Software · head to head
Bruno vs Hoppscotch

Bruno
Software
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Hoppscotch
Software
Open-source API development ecosystem with web-based REST client
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; Hoppscotch hoppscotch's core client is MIT licensed, but hoppscotch.io/pricing (per prior and repeated fetch) renders no server-side pricing content, meaning any hosted Team/Enterprise tier pricing is not readable without a JavaScript-executing browser
- They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, Hoppscotch covers REST Client.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bruno and Hoppscotch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bruno | Hoppscotch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Windows, MacOS, Linux | Web, Desktop, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2022 | 2019 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
- Linux support
Only in Hoppscotch
- REST Client
- WebSocket
- gRPC Client
- Documentation tools
- CI/CD
- Web support
- Desktop support
- Self-hosted support
Both cover
- GitHub
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Hoppscotch
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Hoppscotch
- Offline API development without an accountnot Hoppscotch
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch
- API Developmentnot Bruno
- API Gatewaynot Bruno
- API Testingnot Bruno
- API Documentationnot Bruno
- Microservicesnot Bruno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Hoppscotch
- Hoppscotch's core client is MIT licensed, but hoppscotch.io/pricing (per prior and repeated fetch) renders no server-side pricing content, meaning any hosted Team/Enterprise tier pricing is not readable without a JavaScript-executing browser
Pricing, plan by plan
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full IDE features
- Git integration
- Local storage
Hoppscotch
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full REST client
- WebSocket support
- Community
- Teams$8/monthly
- Team collaboration
- Cloud sync
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Choose Hoppscotch if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Self-hosted.
- You also want websocket.
Questions people ask
- Is Bruno or Hoppscotch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and Hoppscotch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bruno or Hoppscotch?
- Bruno starts at Free and Hoppscotch at Free.
- Does Bruno or Hoppscotch run on more platforms?
- Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Hoppscotch runs on Web, Desktop, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Bruno for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bruno best used for?
- Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Hoppscotch is typically brought in for.
- What can Bruno do that Hoppscotch cannot?
- Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, Git repositories. Hoppscotch covers REST Client, WebSocket, gRPC Client, Documentation tools. Both handle GitHub.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Apigee
- Bruno vs KeystoneJS
- Bruno vs Parse Server
- Bruno vs Stoplight
- Bruno vs Strapi
- Bruno vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs WSO2 API Manager
- Bruno vs 3scale
- Bruno vs Akana
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Backendless
- Hoppscotch vs Appwrite
- Hoppscotch vs Hasura
- Hoppscotch vs PocketBase
- Hoppscotch vs Sanity
- Hoppscotch vs Apigee
- Hoppscotch vs KeystoneJS
- Hoppscotch vs Parse Server
- Hoppscotch vs Stoplight
- Hoppscotch vs Strapi
- Hoppscotch vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hoppscotch vs Thunder Client
- Hoppscotch vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hoppscotch vs 3scale
- Hoppscotch vs Akana
- Hoppscotch vs Asyncapi
- Hoppscotch vs AWS API Gateway
- Hoppscotch vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hoppscotch vs Backendless
