Manufacturing · head to head
IBM Maximo Application Suite vs OpenBOM

IBM Maximo Application Suite
Manufacturing
Enterprise asset management suite licensed by a shared pool of AppPoints rather than by named user
- From
- $3150/month
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM Maximo Application Suite appPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling, OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM Maximo Application Suite and OpenBOM actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM Maximo Application Suite | OpenBOM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3150/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per year by AppPoint pool | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux | Web, Windows, macOS, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoint pooling
- Maximo Manage
- Maximo Health and Predict
- Maximo Visual Inspection
- Industry solutions
- OpenShift deployment
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market CMMS cannot producenot OpenBOM
- An airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back yearsnot OpenBOM
- A manufacturer wanting condition-based maintenance and work order execution in the same system rather than integrating a predictive tool to a separate CMMSnot OpenBOM
- A defence or nuclear estate where the industry solution and long-term vendor viability matter more than the licence costnot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.
- Pools are commonly sized from headcount rather than concurrency and application mix, and licence reviews frequently find them over-provisioned by a large margin, meaning organisations pay for entitlement they never consume.
- Implementation, data migration, customisation and integrator fees routinely cost two to three times the first-year licence, so a business case built on the subscription figure will be materially wrong.
- MAS requires Red Hat OpenShift, which for a customer-hosted deployment adds a container platform, its licensing and the specialist administration skills to run it, none of which the previous standalone Maximo needed.
- Maximo is deep and slow to change; configuration is a specialist skill, upgrades are projects rather than updates, and organisations without a dedicated Maximo team end up permanently dependent on an implementation partner.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM Maximo Application Suite
$3150/month- Essentials (SaaS)$3150/month
- Entry SaaS tier for a small user population
- One production environment
- Core Manage functionality
- Standard (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Larger AppPoint pool
- Additional applications and environments
- Priced on application
- Premium (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Full application set including Predict and Visual Inspection
- Multiple environments
- Priced on application
- Customer hosted$undefined/year
- AppPoint entitlement bought outright and run on your own OpenShift cluster
- Infrastructure, OpenShift and administration costs are yours
- Annual support and subscription contract required
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM Maximo Application Suite if
- You need apppoint pooling.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want maximo manage.
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM Maximo Application Suite or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM Maximo Application Suite starts at $3150/month and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM Maximo Application Suite or OpenBOM?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3150/month for IBM Maximo Application Suite and Free for OpenBOM.
- Does IBM Maximo Application Suite or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- IBM Maximo Application Suite runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM Maximo Application Suite starts at $3150/month.
- What is IBM Maximo Application Suite best used for?
- IBM Maximo Application Suite is most often used for a transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market cmms cannot produce, an airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back years, a manufacturer wanting condition-based maintenance and work order execution in the same system rather than integrating a predictive tool to a separate cmms, a defence or nuclear estate where the industry solution and long-term vendor viability matter more than the licence cost. Of those, a transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market cmms cannot produce and an airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back years are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM Maximo Application Suite do that OpenBOM cannot?
- IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling, Maximo Manage, Maximo Health and Predict, Maximo Visual Inspection. OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Is Maximo still sold per user?
No. The Maximo Application Suite licenses a shared AppPoint pool consumed by users, applications and environments. Per-seat Maximo is the old model.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: What does the entry SaaS tier cost?
The Essentials package starts around $3,150 per month for a small user population and one production environment. Larger tiers are quoted.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Do non-production environments cost AppPoints?
Yes. Development, test and training environments draw from the same pool, which is the most common sizing surprise.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Can I run MAS without OpenShift?
No. OpenShift is the deployment platform whether you host it yourself or consume MAS as a service from IBM.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
More on IBM Maximo Application Suite
Other head to heads
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs eMaint
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Maintenance Connection
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Hippo CMMS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Sight Machine
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Aras Innovator
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SolidWorks
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs COPA-DATA zenon
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Ignition
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SKF Enlight Centre
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Markforged Eiger
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Materialise Magics
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs MOVUS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oden Technologies
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oqton
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Fusion 360
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Duro PLM
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs PTC Windchill
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Propel
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Seeq
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs AVEVA System Platform
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs AMFG
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Authentise
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Autodesk Netfabb
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs eMaint
- OpenBOM vs Maintenance Connection
- OpenBOM vs Hippo CMMS
- OpenBOM vs Sight Machine
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs SKF Enlight Centre
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs Markforged Eiger
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs MOVUS
- OpenBOM vs Oden Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Oqton
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
