Softwr

Software · head to head

Workvivo vs Mo

Workvivo logo

Workvivo

Software

Employee experience platform for connected workplaces

From
$4/month
Rated
-
M

Mo

Software

Employee recognition and culture platform

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Workvivo the pricing page publishes no price, no minimum and no per-licence rate; the vendor states cost depends on licence count and organisation needs and requires a custom quote; Mo the pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no minimum; it states quotes are based on your goals and company size
  • They diverge on capability: Workvivo covers Social activity feed, Mo covers Social recognition.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Workvivo and Mo actually diverge.

Attributes where Workvivo and Mo differ
AttributeWorkvivoMo
Starting price$4/monthOn request
Founded20172019

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Workvivo

  • Social activity feed
  • Employee recognition
  • Internal communications
  • Podcasts and video
  • Surveys
  • Analytics
  • Zoom
  • Workday

Only in Mo

  • Social recognition
  • Recognition feeds
  • Analytics dashboard
  • Manager tools
  • Customizable workflow
  • Reporting
  • Google Workspace

Both cover

  • Mobile app
  • Integrations
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Slack

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Workvivo

  • Company-wide internal communications and news for desk and frontline staffnot Mo
  • Employee recognition, badges and awards inside a social activity feednot Mo
  • Livestreamed all-hands broadcasts with multi-language auto-translationnot Mo

Mo

  • Peer recognition and appreciation on a shared social feednot Workvivo
  • Running annual awards and nomination programsnot Workvivo
  • Recognition delivered inside Microsoft Teams and Slack for distributed teamsnot Workvivo

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Workvivo

  • The pricing page publishes no price, no minimum and no per-licence rate; the vendor states cost depends on licence count and organisation needs and requires a custom quote
  • There is no free trial; the vendor offers only a demo
  • Real-time chat with voice and video is a paid add-on rather than part of the core platform
  • Agentic search across connected systems is sold separately as the HQ Agent add-on tier
  • Employee listening and engagement surveys sit in the separate Seer product, added on or bought standalone
  • Digital signage through Workvivo TV is another paid add-on
  • Plan and add-on changes go through a Workvivo CX Manager rather than self-serve

Mo

  • The pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no minimum; it states quotes are based on your goals and company size
  • The only route to a figure is a quote request or a 30-minute call with the vendor's team
  • There is no free tier, trial price or self-serve signup published

Pricing, plan by plan

Workvivo

$4/month
  • Business$4/month
    • Social feed
    • Recognition
    • Mobile app
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Advanced analytics
    • Custom integrations
    • Dedicated support

Mo

On request
  • Mo Platform$undefined/month
    • Recognition
    • Culture tools
    • Analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose Workvivo if

  • You need social activity feed.
  • You also want employee recognition.

Choose Mo if

  • You need social recognition.
  • You also want recognition feeds.

Questions people ask

Is Workvivo or Mo better?
Neither clearly leads. Workvivo starts at $4/month and Mo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Workvivo or Mo?
Workvivo starts at $4/month and Mo at On request.
Does Workvivo or Mo run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Workvivo best used for?
Workvivo is most often used for company-wide internal communications and news for desk and frontline staff, employee recognition, badges and awards inside a social activity feed, livestreamed all-hands broadcasts with multi-language auto-translation. Of those, company-wide internal communications and news for desk and frontline staff and employee recognition, badges and awards inside a social activity feed are not what Mo is typically brought in for.
What can Workvivo do that Mo cannot?
Workvivo covers Social activity feed, Employee recognition, Internal communications, Podcasts and video. Mo covers Social recognition, Recognition feeds, Analytics dashboard, Manager tools. Both handle Mobile app, Integrations, Microsoft Teams, Slack.

Related pages