Software · head to head
Bruno vs Thunder Client

Bruno
Software
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
Software
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bruno and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bruno | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Windows, MacOS, Linux | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
- Linux support
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
Both cover
- GitHub
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Thunder Client
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Thunder Client
- Offline API development without an accountnot Thunder Client
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Bruno
- API Gatewaynot Bruno
- API Testingnot Bruno
- API Documentationnot Bruno
- Microservicesnot Bruno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full IDE features
- Git integration
- Local storage
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Bruno or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bruno or Thunder Client?
- Bruno starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Bruno or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Bruno for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bruno best used for?
- Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Bruno do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, Git repositories. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode. Both handle GitHub.
Related pages
More on Thunder Client
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Apigee
- Bruno vs KeystoneJS
- Bruno vs Parse Server
- Bruno vs Stoplight
- Bruno vs Strapi
- Bruno vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Bruno vs WSO2 API Manager
- Bruno vs 3scale
- Bruno vs Akana
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Backendless
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Apigee
- Thunder Client vs KeystoneJS
- Thunder Client vs Parse Server
- Thunder Client vs Stoplight
- Thunder Client vs Strapi
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs 3scale
- Thunder Client vs Akana
- Thunder Client vs Asyncapi
- Thunder Client vs AWS API Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Thunder Client vs Backendless
