscribe cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Windscribe covers Firewall / default block, Unlimited simultaneous devices, Build-A-Plan, R.O.B.E.R.T. content blocker.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
authentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs TunnelBear
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Fortinet FortiGate
- authentik vs Surfshark
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs Avast One
- authentik vs IVPN
- authentik vs NordVPN
- authentik vs ProtonVPN
- authentik vs Osano
- authentik vs Syft
- authentik vs ThetaRay
- authentik vs Trivy
- authentik vs Trulioo
- authentik vs Unit21
- authentik vs Veracode
- authentik vs ExpressVPN
- Windscribe vs Authelia
- Windscribe vs Logto
- Windscribe vs Ory
- Windscribe vs Passbolt
- Windscribe vs Clerk
- Windscribe vs 1Password
- Windscribe vs Frontegg
- Windscribe vs OWASP ZAP
- Windscribe vs Infisical
- Windscribe vs Chainguard
- Windscribe vs Bitwarden
- Windscribe vs Cosign
- Windscribe vs CyberGhost VPN
- Windscribe vs Dahua Technology
- Windscribe vs Descope
- Windscribe vs Drata
- Windscribe vs DTiQ
- Windscribe vs Ory Kratos
- Windscribe vs TunnelBear
- Windscribe vs Private Internet Access
- Windscribe vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Windscribe vs Surfshark
- Windscribe vs Mullvad VPN
- Windscribe vs Avast One
- Windscribe vs IVPN
- Windscribe vs NordVPN
- Windscribe vs ProtonVPN
- Windscribe vs Osano
- Windscribe vs Syft
- Windscribe vs ThetaRay
- Windscribe vs Trivy
- Windscribe vs Trulioo
- Windscribe vs Unit21
- Windscribe vs Veracode
- Windscribe vs ExpressVPN
