APIs · head to head
Bruno vs Thunder Client

Bruno
APIs
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
APIs
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bruno and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bruno | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, MacOS, Linux | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
- Linux support
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
Both cover
- GitHub
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Thunder Client
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Thunder Client
- Offline API development without an accountnot Thunder Client
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Bruno
- API Gatewaynot Bruno
- API Testingnot Bruno
- API Documentationnot Bruno
- Microservicesnot Bruno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core API Client
- Limited Git integration
- 2 Workspaces
- Pro$6/month
- Core API Client
- Native Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
- Ultimate$11/month
- Core API Client
- Full Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Bruno or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bruno or Thunder Client?
- Bruno starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Bruno or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Bruno for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bruno best used for?
- Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Bruno do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, Git repositories. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode. Both handle GitHub.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bruno: What is included in Bruno's free tier?
The Open Source plan includes the core API client, limited Git integration, and up to 2 workspaces at no cost. A 14-day free trial of the Ultimate plan is also available without requiring a credit card.
SourceThunder Client: How much does Thunder Client cost?
Thunder Client publishes a free plan at no cost, then Starter at $3, Business at $7 and Enterprise at $16, all priced annually.
SourceBruno: What is the difference between Bruno Pro and Ultimate plans?
Pro ($6/month) includes native Git integration and unlimited workspaces. Ultimate ($11/month) adds SSO/SCIM support, audit logs, 24-hour support (vs. 48-hour), and an account manager. Ultimate supports unlimited OpenAPI syncs while Pro is limited to 5 per month.
SourceThunder Client: Is Thunder Client free?
Yes, there is a free plan. It is used through the Thunder Client extension for VS Code, available from the marketplace, with limits applied compared with the paid tiers.
SourceBruno: How much does Bruno Pro save compared to other API tools?
The vendor claims Ultimate saves teams more than 70% versus Postman, though this comparison is promotional rather than a specific cost metric.
SourceRelated pages
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs REST Client VSCode
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs Apidog
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Hoppscotch
- Bruno vs HTTPie
- Bruno vs Kong
- Bruno vs Tyk
- Bruno vs Directus
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Basis Theory
- Bruno vs Boomi API Management
- Bruno vs Codat
- Bruno vs Paw
- Bruno vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Bruno vs Prisma
- Bruno vs RapidAPI
- Bruno vs 10x Banking
- Bruno vs Brite Payments
- Bruno vs Bud Financial
- Bruno vs Episode Six
- Bruno vs Swagger
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs REST Client VSCode
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs Apidog
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Hoppscotch
- Thunder Client vs HTTPie
- Thunder Client vs Kong
- Thunder Client vs Tyk
- Thunder Client vs Directus
- Thunder Client vs Asyncapi
- Thunder Client vs AWS API Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Thunder Client vs Basis Theory
- Thunder Client vs Boomi API Management
- Thunder Client vs Codat
- Thunder Client vs Paw
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs Prisma
- Thunder Client vs RapidAPI
- Thunder Client vs 10x Banking
- Thunder Client vs Brite Payments
- Thunder Client vs Bud Financial
- Thunder Client vs Episode Six
- Thunder Client vs Swagger
