Cybersecurity · head to head
Silent Eight vs Yoti

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yoti
Cybersecurity
Reusable digital identity, facial age estimation and identity verification
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.; Yoti age estimation returns a probabilistic range rather than a verified date of birth, so it only works with a safety buffer above the legal threshold and cannot prove an exact age.
- They diverge on capability: Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Yoti covers Facial age estimation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Silent Eight and Yoti actually diverge.
| Attribute | Silent Eight | Yoti |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web, iOS, Android, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
Only in Yoti
- Facial age estimation
- Reusable digital ID
- Identity verification
- UK right to work and rent
- Digital ID for retail
- Selective disclosure
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Yoti
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Yoti
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Yoti
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Yoti
Yoti
- A social platform meeting UK Online Safety Act age assurance duties without collecting identity documents from teenagersnot Silent Eight
- A supermarket removing staff interventions at self-checkout for age-restricted purchasesnot Silent Eight
- A UK employer running digital right-to-work checks under the certified trust framework rather than inspecting passportsnot Silent Eight
- A gambling operator needing an age gate with high completion rates before the account funding stepnot Silent Eight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Yoti
- Age estimation returns a probabilistic range rather than a verified date of birth, so it only works with a safety buffer above the legal threshold and cannot prove an exact age.
- Estimation accuracy varies by demographic and reported error margins widen at the age bands that matter most for eighteen-year thresholds, which pushes borderline users into a document fallback you still have to pay for.
- Pricing is not published, so buyers cannot compare the cost of an estimation check against a document check without going through sales.
- Regulatory acceptance of facial estimation differs by jurisdiction, so a method that satisfies Ofcom may not satisfy a regulator elsewhere and multi-market platforms need more than one approach.
- The reusable digital identity app depends on consumer adoption, which is meaningful in the UK and thin elsewhere, limiting the reusability benefit outside its home market.
Pricing, plan by plan
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Yoti
On request- Yoti Age and Identity Services$undefined/year
- Per-check pricing quoted by volume and method
- Age estimation, document verification and digital ID priced differently
- Right to work and right to rent checks quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Choose Yoti if
- You need facial age estimation.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want reusable digital id.
Questions people ask
- Is Silent Eight or Yoti better?
- Neither clearly leads. Silent Eight starts at On request and Yoti at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Silent Eight or Yoti?
- Silent Eight starts at On request and Yoti at On request.
- Does Silent Eight or Yoti run on more platforms?
- Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux. Yoti runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Silent Eight best used for?
- Silent Eight is most often used for a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches, a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts, a compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teams, an institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increase. Of those, a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches and a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts are not what Yoti is typically brought in for.
- What can Silent Eight do that Yoti cannot?
- Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance. Yoti covers Facial age estimation, Reusable digital ID, Identity verification, UK right to work and rent.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Yoti: Does age estimation store my face?
The image is used to produce an estimate and then deleted rather than retained, which is the specific property that makes it usable for age assurance on minors.
Silent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Yoti: Is it accepted for UK Online Safety Act compliance?
Facial age estimation is one of the methods regulators have accepted as highly effective age assurance. Confirm the current position with your own counsel for your content category.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Yoti: Can it prove someone is exactly 21?
No. It gives a range. If you need a precise age you need a document or database check, which Yoti also sells.
Related pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Veriff
- Silent Eight vs IDnow
- Silent Eight vs Trulioo
- Silent Eight vs Signicat
- Silent Eight vs Socure
- Silent Eight vs LogicManager
- Silent Eight vs Delinea
- Silent Eight vs Syft
- Silent Eight vs Very Good Security
- Silent Eight vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Silent Eight vs Windscribe
- Silent Eight vs authentik
- Silent Eight vs Avast One
- Silent Eight vs Chainguard
- Yoti vs NICE Actimize
- Yoti vs Quantexa
- Yoti vs ThetaRay
- Yoti vs Feedzai
- Yoti vs Jumio
- Yoti vs Sumsub
- Yoti vs iDenfy
- Yoti vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Yoti vs Sardine
- Yoti vs Camio
- Yoti vs Unit21
- Yoti vs Shufti Pro
- Yoti vs NordPass
- Yoti vs One Identity
- Yoti vs Ory Kratos
- Yoti vs OWASP ZAP
- Yoti vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Yoti vs Passbolt
- Yoti vs Veriff
- Yoti vs IDnow
- Yoti vs Trulioo
- Yoti vs Signicat
- Yoti vs Socure
- Yoti vs LogicManager
- Yoti vs Delinea
- Yoti vs Syft
- Yoti vs Very Good Security
- Yoti vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Yoti vs Windscribe
- Yoti vs authentik
- Yoti vs Avast One
- Yoti vs Chainguard
