
Quoter
MSP quoting and proposal software from ScalePad, priced by published quote volume rather than by seat
Category
Proposal & Quote software and applications
Every listing shows its published starting price on the same footing, so a shortlist does not take ten tabs.
Counted from the published pricing of the 20 listings on this page. A tool counts as free only where it publishes a $0 plan, an open-source licence or a starting price of zero.
Paid proposals plans in this set start anywhere from $10 a month for HelloSign to $20,000 for Loopio. The median entry price across the 13 tools that publish one is $135, half of them start below that figure and half above it.
Nothing in this category publishes a $0 plan, all 20 listings are paid from the first day.
10 of 20 keep at least one tier unpriced and sold by quote, which in practice means the number you end up paying at the top end is not on this page or on theirs.
The billing model each of the 20 proposals listings publishes, counted. Two tools at the same headline price are not the same purchase if one of them charges per seat.
Separately, 10 of 20 publish at least one tier with no price attached. Those are sold by quote, so the top of the ladder is negotiable, and unknowable, until you talk to sales.
Every capability named in a published pricing tier by any of the 16 proposals tools here that break their plans down, counted once per vendor. This measures what vendors choose to advertise as a selling point, not everything the software does, an absence below is silence, not a missing feature.
Nothing else is named by more than one vendor, beyond the list on the left, no two of these tools describe their tiers the same way.
Named by exactly one vendor: Access controls, Automated workflows, Demand forecasting, Integrations, Presentation controls, Time tracking and invoicing. Those are differentiators rather than table stakes.
The subject tags that recur across these 20 listings, with the number of tools carrying each. A category label is a filing decision; this is the closer read of what is actually filed under it.
Carried by a single tool: accounting, answer-library, client portal, design, Engagement Letters, microsoft, Quotes, simple. If one of those is the reason you are here, the category page is the wrong lens, go straight to that product.
Four things the numbers above should change about your shortlist.
No listing in this category publishes a $0 plan, and the cheapest way in is $10 a month with HelloSign. That changes how you evaluate: ask for a trial in writing before you shortlist, and treat any tool you cannot try as a tool you cannot verify.
$10 to $20,000 is a $19,990 spread on entry price alone, and a spread that wide is never about polish, it is about who the vendor built for. Tools at the bottom of this ladder are priced for one person or a small team; tools near $20,000 are priced for a department with a procurement process. Decide which of those you are before you compare capability, or you will shortlist four tools that were never competing for the same buyer.
7 of 20 tools here publish three or more tiers, and the median vendor in this category ships 2 of them. The advertised price is the first rung, and the things teams tend to need, client portal, priority support, all starter features, are named in higher plans far more often than in entry ones. Price your shortlist at the tier that contains what you need, not at the tier on the pricing page's left edge.
This category splits across 4 billing models: quote on 7 listings, subscription on 6, and 2 other arrangements across the rest. A per-user price and a flat subscription at the same headline figure are not the same purchase, the first one grows with headcount and the second does not. Multiply by your real team size before you compare two numbers side by side.
Every pairing below is a full comparison: the same checklist applied to both, so a gap in one is a gap in the other.
Answered from the listings on this page, and nowhere else.
Keep this
The shortlist for “Proposals”, plus a note if any of their prices change.
Adjacent in the same taxonomy, not a ranking.