Cybersecurity · head to head
Silent Eight vs Sumsub

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Sumsub
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening priced per verification
- From
- $1.35/verification
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.; Sumsub the published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- They diverge on capability: Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Sumsub covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Silent Eight and Sumsub actually diverge.
| Attribute | Silent Eight | Sumsub |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1.35/verification |
| Pricing model | quote | Per verification |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
Only in Sumsub
- Document verification
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- No-code flow builder
- Transaction monitoring
- Travel Rule
- Fraud and duplicate detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Sumsub
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Sumsub
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Sumsub
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Sumsub
Sumsub
- A crypto exchange needing KYC plus Travel Rule handling under one contractnot Silent Eight
- A gambling operator entering several European markets and needing document coverage without a separate vendor per countrynot Silent Eight
- A fintech that wants a published price it can model in a business case before speaking to a salespersonnot Silent Eight
- A marketplace verifying both individual sellers and the companies behind them without buying two productsnot Silent Eight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Sumsub
- The published per-verification rate is undercut by a monthly minimum of 149 or 299 dollars, so low volume businesses pay a much higher effective rate than the headline suggests.
- You are billed per verification attempt in most configurations, meaning applicant drop-off and resubmissions cost money without producing a customer.
- Pass rates and document support vary noticeably by country, and a market that works well in Europe can produce materially worse rejection rates in parts of Africa and South East Asia.
- The AML screening tier bundles list coverage that large institutions would normally buy separately and tune, giving less control over match thresholds than a dedicated screening vendor.
- The company originated in Russia before restructuring to a UK entity, and some financial institutions still raise that history in vendor risk review, which can slow or block procurement at conservative banks.
Pricing, plan by plan
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Sumsub
$1.35/verification- Basic$1.35/verification
- 149 USD minimum monthly spend
- Document verification and liveness
- No-code flow builder
- Compliance$1.85/verification
- 299 USD minimum monthly spend
- Everything in Basic
- AML sanctions and PEP screening
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated volume rate
- Custom jurisdictions and languages
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Choose Sumsub if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want aml screening.
Questions people ask
- Is Silent Eight or Sumsub better?
- Neither clearly leads. Silent Eight starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Silent Eight or Sumsub?
- Silent Eight starts at On request and Sumsub at $1.35/verification.
- Does Silent Eight or Sumsub run on more platforms?
- Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux. Sumsub runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Silent Eight best used for?
- Silent Eight is most often used for a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches, a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts, a compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teams, an institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increase. Of those, a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches and a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts are not what Sumsub is typically brought in for.
- What can Silent Eight do that Sumsub cannot?
- Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance. Sumsub covers Document verification, AML screening, KYB verification, No-code flow builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Sumsub: What does a verification actually cost?
1.35 USD on Basic and 1.85 USD on Compliance, but with 149 and 299 USD monthly minimums respectively. Below roughly 110 or 160 checks a month you are paying the minimum, not the rate.
Silent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Sumsub: Do failed verifications get charged?
Attempts are generally billable, so a poor onboarding funnel raises your bill. Confirm the exact resubmission policy in your contract.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Sumsub: Does it cover business verification?
Yes, KYB with company registry lookups and beneficial owner resolution is part of the platform rather than a separate product.
Related pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Socure
- Silent Eight vs Signicat
- Silent Eight vs Trulioo
- Silent Eight vs Veriff
- Silent Eight vs IDnow
- Silent Eight vs Fenergo
- Silent Eight vs Yoti
- Silent Eight vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Silent Eight vs Mimecast
- Silent Eight vs Motorola Vigilant
- Silent Eight vs Nessus
- Sumsub vs NICE Actimize
- Sumsub vs Quantexa
- Sumsub vs ThetaRay
- Sumsub vs Feedzai
- Sumsub vs Jumio
- Sumsub vs iDenfy
- Sumsub vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sumsub vs Sardine
- Sumsub vs Camio
- Sumsub vs Unit21
- Sumsub vs Shufti Pro
- Sumsub vs NordPass
- Sumsub vs One Identity
- Sumsub vs Ory Kratos
- Sumsub vs OWASP ZAP
- Sumsub vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Sumsub vs Passbolt
- Sumsub vs Socure
- Sumsub vs Signicat
- Sumsub vs Trulioo
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs IDnow
- Sumsub vs Fenergo
- Sumsub vs Yoti
- Sumsub vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Sumsub vs Mimecast
- Sumsub vs Motorola Vigilant
- Sumsub vs Nessus
