Manufacturing · head to head
Authentise vs IBM Maximo Application Suite

Authentise
Manufacturing
Modular MES and workflow automation for additive manufacturing, with ITAR-capable deployment options
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IBM Maximo Application Suite
Manufacturing
Enterprise asset management suite licensed by a shared pool of AppPoints rather than by named user
- From
- $3150/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authentise nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.; IBM Maximo Application Suite appPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.
- They diverge on capability: Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authentise and IBM Maximo Application Suite actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authentise | IBM Maximo Application Suite |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3150/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per year by AppPoint pool |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authentise
- Additive workflow automation
- Machine data capture
- Traceability
- Modular deployment
- ITAR-capable hosting
- Scheduling
Only in IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoint pooling
- Maximo Manage
- Maximo Health and Predict
- Maximo Visual Inspection
- Industry solutions
- OpenShift deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authentise
- An additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendorsnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- An aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidencenot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under ITAR-compliant hostingnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sitesnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market CMMS cannot producenot Authentise
- An airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back yearsnot Authentise
- A manufacturer wanting condition-based maintenance and work order execution in the same system rather than integrating a predictive tool to a separate CMMSnot Authentise
- A defence or nuclear estate where the industry solution and long-term vendor viability matter more than the licence costnot Authentise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authentise
- Nothing is published about price, and modular licensing means the quoted entry module rarely resembles the cost of a configuration that actually runs a production floor.
- It is additive-specific, so a shop with significant machining, casting or fabrication work still needs a second MES and an integration between them.
- The ITAR-capable deployment that justifies the price is irrelevant to purely commercial shops, which then find the system expensive relative to general manufacturing software.
- Integrating with the ERP and PLM systems that already hold part and order data is project work, and the burden falls on a small vendor rather than a large systems integrator ecosystem.
- Company scale is modest against the industrial software incumbents, which is a real consideration for a system sitting in the traceability path of qualified aerospace parts.
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.
- Pools are commonly sized from headcount rather than concurrency and application mix, and licence reviews frequently find them over-provisioned by a large margin, meaning organisations pay for entitlement they never consume.
- Implementation, data migration, customisation and integrator fees routinely cost two to three times the first-year licence, so a business case built on the subscription figure will be materially wrong.
- MAS requires Red Hat OpenShift, which for a customer-hosted deployment adds a container platform, its licensing and the specialist administration skills to run it, none of which the previous standalone Maximo needed.
- Maximo is deep and slow to change; configuration is a specialist skill, upgrades are projects rather than updates, and organisations without a dedicated Maximo team end up permanently dependent on an implementation partner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authentise
On request- Authentise Flows and MES modules$undefined/year
- Modular licensing by function
- Public cloud, private SaaS or ITAR-compliant deployment
- Machine data capture and traceability
IBM Maximo Application Suite
$3150/month- Essentials (SaaS)$3150/month
- Entry SaaS tier for a small user population
- One production environment
- Core Manage functionality
- Standard (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Larger AppPoint pool
- Additional applications and environments
- Priced on application
- Premium (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Full application set including Predict and Visual Inspection
- Multiple environments
- Priced on application
- Customer hosted$undefined/year
- AppPoint entitlement bought outright and run on your own OpenShift cluster
- Infrastructure, OpenShift and administration costs are yours
- Annual support and subscription contract required
Which should you pick?
Choose Authentise if
- You need additive workflow automation.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want machine data capture.
Choose IBM Maximo Application Suite if
- You need apppoint pooling.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want maximo manage.
Questions people ask
- Is Authentise or IBM Maximo Application Suite better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authentise starts at On request and IBM Maximo Application Suite at $3150/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authentise or IBM Maximo Application Suite?
- Authentise starts at On request and IBM Maximo Application Suite at $3150/month.
- Does Authentise or IBM Maximo Application Suite run on more platforms?
- Authentise runs on Web, API. IBM Maximo Application Suite runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux.
- What is Authentise best used for?
- Authentise is most often used for an additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendors, an aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidence, a defence programme requiring export-controlled geometry handled under itar-compliant hosting, a corporate additive team standardising build preparation and post-processing steps across sites. Of those, an additive service bureau tracking jobs across a mixed fleet of printers from several vendors and an aerospace supplier that needs powder batch to part traceability as qualification evidence are not what IBM Maximo Application Suite is typically brought in for.
- What can Authentise do that IBM Maximo Application Suite cannot?
- Authentise covers Additive workflow automation, Machine data capture, Traceability, Modular deployment. IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling, Maximo Manage, Maximo Health and Predict, Maximo Visual Inspection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authentise: How is Authentise priced?
It is not published. Licensing is modular and quoted annually, with integration and onboarding priced separately.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Is Maximo still sold per user?
No. The Maximo Application Suite licenses a shared AppPoint pool consumed by users, applications and environments. Per-seat Maximo is the old model.
Authentise: Can it handle ITAR-controlled work?
Yes. It offers ITAR-compliant deployment alongside public cloud and private SaaS, which is a primary reason defence suppliers choose it.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: What does the entry SaaS tier cost?
The Essentials package starts around $3,150 per month for a small user population and one production environment. Larger tiers are quoted.
Authentise: Does it work with printers from more than one manufacturer?
Yes. It is designed for mixed fleets and captures machine data across vendors, which single-vendor software will not do.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Do non-production environments cost AppPoints?
Yes. Development, test and training environments draw from the same pool, which is the most common sizing surprise.
Authentise: Is it a full MES for a general machine shop?
No. It is built around additive workflows; subtractive-heavy shops need a general MES as well.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Can I run MAS without OpenShift?
No. OpenShift is the deployment platform whether you host it yourself or consume MAS as a service from IBM.
Related pages
More on IBM Maximo Application Suite
Other head to heads
- Authentise vs Fulcrum
- Authentise vs Tulip
- Authentise vs MachineMetrics
- Authentise vs Oqton
- Authentise vs 3YOURMIND
- Authentise vs Prodsmart
- Authentise vs TrakSYS
- Authentise vs AMFG
- Authentise vs Materialise Magics
- Authentise vs Flow Software
- Authentise vs ProShop ERP
- Authentise vs Ignition
- Authentise vs QAD Redzone
- Authentise vs Seeq
- Authentise vs Sensemore
- Authentise vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Authentise vs Simplify3D
- Authentise vs TrendMiner
- Authentise vs eMaint
- Authentise vs Maintenance Connection
- Authentise vs Hippo CMMS
- Authentise vs Sight Machine
- Authentise vs Aras Innovator
- Authentise vs SolidWorks
- Authentise vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Authentise vs OpenBOM
- Authentise vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Authentise vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Authentise vs Markforged Eiger
- Authentise vs MOVUS
- Authentise vs Oden Technologies
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Fulcrum
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Tulip
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs MachineMetrics
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oqton
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs 3YOURMIND
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Prodsmart
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs TrakSYS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs AMFG
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Materialise Magics
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Flow Software
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs ProShop ERP
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Ignition
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs QAD Redzone
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Seeq
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Sensemore
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Simplify3D
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs TrendMiner
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs eMaint
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Maintenance Connection
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Hippo CMMS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Sight Machine
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Aras Innovator
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SolidWorks
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs COPA-DATA zenon
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs OpenBOM
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SKF Enlight Centre
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Markforged Eiger
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs MOVUS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oden Technologies
