Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Veracode

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Veracode
Cybersecurity
Application risk management platform for finding and fixing software vulnerabilities.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Veracode no public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Veracode actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Veracode
- Static analysis (SAST)
- Dynamic analysis (DAST)
- Software composition analysis
- AI-driven code remediation
- Container security
- Risk Manager (ASPM)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Veracode
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Veracode
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Veracode
Veracode
- Scanning applications for vulnerabilities across the SDLCnot authentik
- Automating remediation of flagged security flaws with AInot authentik
- Securing containerized workloads before deploymentnot authentik
- Running penetration tests as a managed servicenot authentik
- Enforcing security policy governance across many applicationsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Veracode
- No public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Full platform capability spans many modules, which can require significant onboarding.
- Package Firewall and PTaaS are separate add-ons rather than included by default.
- Primarily built for enterprise scale, less suited to small individual projects.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Veracode
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Veracode review.
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Veracode if
- You need static analysis (sast).
- You work on web, api.
- You also want dynamic analysis (dast).
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Veracode better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Veracode at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Veracode?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and On request for Veracode.
- Does authentik or Veracode run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Veracode runs on web, api.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Veracode starts at On request.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Veracode is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Veracode cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST), Dynamic analysis (DAST), Software composition analysis, AI-driven code remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Veracode: How does Veracode pricing work?
Veracode does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must request a personalized demo or contact sales to receive quotes tailored to their specific needs and usage volume.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Veracode: Does Veracode offer a free trial or free version?
No information about free trials or free versions is provided on Veracode's public website. Organizations must contact sales to discuss trial options.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Semgrep
- authentik vs Legit Security
- authentik vs Aikido
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Endor Labs
- authentik vs Tenable
- authentik vs Acunetix
- authentik vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- authentik vs Recorded Future
- authentik vs Tanium
- authentik vs Trivy
- authentik vs Grype
- authentik vs Quantexa
- authentik vs Termly
- authentik vs Transcend
- authentik vs WireGuard
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs DataGrail
- Veracode vs Authelia
- Veracode vs Logto
- Veracode vs Ory
- Veracode vs Passbolt
- Veracode vs Clerk
- Veracode vs 1Password
- Veracode vs Frontegg
- Veracode vs OWASP ZAP
- Veracode vs Infisical
- Veracode vs Chainguard
- Veracode vs Bitwarden
- Veracode vs Cosign
- Veracode vs CyberGhost VPN
- Veracode vs Dahua Technology
- Veracode vs Descope
- Veracode vs Drata
- Veracode vs DTiQ
- Veracode vs Ory Kratos
- Veracode vs Semgrep
- Veracode vs Legit Security
- Veracode vs Aikido
- Veracode vs Snyk
- Veracode vs Endor Labs
- Veracode vs Tenable
- Veracode vs Acunetix
- Veracode vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Veracode vs Recorded Future
- Veracode vs Tanium
- Veracode vs Trivy
- Veracode vs Grype
- Veracode vs Quantexa
- Veracode vs Termly
- Veracode vs Transcend
- Veracode vs WireGuard
- Veracode vs Akeyless
- Veracode vs DataGrail
