Cybersecurity · head to head
Resolver vs Veracode
Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Veracode
Cybersecurity
Application risk management platform for finding and fixing software vulnerabilities.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.; Veracode no public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- They diverge on capability: Resolver covers Incident management, Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Resolver and Veracode actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
Only in Veracode
- Static analysis (SAST)
- Dynamic analysis (DAST)
- Software composition analysis
- AI-driven code remediation
- Container security
- Risk Manager (ASPM)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Veracode
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Veracode
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Veracode
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Veracode
Veracode
- Scanning applications for vulnerabilities across the SDLCnot Resolver
- Automating remediation of flagged security flaws with AInot Resolver
- Securing containerized workloads before deploymentnot Resolver
- Running penetration tests as a managed servicenot Resolver
- Enforcing security policy governance across many applicationsnot Resolver
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Veracode
- No public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Full platform capability spans many modules, which can require significant onboarding.
- Package Firewall and PTaaS are separate add-ons rather than included by default.
- Primarily built for enterprise scale, less suited to small individual projects.
Pricing, plan by plan
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Veracode
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Veracode review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Choose Veracode if
- You need static analysis (sast).
- You work on web, api.
- You also want dynamic analysis (dast).
Questions people ask
- Is Resolver or Veracode better?
- Neither clearly leads. Resolver starts at On request and Veracode at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Resolver or Veracode?
- Resolver starts at On request and Veracode at On request.
- Does Resolver or Veracode run on more platforms?
- Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android. Veracode runs on web, api.
- What is Resolver best used for?
- Resolver is most often used for a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling, a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email, a university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single record, an organisation that already retains kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platform. Of those, a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling and a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email are not what Veracode is typically brought in for.
- What can Resolver do that Veracode cannot?
- Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit. Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST), Dynamic analysis (DAST), Software composition analysis, AI-driven code remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Veracode: How does Veracode pricing work?
Veracode does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must request a personalized demo or contact sales to receive quotes tailored to their specific needs and usage volume.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Veracode: Does Veracode offer a free trial or free version?
No information about free trials or free versions is provided on Veracode's public website. Organizations must contact sales to discuss trial options.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
- Resolver vs Semgrep
- Resolver vs Legit Security
- Resolver vs Aikido
- Resolver vs Snyk
- Resolver vs Endor Labs
- Resolver vs Tenable
- Resolver vs Acunetix
- Resolver vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Resolver vs Recorded Future
- Resolver vs Tanium
- Resolver vs Trivy
- Resolver vs Quantexa
- Resolver vs Termly
- Resolver vs Transcend
- Resolver vs WireGuard
- Resolver vs Akeyless
- Resolver vs DataGrail
- Veracode vs LogicManager
- Veracode vs Diligent
- Veracode vs MetricStream
- Veracode vs NICE Actimize
- Veracode vs Omada Identity
- Veracode vs Sardine
- Veracode vs Silent Eight
- Veracode vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Veracode vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Veracode vs OneTrust
- Veracode vs Rhombus Systems
- Veracode vs Trulioo
- Veracode vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Veracode vs ExpressVPN
- Veracode vs Falco
- Veracode vs Fenergo
- Veracode vs Google Authenticator
- Veracode vs Grype
- Veracode vs Semgrep
- Veracode vs Legit Security
- Veracode vs Aikido
- Veracode vs Snyk
- Veracode vs Endor Labs
- Veracode vs Tenable
- Veracode vs Acunetix
- Veracode vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Veracode vs Recorded Future
- Veracode vs Tanium
- Veracode vs Trivy
- Veracode vs Quantexa
- Veracode vs Termly
- Veracode vs Transcend
- Veracode vs WireGuard
- Veracode vs Akeyless
- Veracode vs DataGrail