Cybersecurity · head to head
Diligent vs Sweep

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Sweep has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.; Sweep limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- They diverge on capability: Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Sweep covers Autocomplete.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Diligent and Sweep actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
Only in Sweep
- Autocomplete
- AI Agent
- Full codebase indexing
- Code review functionality
- Multi-IDE support
- GitHub integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Sweep
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Sweep
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Sweep
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Sweep
Sweep
- Accelerating code completion for JetBrains developersnot Diligent
- Automating refactoring tasks across codebasesnot Diligent
- Handling bug fixes with full repository contextnot Diligent
- Code review and quality assurancenot Diligent
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Sweep
- Limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- Free tier limited to 1,000 autocompletes per month
- API credit consumption varies by feature usage
- Performance dependent on codebase size and indexing quality
Pricing, plan by plan
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Sweep
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 autocompletes
- 5 USD API credits included
- All JetBrains IDEs supported
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Higher API credit allocation
- Priority support
- Ultra$60/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Maximum API credit allocation
- Extended context window
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Choose Sweep if
- You need autocomplete.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JetBrains IDEs.
- You also want ai agent.
Questions people ask
- Is Diligent or Sweep better?
- Neither clearly leads. Diligent starts at On request and Sweep at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Diligent or Sweep?
- Sweep has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Diligent and Free for Sweep.
- Does Diligent or Sweep run on more platforms?
- Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Sweep runs on JetBrains IDEs.
- Can I use Sweep for free?
- Yes. Sweep has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Diligent starts at On request.
- What is Diligent best used for?
- Diligent is most often used for a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system, an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine, a regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement finding, a group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reporting. Of those, a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system and an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine are not what Sweep is typically brought in for.
- What can Diligent do that Sweep cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management. Sweep covers Autocomplete, AI Agent, Full codebase indexing, Code review functionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Diligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Sweep: What programming languages does Sweep support?
Sweep works with all programming languages supported by JetBrains IDEs, including Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, Kotlin, C++, and many others.
SourceDiligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Sweep: Does Sweep retain my code data?
No. Sweep is SOC 2 Type II certified with zero data retention. Code is processed for suggestions but not stored.
SourceDiligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Sweep: Can I cancel my Sweep subscription anytime?
Yes. You can cancel your subscription at any time from your account settings with no long-term commitments or cancellation fees.
SourceDiligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs GitHub Copilot
- Diligent vs Refact
- Diligent vs PhpStorm
- Diligent vs JetBrains Rider
- Diligent vs Pieces for Developers
- Diligent vs Cody
- Diligent vs Deep Code
- Diligent vs Pants Build
- Diligent vs Fig
- Diligent vs Namespace
- Diligent vs Nix
- Diligent vs Nixpacks
- Diligent vs Octopus Deploy
- Diligent vs Okteto
- Diligent vs OpsLevel
- Diligent vs RubyMine
- Diligent vs Sourcegraph
- Diligent vs GoLand
- Sweep vs LogicManager
- Sweep vs Resolver
- Sweep vs MetricStream
- Sweep vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Sweep vs Transcend
- Sweep vs OneTrust
- Sweep vs Milestone XProtect
- Sweep vs Camio
- Sweep vs Delinea
- Sweep vs Dahua Technology
- Sweep vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sweep vs IBM QRadar
- Sweep vs Trivy
- Sweep vs Trulioo
- Sweep vs Unit21
- Sweep vs Veracode
- Sweep vs Very Good Security
- Sweep vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Sweep vs GitHub Copilot
- Sweep vs Refact
- Sweep vs PhpStorm
- Sweep vs JetBrains Rider
- Sweep vs Pieces for Developers
- Sweep vs Cody
- Sweep vs Deep Code
- Sweep vs Pants Build
- Sweep vs Fig
- Sweep vs Namespace
- Sweep vs Nix
- Sweep vs Nixpacks
- Sweep vs Octopus Deploy
- Sweep vs Okteto
- Sweep vs OpsLevel
- Sweep vs RubyMine
- Sweep vs Sourcegraph
- Sweep vs GoLand

