Cybersecurity · head to head
Shufti Pro vs Silent Eight

Shufti Pro
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Shufti Pro rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.; Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- They diverge on capability: Shufti Pro covers Document verification, Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Shufti Pro and Silent Eight actually diverge.
| Attribute | Shufti Pro | Silent Eight |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Shufti Pro
- Document verification
- Facial biometrics
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- Address verification
- Age verification
- Pay as you go option
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Shufti Pro
- A crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coveragenot Silent Eight
- A gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economicsnot Silent Eight
- A gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phonesnot Silent Eight
- A startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volumenot Silent Eight
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Shufti Pro
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Shufti Pro
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Shufti Pro
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Shufti Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Shufti Pro
- Rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- Accuracy on difficult document types trails the premium vendors, and the saving per check is often consumed by the manual review headcount handling the additional referrals.
- The enterprise assurance profile is thinner than that of larger competitors, so regulated bank procurement teams frequently rule it out at the vendor risk stage rather than on capability.
- Support responsiveness scales with contract size, and pay as you go customers have limited recourse when a document type suddenly starts failing in one market.
- Country coverage is broad but uneven in depth, meaning the same product can perform very differently across two markets you are launching in simultaneously.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Shufti Pro
On request- Pay as you go$undefined/month
- Consumption billing with no annual commitment
- Rate quoted by sales, not published
- Resubmission sessions stated as not billable
- Monthly commitment$undefined/month
- Lower per-verification rate against a volume commitment
- AML screening and KYB priced as add-ons
- Free trial available before contracting
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Which should you pick?
Choose Shufti Pro if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want facial biometrics.
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Shufti Pro or Silent Eight better?
- Neither clearly leads. Shufti Pro starts at On request and Silent Eight at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Shufti Pro or Silent Eight?
- Shufti Pro starts at On request and Silent Eight at On request.
- Does Shufti Pro or Silent Eight run on more platforms?
- Shufti Pro runs on Web, iOS, Android. Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux.
- What is Shufti Pro best used for?
- Shufti Pro is most often used for a crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coverage, a gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economics, a gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phones, a startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volume. Of those, a crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coverage and a gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economics are not what Silent Eight is typically brought in for.
- What can Shufti Pro do that Silent Eight cannot?
- Shufti Pro covers Document verification, Facial biometrics, AML screening, KYB verification. Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Shufti Pro: Are failed attempts charged?
Shufti states that resubmission sessions are not charged and that billing follows successful verification attempts. Get that written into the contract, because it materially changes total cost.
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Shufti Pro: Is there a published price?
No. Plan structures are published but rates are quoted. Third party estimates put effective cost well below premium vendors.
Silent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Shufti Pro: Can we start without a commitment?
Yes. A pay as you go option exists, which is unusual in this category and useful for early stage volume.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Related pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Shufti Pro vs Sumsub
- Shufti Pro vs Jumio
- Shufti Pro vs Veriff
- Shufti Pro vs iDenfy
- Shufti Pro vs Socure
- Shufti Pro vs IDnow
- Shufti Pro vs Trulioo
- Shufti Pro vs Yoti
- Shufti Pro vs Quantexa
- Shufti Pro vs Fenergo
- Shufti Pro vs NICE Actimize
- Shufti Pro vs Signicat
- Shufti Pro vs Keeper Password Manager
- Shufti Pro vs Keygen
- Shufti Pro vs KnowBe4
- Shufti Pro vs Legit Security
- Shufti Pro vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Shufti Pro vs Metasploit
- Shufti Pro vs ThetaRay
- Shufti Pro vs Feedzai
- Shufti Pro vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Shufti Pro vs Sardine
- Shufti Pro vs Camio
- Shufti Pro vs Unit21
- Shufti Pro vs NordPass
- Shufti Pro vs One Identity
- Shufti Pro vs Ory Kratos
- Shufti Pro vs OWASP ZAP
- Shufti Pro vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Shufti Pro vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Veriff
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Socure
- Silent Eight vs IDnow
- Silent Eight vs Trulioo
- Silent Eight vs Yoti
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs Fenergo
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Signicat
- Silent Eight vs Keeper Password Manager
- Silent Eight vs Keygen
- Silent Eight vs KnowBe4
- Silent Eight vs Legit Security
- Silent Eight vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Silent Eight vs Metasploit
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
