Softwr

APIs · alternatives

Alternatives to Bruno

24 apis tools sit alongside Bruno in this directory. Below is what separates each from Bruno on the figures we hold, price, model, tier count and rating, and a direct comparison for every one.

Alternatives listed
24
With a free tier
5
Cheaper to start
1
Bruno starts at
Free, then $6/month

Why people look past Bruno

Nothing on the record flags a reason to move. Bruno has a free tier, and starts at $6/month against a category median of $15/month. People still switch over fit and workflow, and those are not things a catalogue entry can measure, which is what the comparisons below are for.

What each alternative does differently

Ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry. Differences are drawn from price, pricing model, tier count and rating, the fields the category listing carries. For a feature-level difference, follow the head-to-head link on each card: those pages read both full records.

Free, then $15/month

Open-source Backend as a Service with REST API and SDKs

  • Starts $9 a month dearer, at $15/month.
  • 2 tiers to Bruno's 3.
Free, then $5/month

GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases

  • Starts $1 a month cheaper, at $5/month.

Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI

Priced and rated the same as Bruno on the figures we hold. The difference, if there is one, is in the feature records.

Free, then $15/month

Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs

  • Starts $9 a month dearer, at $15/month.

European bank API aggregation with a free restricted production tier for your own accounts

  • Sold on a Per connected account per month model rather than freemium.
  • 2 tiers to Bruno's 3.
£100/month

UK banking-as-a-service from a company that holds its own full banking licence

  • No free tier, where Bruno has one.
  • Starts $94 a month dearer, at £100/month.
  • Sold on a Per month with usage drawdown model rather than freemium.

Every Bruno alternative at a glance

A dash means the catalogue entry carries no figure, not that the answer is nothing.

APIs alternatives to Bruno
ToolEntry priceModelTiersHead to head
Bruno (this page)Free, then $6/monthFreemium3
AppwriteOpen-source Backend as a Service with REST API and SDKsFree, then $15/month-2vs Bruno
HasuraGraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databasesFree, then $5/monthFreemium3vs Bruno
PocketBaseOpen-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UIFree--vs Bruno
SanityHeadless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIsFree, then $15/monthFreemium3vs Bruno
Enable BankingFreePer connected account per month2vs Bruno
Griffin£100/monthPer month with usage drawdown3vs Bruno
Fintech FarmOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
FlybitsOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
LithicOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
Brite PaymentsOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
i2cOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
FintectureOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
NeonomicsOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
EnfuceOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
MambuOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
AiiaOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
MarqetaOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
HighnoteOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
MenigaOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
PaymentologyOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
Ozone APIOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
Episode SixOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
BackbaseOn requestQuote1vs Bruno
10x BankingOn requestQuote1vs Bruno

Ratings are aggregated from third-party sources and imported with each catalogue entry; Softwr hosts no reviews of these products. How each figure is used is set out on the Bruno badges page.

Cheaper ways to solve the same problem

Free to start (5)

These publish a tier that costs nothing, so they can be evaluated before any money changes hands.

Cheaper than Bruno (1)

Entry price under Bruno's $6/month. The record does not say what unit that price is charged in, so confirm per-seat versus flat rate before comparing budgets.

What you would be giving up

Bruno is most often brought in for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Anything replacing it has to cover the ones you actually depend on, and a cheaper tool that misses one of them is not cheaper.

Two things this page cannot settle. It compares on price, model, tier count and rating, because those are the fields the category listing carries, feature-level differences need both full records, which is what the head-to-head pages load. And the ratings are third-party aggregates imported with each entry rather than reviews written here, so a 0.2 difference between two tools is noise rather than a finding.

If Bruno is broadly right and the question is cost, the Bruno pricing breakdown covers every tier and what each one adds. If you want the whole field rather than a shortlist, the APIs category lists everything the directory holds, and best apis tools ranks them.

Bruno runs on windows, macos, linux. Platform coverage is not carried on the category listing for the alternatives, so it is one more thing to check on each head-to-head page rather than here.

Questions about Bruno alternatives

What are the main alternatives to Bruno?
24 other apis tools are listed in this directory, led by Appwrite, Hasura, PocketBase, Sanity. They are ordered by the aggregated rating on each catalogue entry, not by any Softwr ranking.
What is the best free alternative to Bruno?
5 of the alternatives listed here can be used without paying: Appwrite, Hasura, PocketBase, Sanity, Enable Banking.
Is there a cheaper alternative to Bruno?
Yes. 1 of the alternatives below start under Bruno's $6/month: Hasura at Free, then $5/month.
Is there a reason to switch away from Bruno?
Nothing in the data flags one. Bruno has a free tier, and starts at $6/month against a category median of $15/month. Fit and workflow are the usual reasons to move, and those are not things this record can measure.
What would I give up by switching from Bruno?
Bruno is most often brought in for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Anything you replace it with has to cover the ones you actually rely on, the side-by-side comparisons linked from each alternative below put the two feature records against each other.
Is there an open-source alternative to Bruno?
None of the apis tools listed here are recorded as open source. That is what the licence field on each entry says, and the field is not always filled in, so it is worth checking directly for any tool you are serious about.
How were these Bruno alternatives chosen?
They are the tools filed in the same category, APIs, ordered by the aggregated rating on each entry. There is no editorial shortlist, and nothing on this page is paid: no sponsored placement runs on alternatives pages and the order cannot be bought. Softwr has not used these products.
Where can I compare Bruno against one of these directly?
Every alternative below has a side-by-side page against Bruno covering price, platforms, features and what each one is used for. Those pages read the full record for both products rather than the summary shown here.
Does this list cover every apis tool?
No. It covers what this directory holds in the APIs category, 24 tools beside Bruno. The category page lists the rest of the catalogue as it grows.

Related pages