Manufacturing · head to head
Duro PLM vs IBM Maximo Application Suite

Duro PLM
Manufacturing
Hosted PLM for hardware startups, sold in fixed user bands with no published price
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IBM Maximo Application Suite
Manufacturing
Enterprise asset management suite licensed by a shared pool of AppPoints rather than by named user
- From
- $3150/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Duro PLM no pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.; IBM Maximo Application Suite appPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.
- They diverge on capability: Duro PLM covers Part library, IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duro PLM and IBM Maximo Application Suite actually diverge.
| Attribute | Duro PLM | IBM Maximo Application Suite |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3150/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per year by AppPoint pool |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duro PLM
- Part library
- Multi-level BOMs
- Change orders
- CAD integrations
- Supplier and cost data
- User band plans
Only in IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoint pooling
- Maximo Manage
- Maximo Health and Predict
- Maximo Visual Inspection
- Industry solutions
- OpenShift deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duro PLM
- A robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturernot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the BOMnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's BOM spreadsheet versionsnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production buildnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market CMMS cannot producenot Duro PLM
- An airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back yearsnot Duro PLM
- A manufacturer wanting condition-based maintenance and work order execution in the same system rather than integrating a predictive tool to a separate CMMSnot Duro PLM
- A defence or nuclear estate where the industry solution and long-term vendor viability matter more than the licence costnot Duro PLM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duro PLM
- No pricing is published anywhere, so budgeting requires a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare against alternatives without entering a pipeline.
- Plans are sold in fixed user bands rather than per seat, so hiring an eleventh engineer moves you to the next tier instead of adding one seat.
- Storage allowances are capped at 25, 50 and 100 GB, which is tight for teams keeping native CAD files rather than only neutral formats.
- There is no self-hosted or on-premises option, which rules Duro out for defence and some aerospace suppliers with data residency or ITAR handling constraints.
- Scope stops at engineering data: no requirements management, no quality module and no manufacturing process planning, so it does not replace the systems a company needs at production scale.
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.
- Pools are commonly sized from headcount rather than concurrency and application mix, and licence reviews frequently find them over-provisioned by a large margin, meaning organisations pay for entitlement they never consume.
- Implementation, data migration, customisation and integrator fees routinely cost two to three times the first-year licence, so a business case built on the subscription figure will be materially wrong.
- MAS requires Red Hat OpenShift, which for a customer-hosted deployment adds a container platform, its licensing and the specialist administration skills to run it, none of which the previous standalone Maximo needed.
- Maximo is deep and slow to change; configuration is a specialist skill, upgrades are projects rather than updates, and organisations without a dedicated Maximo team end up permanently dependent on an implementation partner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Duro PLM
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Up to 10 users
- 25 GB data storage
- Part library, BOMs and change orders
- Business$undefined/year
- Up to 20 users
- 50 GB data storage
- CAD integrations
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 20 or more users
- 100 GB data storage
- Extended support
IBM Maximo Application Suite
$3150/month- Essentials (SaaS)$3150/month
- Entry SaaS tier for a small user population
- One production environment
- Core Manage functionality
- Standard (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Larger AppPoint pool
- Additional applications and environments
- Priced on application
- Premium (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Full application set including Predict and Visual Inspection
- Multiple environments
- Priced on application
- Customer hosted$undefined/year
- AppPoint entitlement bought outright and run on your own OpenShift cluster
- Infrastructure, OpenShift and administration costs are yours
- Annual support and subscription contract required
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM Maximo Application Suite if
- You need apppoint pooling.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want maximo manage.
Questions people ask
- Is Duro PLM or IBM Maximo Application Suite better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duro PLM starts at On request and IBM Maximo Application Suite at $3150/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duro PLM or IBM Maximo Application Suite?
- Duro PLM starts at On request and IBM Maximo Application Suite at $3150/month.
- Does Duro PLM or IBM Maximo Application Suite run on more platforms?
- Duro PLM runs on Web. IBM Maximo Application Suite runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux.
- What is Duro PLM best used for?
- Duro PLM is most often used for a robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturer, a consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the bom, a hardware company whose engineers keep overwriting each other's bom spreadsheet versions, a venture-funded startup that needs a defensible change history before a first production build. Of those, a robotics startup imposing change control on a design before releasing it to a contract manufacturer and a consumer electronics team tracking supplier part numbers and costs against every item in the bom are not what IBM Maximo Application Suite is typically brought in for.
- What can Duro PLM do that IBM Maximo Application Suite cannot?
- Duro PLM covers Part library, Multi-level BOMs, Change orders, CAD integrations. IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling, Maximo Manage, Maximo Health and Predict, Maximo Visual Inspection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duro PLM: How much does Duro cost?
Duro does not publish prices. Plans are fixed annual subscriptions quoted by sales against a user band, billed Net 30.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Is Maximo still sold per user?
No. The Maximo Application Suite licenses a shared AppPoint pool consumed by users, applications and environments. Per-seat Maximo is the old model.
Duro PLM: Can I run Duro on my own servers?
No. It is cloud only, which is a hard blocker for organisations with data residency or export control requirements.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: What does the entry SaaS tier cost?
The Essentials package starts around $3,150 per month for a small user population and one production environment. Larger tiers are quoted.
Duro PLM: What happens when we exceed our user band?
You move to the next tier rather than adding individual seats, so growth arrives as a step change in cost.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Do non-production environments cost AppPoints?
Yes. Development, test and training environments draw from the same pool, which is the most common sizing surprise.
Duro PLM: Is Duro suitable for medical device work?
Its change control is real but the workflow configuration and audit depth are lighter than dedicated regulated-industry PLM, so most ISO 13485 programmes need more.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Can I run MAS without OpenShift?
No. OpenShift is the deployment platform whether you host it yourself or consume MAS as a service from IBM.
Related pages
More on IBM Maximo Application Suite
Other head to heads
- Duro PLM vs Fusion 360
- Duro PLM vs PTC Windchill
- Duro PLM vs Aras Innovator
- Duro PLM vs OpenBOM
- Duro PLM vs Propel
- Duro PLM vs Augury
- Duro PLM vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Duro PLM vs KCF Technologies
- Duro PLM vs MOVUS
- Duro PLM vs Sight Machine
- Duro PLM vs TrakSYS
- Duro PLM vs AMFG
- Duro PLM vs Authentise
- Duro PLM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Duro PLM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Duro PLM vs Arena PLM
- Duro PLM vs eMaint
- Duro PLM vs Maintenance Connection
- Duro PLM vs Hippo CMMS
- Duro PLM vs SolidWorks
- Duro PLM vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Duro PLM vs Ignition
- Duro PLM vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Duro PLM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Duro PLM vs Markforged Eiger
- Duro PLM vs Materialise Magics
- Duro PLM vs Oden Technologies
- Duro PLM vs Oqton
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Fusion 360
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs PTC Windchill
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Aras Innovator
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs OpenBOM
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Propel
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Augury
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs KCF Technologies
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs MOVUS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Sight Machine
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs TrakSYS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs AMFG
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Authentise
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs COPA-DATA zenon
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Autodesk Netfabb
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Arena PLM
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs eMaint
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Maintenance Connection
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Hippo CMMS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SolidWorks
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Ignition
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SKF Enlight Centre
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Markforged Eiger
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Materialise Magics
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oden Technologies
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oqton
