CRM & Sales · head to head
Woodpecker vs Reply.io
Woodpecker
CRM & Sales
Cold email and LinkedIn outreach automation platform with pay-per-use pricing
- From
- $7/month
- Rated
- -
Reply.io
CRM & Sales
Multichannel sales engagement platform for email, LinkedIn, calls and SMS outreach
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Reply.io has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Woodpecker linkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.; Reply.io multichannel features and CRM sync require the higher-priced Professional tier or above.
- They diverge on capability: Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing, Reply.io covers Multichannel sequences.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Woodpecker and Reply.io actually diverge.
| Attribute | Woodpecker | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $7/month | Free |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
Identical on both: platforms (web, api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CRM & Sales).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Woodpecker
- Cold email sequencing
- Email verification
- Deliverability warm-up
- Lead Finder
- Agency panel
- API and integrations
Only in Reply.io
- Multichannel sequences
- Contact database
- AI email assistant
- Deliverability tools
- CRM sync
- Reporting and analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Woodpecker
- Running personalized one-to-one cold email campaignsnot Reply.io
- Agencies managing outreach across multiple client accountsnot Reply.io
- Verifying catch-all email addresses before sendingnot Reply.io
- Adding LinkedIn outreach on top of an existing email campaignnot Reply.io
Reply.io
- Running multichannel outbound sequences combining email and LinkedInnot Woodpecker
- Automating cold calling and SMS follow-ups alongside emailnot Woodpecker
- Finding new B2B prospects from a built-in contact databasenot Woodpecker
- Syncing outreach activity into an existing CRMnot Woodpecker
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Woodpecker
- LinkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- Pay-per-contacted-prospect pricing can be harder to predict than flat per-seat plans at high volume.
- Exceeding the contacted-prospect limit halts new sends until the plan is topped up.
- Lacks the built-in calling/SMS channels that some multichannel competitors offer.
Reply.io
- Multichannel features and CRM sync require the higher-priced Professional tier or above.
- LinkedIn and calling/SMS automation are billed as separate per-account add-ons on top of plan pricing.
- Pricing is per user, which can raise costs quickly for larger sales teams.
- Monthly (non-annual) billing carries a notable price premium over the advertised annual rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Woodpecker
$7/month- Pay-per-use$7/month
- $7 per 100 contacted prospects
- Unlimited team members and email accounts
- 4 warm-ups monthly
Reply.io
Free- FreeFree
- Limited monthly emails
- Basic sequence features
- Starter$49/month
- Email-only sequences
- Billed annually per user
- Professional$89/month
- Multichannel sequences
- CRM sync
- Billed annually per user
- Ultimate$139/month
- Full AI suite
- Highest sending limits
- Advanced reporting and integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Woodpecker if
- You need cold email sequencing.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want email verification.
Choose Reply.io if
- You need multichannel sequences.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want contact database.
Questions people ask
- Is Woodpecker or Reply.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Woodpecker starts at $7/month and Reply.io at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Woodpecker or Reply.io?
- Reply.io has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $7/month for Woodpecker and Free for Reply.io.
- Does Woodpecker or Reply.io run on more platforms?
- Both run on web, api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Reply.io for free?
- Yes. Reply.io has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Woodpecker starts at $7/month.
- What is Woodpecker best used for?
- Woodpecker is most often used for running personalized one-to-one cold email campaigns, agencies managing outreach across multiple client accounts, verifying catch-all email addresses before sending, adding linkedin outreach on top of an existing email campaign. Of those, running personalized one-to-one cold email campaigns and agencies managing outreach across multiple client accounts are not what Reply.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Woodpecker do that Reply.io cannot?
- Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing, Email verification, Deliverability warm-up, Lead Finder. Reply.io covers Multichannel sequences, Contact database, AI email assistant, Deliverability tools.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Woodpecker: What does Woodpecker cost?
Woodpecker charges $7 per 100 contacted prospects per month (discounted heavily on annual billing), with add-ons like LinkedIn outreach at $29/month per account and extra warm-ups at $5/month each.
SourceWoodpecker: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Woodpecker offers a 14-day free trial with full features, capped at 14 days or 100 emails sent, whichever comes first; the trial can be extended by contacting support.
SourceWoodpecker: How is usage metered?
Usage is metered by the number of prospects contacted per month; exceeding the plan's contacted-prospect limit halts new email sends, and exceeding the stored prospect limit prevents adding new leads.
SourceWoodpecker: What does Woodpecker integrate with?
Woodpecker integrates with Pipedrive, HubSpot, Zoho, Calendly, Zapier, Google Sheets, and offers an API, CLI, webhooks and an MCP server for custom workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Woodpecker vs Outreach
- Woodpecker vs Gong
- Woodpecker vs Seismic
- Woodpecker vs lemlist
- Woodpecker vs Snov.io
- Woodpecker vs Apollo.io
- Woodpecker vs Bitrix24
- Woodpecker vs Capsule
- Woodpecker vs Clari
- Woodpecker vs Freshsales
- Woodpecker vs Lusha
- Woodpecker vs Streak
- Woodpecker vs UpLead
- Woodpecker vs Affinity
- Woodpecker vs Agile CRM
- Woodpecker vs Capsule CRM
- Woodpecker vs Clay
- Reply.io vs Outreach
- Reply.io vs Gong
- Reply.io vs Seismic
- Reply.io vs lemlist
- Reply.io vs Snov.io
- Reply.io vs Apollo.io
- Reply.io vs Bitrix24
- Reply.io vs Capsule
- Reply.io vs Clari
- Reply.io vs Freshsales
- Reply.io vs Lusha
- Reply.io vs Streak
- Reply.io vs UpLead
- Reply.io vs Affinity
- Reply.io vs Agile CRM
- Reply.io vs Capsule CRM
- Reply.io vs Clay