Manufacturing · head to head
AVEVA System Platform vs IBM Maximo Application Suite

AVEVA System Platform
Manufacturing
Supervisory HMI and SCADA platform, formerly sold as Wonderware System Platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IBM Maximo Application Suite
Manufacturing
Enterprise asset management suite licensed by a shared pool of AppPoints rather than by named user
- From
- $3150/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AVEVA System Platform wonderware is no longer a name you can buy; if you have inherited documentation, purchase orders or job specifications that say Wonderware, everything has to be re-mapped to AVEVA product names before you can quote it.; IBM Maximo Application Suite appPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.
- They diverge on capability: AVEVA System Platform covers ArchestrA object model, IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AVEVA System Platform and IBM Maximo Application Suite actually diverge.
| Attribute | AVEVA System Platform | IBM Maximo Application Suite |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3150/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per year by AppPoint pool |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AVEVA System Platform
- ArchestrA object model
- InTouch HMI
- AVEVA Historian
- Redundancy
- Situational awareness graphics
- OMI
- Alarm management
- Connectivity
Only in IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoint pooling
- Maximo Manage
- Maximo Health and Predict
- Maximo Visual Inspection
- Industry solutions
- OpenShift deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AVEVA System Platform
- A multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different PLC brandsnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A water utility with a decade of ArchestrA templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justifiednot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A pharmaceutical line needing ISA-88 batch recipe handling above existing Rockwell and Siemens controllersnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A plant modernising legacy InTouch applications without discarding the existing screens and scriptsnot IBM Maximo Application Suite
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- A transmission utility managing hundreds of thousands of linear and point assets with regulatory reporting that a mid-market CMMS cannot producenot AVEVA System Platform
- An airline or rail operator needing configuration control and maintenance history depth that survives a regulator audit going back yearsnot AVEVA System Platform
- A manufacturer wanting condition-based maintenance and work order execution in the same system rather than integrating a predictive tool to a separate CMMSnot AVEVA System Platform
- A defence or nuclear estate where the industry solution and long-term vendor viability matter more than the licence costnot AVEVA System Platform
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AVEVA System Platform
- Wonderware is no longer a name you can buy; if you have inherited documentation, purchase orders or job specifications that say Wonderware, everything has to be re-mapped to AVEVA product names before you can quote it.
- AVEVA Flex converts licensing to a recurring subscription draw-down, so organisations that budgeted for a perpetual licence with a support percentage face a materially different cost model at renewal.
- It is Windows only, and version compatibility between System Platform, Historian and InTouch is tight, so upgrades are coordinated projects rather than incremental patches.
- The ArchestrA object model has a steep learning curve and small systems end up paying for structure they do not need, which is why integrators often deploy standalone InTouch instead.
- Licence enforcement counts I/O aggressively and unexpected tag growth during commissioning can trigger a mid-project licence purchase at list price.
IBM Maximo Application Suite
- AppPoints are consumed by users, applications and environments at once, so a routine decision like adding a test environment or enabling Health quietly eats pool capacity and can trigger a true-up nobody budgeted for.
- Pools are commonly sized from headcount rather than concurrency and application mix, and licence reviews frequently find them over-provisioned by a large margin, meaning organisations pay for entitlement they never consume.
- Implementation, data migration, customisation and integrator fees routinely cost two to three times the first-year licence, so a business case built on the subscription figure will be materially wrong.
- MAS requires Red Hat OpenShift, which for a customer-hosted deployment adds a container platform, its licensing and the specialist administration skills to run it, none of which the previous standalone Maximo needed.
- Maximo is deep and slow to change; configuration is a specialist skill, upgrades are projects rather than updates, and organisations without a dedicated Maximo team end up permanently dependent on an implementation partner.
Pricing, plan by plan
AVEVA System Platform
On request- AVEVA System Platform$undefined/year
- Licensed by I/O count, client count and platform nodes
- Sold through AVEVA Flex subscription token pool or legacy perpetual licence
- Legacy perpetual licences carry an annual customer FIRST support fee
IBM Maximo Application Suite
$3150/month- Essentials (SaaS)$3150/month
- Entry SaaS tier for a small user population
- One production environment
- Core Manage functionality
- Standard (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Larger AppPoint pool
- Additional applications and environments
- Priced on application
- Premium (SaaS)$undefined/month
- Full application set including Predict and Visual Inspection
- Multiple environments
- Priced on application
- Customer hosted$undefined/year
- AppPoint entitlement bought outright and run on your own OpenShift cluster
- Infrastructure, OpenShift and administration costs are yours
- Annual support and subscription contract required
Which should you pick?
Choose AVEVA System Platform if
- You need archestra object model.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want intouch hmi.
Choose IBM Maximo Application Suite if
- You need apppoint pooling.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want maximo manage.
Questions people ask
- Is AVEVA System Platform or IBM Maximo Application Suite better?
- Neither clearly leads. AVEVA System Platform starts at On request and IBM Maximo Application Suite at $3150/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AVEVA System Platform or IBM Maximo Application Suite?
- AVEVA System Platform starts at On request and IBM Maximo Application Suite at $3150/month.
- Does AVEVA System Platform or IBM Maximo Application Suite run on more platforms?
- AVEVA System Platform runs on Windows. IBM Maximo Application Suite runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise, iOS, Android, Linux.
- What is AVEVA System Platform best used for?
- AVEVA System Platform is most often used for a multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different plc brands, a water utility with a decade of archestra templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justified, a pharmaceutical line needing isa-88 batch recipe handling above existing rockwell and siemens controllers, a plant modernising legacy intouch applications without discarding the existing screens and scripts. Of those, a multi-site food manufacturer standardising operator screens across plants that run different plc brands and a water utility with a decade of archestra templates where rewriting to another platform cannot be justified are not what IBM Maximo Application Suite is typically brought in for.
- What can AVEVA System Platform do that IBM Maximo Application Suite cannot?
- AVEVA System Platform covers ArchestrA object model, InTouch HMI, AVEVA Historian, Redundancy. IBM Maximo Application Suite covers AppPoint pooling, Maximo Manage, Maximo Health and Predict, Maximo Visual Inspection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AVEVA System Platform: Is Wonderware still sold?
No. The brand was retired; buy AVEVA System Platform, AVEVA InTouch HMI, AVEVA Historian or AVEVA Plant SCADA instead.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Is Maximo still sold per user?
No. The Maximo Application Suite licenses a shared AppPoint pool consumed by users, applications and environments. Per-seat Maximo is the old model.
AVEVA System Platform: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
AVEVA steers new business to Flex subscriptions. Perpetual is increasingly restricted to existing agreements and renewals.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: What does the entry SaaS tier cost?
The Essentials package starts around $3,150 per month for a small user population and one production environment. Larger tiers are quoted.
AVEVA System Platform: Do my old InTouch applications still run?
Yes, legacy InTouch applications are supported in System Platform, though the older graphics do not gain the newer situational-awareness features without rework.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Do non-production environments cost AppPoints?
Yes. Development, test and training environments draw from the same pool, which is the most common sizing surprise.
AVEVA System Platform: What is AVEVA Flex?
A subscription credit pool you draw against for any AVEVA product, which trades a fixed licence for a recurring balance you must keep topped up.
IBM Maximo Application Suite: Can I run MAS without OpenShift?
No. OpenShift is the deployment platform whether you host it yourself or consume MAS as a service from IBM.
Related pages
More on AVEVA System Platform
More on IBM Maximo Application Suite
Other head to heads
- AVEVA System Platform vs Ignition
- AVEVA System Platform vs ABB 800xA
- AVEVA System Platform vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- AVEVA System Platform vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- AVEVA System Platform vs GENESIS Version 11
- AVEVA System Platform vs COPA-DATA zenon
- AVEVA System Platform vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- AVEVA System Platform vs Seeq
- AVEVA System Platform vs SolidWorks
- AVEVA System Platform vs Materialise Magics
- AVEVA System Platform vs Aras Innovator
- AVEVA System Platform vs Propel
- AVEVA System Platform vs KCF Technologies
- AVEVA System Platform vs LabVIEW
- AVEVA System Platform vs SKF Enlight Centre
- AVEVA System Platform vs Hippo CMMS
- AVEVA System Platform vs eMaint
- AVEVA System Platform vs Maintenance Connection
- AVEVA System Platform vs Sight Machine
- AVEVA System Platform vs OpenBOM
- AVEVA System Platform vs Markforged Eiger
- AVEVA System Platform vs MOVUS
- AVEVA System Platform vs Oden Technologies
- AVEVA System Platform vs Oqton
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Ignition
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs ABB 800xA
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs GENESIS Version 11
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs COPA-DATA zenon
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Seeq
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SolidWorks
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Materialise Magics
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Aras Innovator
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Propel
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs KCF Technologies
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs LabVIEW
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs SKF Enlight Centre
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Hippo CMMS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs eMaint
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Maintenance Connection
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Sight Machine
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs OpenBOM
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Markforged Eiger
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs MOVUS
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oden Technologies
- IBM Maximo Application Suite vs Oqton
