Developer Tools · head to head
Octopus Deploy vs Resolver

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Octopus Deploy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Octopus Deploy and Resolver actually diverge.
| Attribute | Octopus Deploy | Resolver |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that Resolver does not also cover.
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Resolver
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Resolver
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Resolver
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Octopus Deploy
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Octopus Deploy
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Octopus Deploy
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Octopus Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4330/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2080/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24600/year
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Octopus Deploy or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Octopus Deploy or Resolver?
- Octopus Deploy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Octopus Deploy and On request for Resolver.
- Does Octopus Deploy or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Octopus Deploy runs on Web. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Octopus Deploy for free?
- Yes. Octopus Deploy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Octopus Deploy best used for?
- Octopus Deploy is most often used for automating software deployments across development, testing, production, automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response, managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configuration, tracking dora metrics and enforcing deployment approval gates. Of those, automating software deployments across development, testing, production and automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Octopus Deploy do that Resolver cannot?
- Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Octopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceResolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Octopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Octopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Octopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceResolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Octopus Deploy vs Visual Studio Code
- Octopus Deploy vs ESLint
- Octopus Deploy vs pnpm
- Octopus Deploy vs Turborepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Frappe
- Octopus Deploy vs Git
- Octopus Deploy vs GoLand
- Octopus Deploy vs Hookdeck
- Octopus Deploy vs JFrog Artifactory
- Octopus Deploy vs Namespace
- Octopus Deploy vs LogicManager
- Octopus Deploy vs Diligent
- Octopus Deploy vs MetricStream
- Octopus Deploy vs NICE Actimize
- Octopus Deploy vs Omada Identity
- Octopus Deploy vs Sardine
- Octopus Deploy vs Silent Eight
- Octopus Deploy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Octopus Deploy vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Octopus Deploy vs OneTrust
- Octopus Deploy vs Rhombus Systems
- Octopus Deploy vs Trulioo
- Octopus Deploy vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Octopus Deploy vs ExpressVPN
- Octopus Deploy vs Falco
- Octopus Deploy vs Fenergo
- Octopus Deploy vs Google Authenticator
- Octopus Deploy vs Grype
- Resolver vs Visual Studio Code
- Resolver vs ESLint
- Resolver vs pnpm
- Resolver vs Turborepo
- Resolver vs Harness
- Resolver vs HCP Terraform
- Resolver vs Earthly
- Resolver vs Moonrepo
- Resolver vs Ansible
- Resolver vs Argo CD
- Resolver vs Garden
- Resolver vs GitLab CI/CD
- Resolver vs Frappe
- Resolver vs Git
- Resolver vs GoLand
- Resolver vs Hookdeck
- Resolver vs JFrog Artifactory
- Resolver vs Namespace
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
