Cybersecurity · head to head
Resolver vs Sweep

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Sweep has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.; Sweep limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- They diverge on capability: Resolver covers Incident management, Sweep covers Autocomplete.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Resolver and Sweep actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
Only in Sweep
- Autocomplete
- AI Agent
- Full codebase indexing
- Code review functionality
- Multi-IDE support
- GitHub integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Sweep
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Sweep
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Sweep
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Sweep
Sweep
- Accelerating code completion for JetBrains developersnot Resolver
- Automating refactoring tasks across codebasesnot Resolver
- Handling bug fixes with full repository contextnot Resolver
- Code review and quality assurancenot Resolver
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Sweep
- Limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- Free tier limited to 1,000 autocompletes per month
- API credit consumption varies by feature usage
- Performance dependent on codebase size and indexing quality
Pricing, plan by plan
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Sweep
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 autocompletes
- 5 USD API credits included
- All JetBrains IDEs supported
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Higher API credit allocation
- Priority support
- Ultra$60/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Maximum API credit allocation
- Extended context window
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Choose Sweep if
- You need autocomplete.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JetBrains IDEs.
- You also want ai agent.
Questions people ask
- Is Resolver or Sweep better?
- Neither clearly leads. Resolver starts at On request and Sweep at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Resolver or Sweep?
- Sweep has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Resolver and Free for Sweep.
- Does Resolver or Sweep run on more platforms?
- Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android. Sweep runs on JetBrains IDEs.
- Can I use Sweep for free?
- Yes. Sweep has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Resolver best used for?
- Resolver is most often used for a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling, a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email, a university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single record, an organisation that already retains kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platform. Of those, a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling and a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email are not what Sweep is typically brought in for.
- What can Resolver do that Sweep cannot?
- Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit. Sweep covers Autocomplete, AI Agent, Full codebase indexing, Code review functionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Sweep: What programming languages does Sweep support?
Sweep works with all programming languages supported by JetBrains IDEs, including Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, Kotlin, C++, and many others.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Sweep: Does Sweep retain my code data?
No. Sweep is SOC 2 Type II certified with zero data retention. Code is processed for suggestions but not stored.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Sweep: Can I cancel my Sweep subscription anytime?
Yes. You can cancel your subscription at any time from your account settings with no long-term commitments or cancellation fees.
SourceResolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
- Resolver vs GitHub Copilot
- Resolver vs Refact
- Resolver vs PhpStorm
- Resolver vs JetBrains Rider
- Resolver vs Pieces for Developers
- Resolver vs Cody
- Resolver vs Deep Code
- Resolver vs Pants Build
- Resolver vs Fig
- Resolver vs Namespace
- Resolver vs Nix
- Resolver vs Nixpacks
- Resolver vs Octopus Deploy
- Resolver vs Okteto
- Resolver vs OpsLevel
- Resolver vs RubyMine
- Resolver vs Sourcegraph
- Resolver vs GoLand
- Sweep vs LogicManager
- Sweep vs Diligent
- Sweep vs MetricStream
- Sweep vs NICE Actimize
- Sweep vs Omada Identity
- Sweep vs Sardine
- Sweep vs Silent Eight
- Sweep vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Sweep vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Sweep vs OneTrust
- Sweep vs Rhombus Systems
- Sweep vs Trulioo
- Sweep vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Sweep vs ExpressVPN
- Sweep vs Falco
- Sweep vs Fenergo
- Sweep vs Google Authenticator
- Sweep vs Grype
- Sweep vs GitHub Copilot
- Sweep vs Refact
- Sweep vs PhpStorm
- Sweep vs JetBrains Rider
- Sweep vs Pieces for Developers
- Sweep vs Cody
- Sweep vs Deep Code
- Sweep vs Pants Build
- Sweep vs Fig
- Sweep vs Namespace
- Sweep vs Nix
- Sweep vs Nixpacks
- Sweep vs Octopus Deploy
- Sweep vs Okteto
- Sweep vs OpsLevel
- Sweep vs RubyMine
- Sweep vs Sourcegraph
- Sweep vs GoLand

