Cybersecurity · head to head
Quantexa vs Resolver
Quantexa
Cybersecurity
Entity resolution and network analytics for financial crime investigation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Quantexa pricing is never published and lands in the seven figure range annually for a tier one deployment, so it is out of reach for mid-sized institutions no matter how well the analytics would fit.; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: Quantexa covers Entity resolution, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Quantexa and Resolver actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Quantexa
- Entity resolution
- Network generation
- Contextual monitoring
- Investigation workspace
- Data fusion
- Deployment on customer cloud
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Quantexa
- A bank whose AML alert backlog is dominated by false positives and wants network context to close them fasternot Resolver
- Sanctions investigation where the sanctioned party is not the account holder but a connected director or shareholdernot Resolver
- Merging customer records across retail, commercial and wealth divisions after an acquisition to see total exposurenot Resolver
- A tax or benefits agency looking for organised fraud rings rather than individual claimantsnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Quantexa
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Quantexa
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Quantexa
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Quantexa
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Quantexa
- Pricing is never published and lands in the seven figure range annually for a tier one deployment, so it is out of reach for mid-sized institutions no matter how well the analytics would fit.
- Output quality is bounded by input data quality, and organisations without governed customer data spend the first phase of the programme fixing feeds rather than catching criminals.
- Implementation typically requires a systems integrator and runs into quarters rather than weeks, so the business case has to survive a long period with no operational benefit.
- The platform augments rather than replaces existing transaction monitoring, so you keep paying for the incumbent system alongside it and total compliance technology spend rises before it falls.
- Skills are scarce; the platform needs people who understand both Spark scale data engineering and financial crime typologies, and those people are hard to recruit and easy to lose.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Quantexa
On request- Quantexa Platform$undefined/year
- Entity resolution and network generation
- Deployed in customer cloud tenancy
- Priced by data volume and use case count
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Quantexa if
- You need entity resolution.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want network generation.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Quantexa or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Quantexa starts at On request and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Quantexa or Resolver?
- Quantexa starts at On request and Resolver at On request.
- Does Quantexa or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Quantexa runs on Web, Linux. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Quantexa best used for?
- Quantexa is most often used for a bank whose aml alert backlog is dominated by false positives and wants network context to close them faster, sanctions investigation where the sanctioned party is not the account holder but a connected director or shareholder, merging customer records across retail, commercial and wealth divisions after an acquisition to see total exposure, a tax or benefits agency looking for organised fraud rings rather than individual claimants. Of those, a bank whose aml alert backlog is dominated by false positives and wants network context to close them faster and sanctions investigation where the sanctioned party is not the account holder but a connected director or shareholder are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Quantexa do that Resolver cannot?
- Quantexa covers Entity resolution, Network generation, Contextual monitoring, Investigation workspace. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Quantexa: Does Quantexa replace our transaction monitoring system?
No. It usually sits alongside it, adding network context to the alerts that system generates and to investigations.
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Quantexa: Where does our data go?
Into your own cloud tenancy in the normal deployment model. Quantexa does not require you to send customer data to a shared multi-tenant service.
Resolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Quantexa: How is it priced?
Not publicly. Expect an annual subscription scaled by data volume and number of use cases, plus separate implementation cost.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Quantexa vs Silent Eight
- Quantexa vs NICE Actimize
- Quantexa vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Quantexa vs Feedzai
- Quantexa vs ThetaRay
- Quantexa vs Jumio
- Quantexa vs Fenergo
- Quantexa vs Sumsub
- Quantexa vs iDenfy
- Quantexa vs Shufti Pro
- Quantexa vs Unit21
- Quantexa vs Sardine
- Quantexa vs Syft
- Quantexa vs Trivy
- Quantexa vs Trulioo
- Quantexa vs Veracode
- Quantexa vs LogicManager
- Quantexa vs Diligent
- Quantexa vs MetricStream
- Quantexa vs Omada Identity
- Quantexa vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Quantexa vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Quantexa vs OneTrust
- Quantexa vs Rhombus Systems
- Quantexa vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Quantexa vs ExpressVPN
- Quantexa vs Falco
- Quantexa vs Google Authenticator
- Quantexa vs Grype
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Resolver vs Feedzai
- Resolver vs ThetaRay
- Resolver vs Jumio
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Sumsub
- Resolver vs iDenfy
- Resolver vs Shufti Pro
- Resolver vs Unit21
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Syft
- Resolver vs Trivy
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs Veracode
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype