Software · head to head
ActiveCampaign vs Grasshopper
The short version
- Only ActiveCampaign has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ActiveCampaign starter tier capped at 5 automation actions per automation; unlimited actions require Plus tier or higher; Grasshopper available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ActiveCampaign and Grasshopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | ActiveCampaign | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud-based SaaS | Web |
| Founded | 2003 | Unknown |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ActiveCampaign
- Contact management
- Sales pipeline
- Marketing automation
- Email marketing
- Customer service
- Reporting
- Automation
- Zapier
Only in Grasshopper
Nothing recorded that ActiveCampaign does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ActiveCampaign
- Businesses automating cross-channel campaigns (email, SMS, WhatsApp)not Grasshopper
- Marketing teams needing AI-driven lead scoring and automationnot Grasshopper
Grasshopper
No use cases recorded yet. See the Grasshopper review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ActiveCampaign
- Starter tier capped at 5 automation actions per automation; unlimited actions require Plus tier or higher
- Active Intelligence (AI features) limited or excluded in Starter and Plus tiers; Advanced Intelligence only available in Pro and Enterprise
- SSO and advanced CRM integrations only available in Pro and Enterprise tiers
- Multiple users scaling limited: Starter allows 1 user, Plus allows 3, Enterprise allows 5 users
Grasshopper
- Available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
- Plans start at $14/month only under a promotional discount of up to $75 off select plans, meaning the advertised entry price is not the standing rate
Pricing, plan by plan
ActiveCampaign
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the ActiveCampaign review.
Grasshopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Grasshopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ActiveCampaign if
- You need contact management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud-based SaaS.
- You also want sales pipeline.
Choose Grasshopper if
Nothing in the data separates Grasshopper from ActiveCampaign on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is ActiveCampaign or Grasshopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. ActiveCampaign starts at Free and Grasshopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ActiveCampaign or Grasshopper?
- ActiveCampaign has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for ActiveCampaign and On request for Grasshopper.
- Does ActiveCampaign or Grasshopper run on more platforms?
- ActiveCampaign runs on Cloud-based SaaS. Grasshopper runs on Web.
- Can I use ActiveCampaign for free?
- Yes. ActiveCampaign has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Grasshopper starts at On request.
- What is ActiveCampaign best used for?
- ActiveCampaign is most often used for businesses automating cross-channel campaigns (email, sms, whatsapp), marketing teams needing ai-driven lead scoring and automation. Of those, businesses automating cross-channel campaigns (email, sms, whatsapp) and marketing teams needing ai-driven lead scoring and automation are not what Grasshopper is typically brought in for.
- What can ActiveCampaign do that Grasshopper cannot?
- ActiveCampaign covers Contact management, Sales pipeline, Marketing automation, Email marketing.
Related pages
More on ActiveCampaign
More on Grasshopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- ActiveCampaign vs AWeber
- ActiveCampaign vs Brevo
- ActiveCampaign vs EmailOctopus
- ActiveCampaign vs Flodesk
- ActiveCampaign vs Resend
- ActiveCampaign vs GetResponse
- ActiveCampaign vs Instantly
- ActiveCampaign vs Klaviyo
- ActiveCampaign vs Loops
- ActiveCampaign vs MailerLite
- ActiveCampaign vs Mailjet
- ActiveCampaign vs Omnisend
- ActiveCampaign vs RD Station Marketing
- ActiveCampaign vs SendGrid
- ActiveCampaign vs RingCentral Video
- ActiveCampaign vs Novu
- ActiveCampaign vs Webex by Cisco
- ActiveCampaign vs Chanty
- ActiveCampaign vs Chatwork
- ActiveCampaign vs Courier
- ActiveCampaign vs Flock
- ActiveCampaign vs Google Chat
- ActiveCampaign vs Lark
- ActiveCampaign vs Mattermost
- ActiveCampaign vs Quo
- ActiveCampaign vs Rocket.Chat
- ActiveCampaign vs TeamViewer
- ActiveCampaign vs Textline
- ActiveCampaign vs Twist
- ActiveCampaign vs Vowel
- Grasshopper vs AWeber
- Grasshopper vs Brevo
- Grasshopper vs EmailOctopus
- Grasshopper vs Flodesk
- Grasshopper vs Resend
- Grasshopper vs GetResponse
- Grasshopper vs Instantly
- Grasshopper vs Klaviyo
- Grasshopper vs Loops
- Grasshopper vs MailerLite
- Grasshopper vs Mailjet
- Grasshopper vs Omnisend
- Grasshopper vs RD Station Marketing
- Grasshopper vs SendGrid
- Grasshopper vs RingCentral Video
- Grasshopper vs Novu
- Grasshopper vs Webex by Cisco
- Grasshopper vs Chanty
- Grasshopper vs Chatwork
- Grasshopper vs Courier
- Grasshopper vs Flock
- Grasshopper vs Google Chat
- Grasshopper vs Lark
- Grasshopper vs Mattermost
- Grasshopper vs Quo
- Grasshopper vs Rocket.Chat
- Grasshopper vs TeamViewer
- Grasshopper vs Textline
- Grasshopper vs Twist
- Grasshopper vs Vowel


