Softwr

Insurance · head to head

InsuredMine vs Verisk

InsuredMine logo

InsuredMine

Insurance

Sales pipeline and client engagement layer that sits on top of an agency management system

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Verisk logo

Verisk

Insurance

Insurance data, ISO forms and rating content that most American P&C products are built on

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: InsuredMine integration depth varies by agency management system, so capability demonstrated on one platform may not exist on yours and must be tested against live data before purchase.; Verisk the ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
  • They diverge on capability: InsuredMine covers Agency management system sync, Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which InsuredMine and Verisk actually diverge.

Attributes where InsuredMine and Verisk differ
AttributeInsuredMineVerisk
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, API, Windows

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in InsuredMine

  • Agency management system sync
  • Sales pipelines
  • Automated campaigns
  • Client portal and mobile app
  • Renewal and X-date tracking
  • Producer analytics

Only in Verisk

  • ISO forms and rating content
  • ClaimSearch
  • Extreme event models
  • Property data
  • Xactimate
  • Underwriting analytics

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

InsuredMine

  • An agency tracking new business pipeline and cross-sell that the agency management system does not report onnot Verisk
  • A commercial agency managing prospect expiry dates alongside the in-force booknot Verisk
  • An agency running renewal and birthday campaigns without exporting lists to a separate email toolnot Verisk
  • A principal who wants producer activity reporting the agency management system cannot producenot Verisk

Verisk

  • A carrier filing standard commercial lines products that must use recognised forms and loss costsnot InsuredMine
  • A claims organisation checking submitted claims against the industry database for prior activitynot InsuredMine
  • A property insurer pricing catastrophe exposure for reinsurance placementnot InsuredMine
  • An MGA that needs bureau content without building and filing proprietary forms in every statenot InsuredMine

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

InsuredMine

  • Integration depth varies by agency management system, so capability demonstrated on one platform may not exist on yours and must be tested against live data before purchase.
  • It adds a second place where client data lives, and when the sync disagrees with the agency management system staff have to know which one to trust.
  • It cannot repair poor data hygiene in the underlying system; duplicate clients and missing expiry dates simply propagate into the pipeline.
  • Pricing is per user, so agencies with many part-time or service-only staff pay for seats that generate no pipeline activity.
  • It depends on continued integration access to systems built by Applied and Vertafore, both of whom sell competing sales and marketing modules, which is a strategic dependency outside the vendor control.

Verisk

  • The ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
  • Pricing is negotiated separately per product and per line, and large insurers routinely find overlapping agreements across underwriting, claims and actuarial that nobody had counted together.
  • Circular updates to forms and loss costs must be loaded into your policy system on a schedule, which is recurring work that carriers with older platforms do partly by hand.
  • The breadth of the portfolio means account management is spread across product teams, so a problem in one service does not necessarily get attention from the people selling you another.
  • Usage-based components such as data prefill and claims searches make annual spend hard to forecast, and the variance lands in the year you grow fastest.

Pricing, plan by plan

InsuredMine

On request
  • InsuredMine$undefined/year
    • Pipeline and CRM
    • Agency management system integration
    • Campaign automation

Verisk

On request
  • Verisk Insurance Solutions$undefined/year
    • ISO forms and loss cost licensing
    • Data and analytics services by line
    • API access

Which should you pick?

Choose InsuredMine if

  • You need agency management system sync.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want sales pipelines.
InsuredMine review

Choose Verisk if

  • You need iso forms and rating content.
  • You work on Web, API, Windows.
  • You also want claimsearch.
Verisk review

Questions people ask

Is InsuredMine or Verisk better?
Neither clearly leads. InsuredMine starts at On request and Verisk at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, InsuredMine or Verisk?
InsuredMine starts at On request and Verisk at On request.
Does InsuredMine or Verisk run on more platforms?
InsuredMine runs on Web, iOS, Android. Verisk runs on Web, API, Windows.
What is InsuredMine best used for?
InsuredMine is most often used for an agency tracking new business pipeline and cross-sell that the agency management system does not report on, a commercial agency managing prospect expiry dates alongside the in-force book, an agency running renewal and birthday campaigns without exporting lists to a separate email tool, a principal who wants producer activity reporting the agency management system cannot produce. Of those, an agency tracking new business pipeline and cross-sell that the agency management system does not report on and a commercial agency managing prospect expiry dates alongside the in-force book are not what Verisk is typically brought in for.
What can InsuredMine do that Verisk cannot?
InsuredMine covers Agency management system sync, Sales pipelines, Automated campaigns, Client portal and mobile app. Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content, ClaimSearch, Extreme event models, Property data.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

InsuredMine: Does it replace our agency management system?

No, and it does not try to. Policy history and carrier download stay in the agency management system; InsuredMine adds the sales and engagement layer on top.

Verisk: Can a carrier avoid ISO content entirely?

Only by developing and filing proprietary forms and rates, which a handful of large insurers do. For everyone else the filing and legal cost of independence exceeds the licence.

InsuredMine: Which agency management systems does it work with best?

It connects to Applied Epic, AMS360, EZLynx and HawkSoft, but the depth of each connection differs. Insist on a trial against your own system before committing.

Verisk: Is Xactimate part of Verisk?

Yes. It came with the Xactware acquisition and is the dominant property claims estimating tool in North America, used by carriers and by the contractors they pay.

InsuredMine: Is it worth it for a small agency?

If pipeline and renewal follow-up currently live in spreadsheets, usually yes. If your agency management system already reports adequately on those, the overlap is larger than the gain.

Verisk: Did Verisk sell off businesses?

Yes. It divested non-insurance units including its energy research business in 2023 and refocused on insurance data and analytics.

Share

Related pages

More on InsuredMine

More on Verisk

Keep looking

Other head to heads