Cybersecurity · head to head
NICE Actimize vs Sweep

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Sweep has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: NICE Actimize modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.; Sweep limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- They diverge on capability: NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Sweep covers Autocomplete.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NICE Actimize and Sweep actually diverge.
| Attribute | NICE Actimize | Sweep |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Freemium with paid tiers |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | JetBrains IDEs |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2023 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
Only in Sweep
- Autocomplete
- AI Agent
- Full codebase indexing
- Code review functionality
- Multi-IDE support
- GitHub integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot Sweep
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot Sweep
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot Sweep
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot Sweep
Sweep
- Accelerating code completion for JetBrains developersnot NICE Actimize
- Automating refactoring tasks across codebasesnot NICE Actimize
- Handling bug fixes with full repository contextnot NICE Actimize
- Code review and quality assurancenot NICE Actimize
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals.
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days.
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour.
Sweep
- Limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- Free tier limited to 1,000 autocompletes per month
- API credit consumption varies by feature usage
- Performance dependent on codebase size and indexing quality
Pricing, plan by plan
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE Actimize$undefined/year
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
Sweep
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 autocompletes
- 5 USD API credits included
- All JetBrains IDEs supported
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Higher API credit allocation
- Priority support
- Ultra$60/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Maximum API credit allocation
- Extended context window
Which should you pick?
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Choose Sweep if
- You need autocomplete.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JetBrains IDEs.
- You also want ai agent.
Questions people ask
- Is NICE Actimize or Sweep better?
- Neither clearly leads. NICE Actimize starts at On request and Sweep at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NICE Actimize or Sweep?
- Sweep has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for NICE Actimize and Free for Sweep.
- Does NICE Actimize or Sweep run on more platforms?
- NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Sweep runs on JetBrains IDEs.
- Can I use Sweep for free?
- Yes. Sweep has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NICE Actimize starts at On request.
- What is NICE Actimize best used for?
- NICE Actimize is most often used for a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise, a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications, a regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governance, a payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch aml monitoring. Of those, a bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognise and a broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communications are not what Sweep is typically brought in for.
- What can NICE Actimize do that Sweep cannot?
- NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection. Sweep covers Autocomplete, AI Agent, Full codebase indexing, Code review functionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
Sweep: What programming languages does Sweep support?
Sweep works with all programming languages supported by JetBrains IDEs, including Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, Kotlin, C++, and many others.
SourceNICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
Sweep: Does Sweep retain my code data?
No. Sweep is SOC 2 Type II certified with zero data retention. Code is processed for suggestions but not stored.
SourceNICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
Sweep: Can I cancel my Sweep subscription anytime?
Yes. You can cancel your subscription at any time from your account settings with no long-term commitments or cancellation fees.
SourceRelated pages
More on NICE Actimize
Other head to heads
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs RoboForm
- NICE Actimize vs Semperis
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne
- NICE Actimize vs GitHub Copilot
- NICE Actimize vs Refact
- NICE Actimize vs PhpStorm
- NICE Actimize vs JetBrains Rider
- NICE Actimize vs Pieces for Developers
- NICE Actimize vs Cody
- NICE Actimize vs Deep Code
- NICE Actimize vs Pants Build
- NICE Actimize vs Fig
- NICE Actimize vs Namespace
- NICE Actimize vs Nix
- NICE Actimize vs Nixpacks
- NICE Actimize vs Octopus Deploy
- NICE Actimize vs Okteto
- NICE Actimize vs OpsLevel
- NICE Actimize vs RubyMine
- NICE Actimize vs Sourcegraph
- NICE Actimize vs GoLand
- Sweep vs Silent Eight
- Sweep vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sweep vs Quantexa
- Sweep vs Feedzai
- Sweep vs Unit21
- Sweep vs Fenergo
- Sweep vs Sardine
- Sweep vs ThetaRay
- Sweep vs Transmit Security
- Sweep vs Socure
- Sweep vs Sumsub
- Sweep vs Jumio
- Sweep vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Sweep vs Recorded Future
- Sweep vs RoboForm
- Sweep vs Semperis
- Sweep vs SentinelOne
- Sweep vs GitHub Copilot
- Sweep vs Refact
- Sweep vs PhpStorm
- Sweep vs JetBrains Rider
- Sweep vs Pieces for Developers
- Sweep vs Cody
- Sweep vs Deep Code
- Sweep vs Pants Build
- Sweep vs Fig
- Sweep vs Namespace
- Sweep vs Nix
- Sweep vs Nixpacks
- Sweep vs Octopus Deploy
- Sweep vs Okteto
- Sweep vs OpsLevel
- Sweep vs RubyMine
- Sweep vs Sourcegraph
- Sweep vs GoLand

