Marketing · head to head
Ahrefs vs Alchemer

Ahrefs
Marketing
Backlink and keyword research platform run on its own web crawler, metered by credits since 2024
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Alchemer
Surveys
Survey and feedback platform for research teams
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Ahrefs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ahrefs the April 2024 move from unlimited usage to credits was a real downgrade for existing customers: Lite meters 1,000 credits per user per month and the data tools lock when they are gone, so heavy research on the entry plan now forces an upgrade to Standard at 249 USD.; Alchemer more expensive than the simple form builders, which is the fair comparison for a short survey
- They diverge on capability: Ahrefs covers Site Explorer, Alchemer covers Deep question logic.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ahrefs and Alchemer actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ahrefs
- Site Explorer
- Keywords Explorer
- Site Audit
- Rank Tracker
- Content Explorer
- Competitive analysis
- Backlink checker
- Keyword research
Only in Alchemer
- Deep question logic
- Wide question types
- Workflow automation
- Integrations
- Panel and distribution
- Reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ahrefs
- SEO researchnot Alchemer
- Competitor analysisnot Alchemer
- Content planningnot Alchemer
- Backlink analysisnot Alchemer
- Rank trackingnot Alchemer
Alchemer
- Research questionnaires too conditional for a simple form buildernot Ahrefs
- Teams needing survey data routed into Salesforce or a warehousenot Ahrefs
- Organisations wanting research depth without enterprise experience-platform pricingnot Ahrefs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ahrefs
- The April 2024 move from unlimited usage to credits was a real downgrade for existing customers: Lite meters 1,000 credits per user per month and the data tools lock when they are gone, so heavy research on the entry plan now forces an upgrade to Standard at 249 USD.
- Pay-as-you-go credits are charged automatically once enabled, so a busy research month can produce an unbudgeted overage bill rather than a hard stop.
- Every paid tier includes exactly one user, and additional seats cost 40, 60 or 80 USD a month by tier, so a three-person team on Standard pays 369 USD a month rather than 249.
- Row caps bind before credit caps for many jobs: Lite returns at most 2,500 rows per report, which is not enough to export a mid-sized site backlink profile in one pass.
- Ahrefs states plainly that it never runs discounts and offers no free trial of the paid plans, so evaluation means paying a full month or working from the ownership-verified free tier.
- Rank Tracker updates weekly on every tier including Enterprise, so teams needing daily positions have to buy a separate tracker such as SE Ranking or Semrush.
- A growing share of capability is sold as add-ons rather than included: Report Builder at 99 USD a month, Content Kit from 99 USD, Project Boost at 20 or 200 USD per project, and Brand Radar from 199 USD.
Alchemer
- More expensive than the simple form builders, which is the fair comparison for a short survey
- The interface carries a long product history and is less immediately friendly than newer tools
- Advanced logic is powerful and correspondingly easy to misconfigure, and testing a complex survey is real work
- Named Alchemer since 2020, so much of the searchable material still says SurveyGizmo
Pricing, plan by plan
Ahrefs
Free- Ahrefs FreeFree
- Limited Site Explorer and Site Audit for sites you verify ownership of
- No access to competitor data
- Where paid subscriptions land after cancellation
- Starter$29/month
- Search and competitor data with reduced row limits
- No projects tier of the main plan ladder
- Sits below Lite on the published pricing page
- Lite$129/month
- 1 user included, up to 2 more at 40 USD each per month
- 1,000 credits per user per month, the only tier with a credit cap
- 5 projects, 750 tracked keywords, 6 months of historical data
- Standard$249/month
- 1 user included, up to 5 more at 60 USD each per month
- Unlimited report credits under fair use
- 20 projects, 2,000 tracked keywords, 2 years of historical data
Alchemer
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Alchemer review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Ahrefs if
- You need site explorer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want keywords explorer.
Choose Alchemer if
- You need deep question logic.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want wide question types.
Questions people ask
- Is Ahrefs or Alchemer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ahrefs starts at Free and Alchemer at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ahrefs or Alchemer?
- Ahrefs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ahrefs and On request for Alchemer.
- Does Ahrefs or Alchemer run on more platforms?
- Ahrefs runs on Web. Alchemer runs on Web, Cloud.
- Can I use Ahrefs for free?
- Yes. Ahrefs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Alchemer starts at On request.
- What is Ahrefs best used for?
- Ahrefs is most often used for seo research, competitor analysis, content planning, backlink analysis. Of those, seo research and competitor analysis are not what Alchemer is typically brought in for.
- What can Ahrefs do that Alchemer cannot?
- Ahrefs covers Site Explorer, Keywords Explorer, Site Audit, Rank Tracker. Alchemer covers Deep question logic, Wide question types, Workflow automation, Integrations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ahrefs: How much does Ahrefs cost?
Starter is 29 USD a month, Lite 129, Standard 249, Advanced 449 and Enterprise 1,499 with an annual commitment. Paying annually saves up to 17 percent, which Ahrefs describes as two months free, and it is arranged through support rather than on the site.
Alchemer: What does Alchemer cost?
Tiered annual subscriptions published on the vendor site. Check current rates there.
Ahrefs: What are Ahrefs credits and when did they start?
Ahrefs replaced unlimited report usage with credits in April 2024. It meters report credits, crawl credits and API units. Lite includes 1,000 credits per user per month; Standard and above are unlimited under a fair use policy. Purchased pay-as-you-go credits last three billing months.
Alchemer: Is Alchemer the same as SurveyGizmo?
Yes. SurveyGizmo was renamed Alchemer in 2020, which is why older reviews and documentation use the former name.
Ahrefs: Is Ahrefs or Moz better?
Ahrefs has the deeper and fresher link index and stronger competitive research, and it is the default for link work. Moz is cheaper at entry, owns Domain Authority as a reportable metric, and has a real local listings product. If you report DA to clients or manage multi-location listings, Moz earns its place; otherwise Ahrefs wins on data.
Alchemer: When is it worth more than a simple form builder?
When the questionnaire has real conditional logic, or when responses need to route into Salesforce or a data warehouse.
Ahrefs: Is there a free version or a trial?
There is Ahrefs Free, limited to Site Explorer and Site Audit on sites you verify you own, so it gives you no competitor data. Ahrefs states it never runs discounts and does not offer a trial of the paid plans.
Ahrefs: How many users are included?
One, on every paid tier up to Advanced. Extra seats cost 40 USD a month on Lite, 60 on Standard, 80 on Advanced and 100 on Enterprise, and unpaid additional users are billed automatically as pay-as-you-go.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ahrefs vs Moz
- Ahrefs vs Octoboard
- Ahrefs vs Buffer
- Ahrefs vs Hootsuite
- Ahrefs vs Vimeo
- Ahrefs vs Google Analytics
- Ahrefs vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Ahrefs vs CallRail
- Ahrefs vs Optimove
- Ahrefs vs Roxhill
- Ahrefs vs Swydo
- Ahrefs vs Mailgun
- Ahrefs vs AB Tasty
- Ahrefs vs Dreamdata
- Ahrefs vs Triple Whale
- Ahrefs vs Adobe Analytics
- Ahrefs vs Formstack
- Ahrefs vs Zoho Survey
- Ahrefs vs LimeSurvey
- Ahrefs vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- Ahrefs vs Zonka Feedback
- Ahrefs vs Tally
- Ahrefs vs Google Forms
- Ahrefs vs Microsoft Forms
- Ahrefs vs Sogolytics
- Ahrefs vs Cognito Forms
- Ahrefs vs Jotform
- Ahrefs vs Retool
- Ahrefs vs SurveyCTO
- Ahrefs vs SurveyLegend
- Ahrefs vs Wufoo
- Ahrefs vs KoboToolbox
- Ahrefs vs Paperform
- Alchemer vs Moz
- Alchemer vs Octoboard
- Alchemer vs Buffer
- Alchemer vs Hootsuite
- Alchemer vs Vimeo
- Alchemer vs Google Analytics
- Alchemer vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Alchemer vs CallRail
- Alchemer vs Optimove
- Alchemer vs Roxhill
- Alchemer vs Swydo
- Alchemer vs Mailgun
- Alchemer vs AB Tasty
- Alchemer vs Dreamdata
- Alchemer vs Triple Whale
- Alchemer vs Adobe Analytics
- Alchemer vs Formstack
- Alchemer vs Zoho Survey
- Alchemer vs LimeSurvey
- Alchemer vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- Alchemer vs Zonka Feedback
- Alchemer vs Tally
- Alchemer vs Google Forms
- Alchemer vs Microsoft Forms
- Alchemer vs Sogolytics
- Alchemer vs Cognito Forms
- Alchemer vs Jotform
- Alchemer vs Retool
- Alchemer vs SurveyCTO
- Alchemer vs SurveyLegend
- Alchemer vs Wufoo
- Alchemer vs KoboToolbox
- Alchemer vs Paperform
