Logging · head to head
New Relic vs Zipkin
The short version
- Each has a real cost: New Relic data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult; Zipkin less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- They diverge on capability: New Relic covers APM, Zipkin covers Trace collection and search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which New Relic and Zipkin actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in New Relic
- APM
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Log Management
- Browser Monitoring
- Synthetic Monitoring
- Mobile Monitoring
- Kubernetes Monitoring
- AI Ops
Only in Zipkin
- Trace collection and search
- Dependency diagram
- Simple deployment
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
New Relic
- Application monitoringnot Zipkin
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Zipkin
- Error trackingnot Zipkin
- Performance optimizationnot Zipkin
Zipkin
- Adding distributed tracing quickly without standing up heavy infrastructurenot New Relic
- Java and Spring Boot estates, where instrumentation support is long-establishednot New Relic
- Small deployments where Jaeger is more than the problem requiresnot New Relic
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
New Relic
- Data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- Core user licensing model adds complexity to pricing with distinction between full platform users and basic users
- Default logs obfuscation may miss some sensitive patterns requiring custom configuration
- Retention limits even on paid tiers require additional storage for long-term compliance requirements
Zipkin
- Less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- Fewer features: sampling, storage options and UI are all more limited
- The interface is dated and slower to work with on large trace volumes
- Tracing alone still leaves metrics and logs in separate tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
New Relic
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the New Relic review.
Zipkin
Free- ZipkinFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose New Relic if
- You need apm.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
- You also want infrastructure monitoring.
Choose Zipkin if
- You need trace collection and search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want dependency diagram.
Questions people ask
- Is New Relic or Zipkin better?
- Neither clearly leads. New Relic starts at Free and Zipkin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, New Relic or Zipkin?
- New Relic starts at Free and Zipkin at Free.
- Does New Relic or Zipkin run on more platforms?
- New Relic runs on Web, Api, Mobile. Zipkin runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use New Relic for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is New Relic best used for?
- New Relic is most often used for application monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, error tracking, performance optimization. Of those, application monitoring and infrastructure monitoring are not what Zipkin is typically brought in for.
- What can New Relic do that Zipkin cannot?
- New Relic covers APM, Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Browser Monitoring. Zipkin covers Trace collection and search, Dependency diagram, Simple deployment, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
New Relic: Does New Relic offer a free tier?
Yes, New Relic's free tier is perpetual with no credit card required. It includes 100 GB of free data ingest monthly, one Full Platform User with access to all 50+ capabilities, and unlimited Basic Users for querying and dashboard creation.
SourceZipkin: Is Zipkin free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
New Relic: How much does New Relic cost for paid plans?
Paid plans start at $49 per month per core user. New Relic uses consumption-based pricing where you pay only for what you use. Annual commitment options are available with volume discounts for larger teams.
SourceZipkin: Zipkin or Jaeger?
Jaeger has more momentum, more features and CNCF backing. Zipkin is lighter and quicker to stand up, and remains well supported in the Java and Spring ecosystem.
New Relic: What data retention is included in New Relic's free tier?
The free tier includes a minimum of 8 days data retention for troubleshooting. Paid plans offer extended retention periods and customizable data retention policies.
SourceZipkin: Does Zipkin work with OpenTelemetry?
Yes. OpenTelemetry can export to Zipkin, which is now the usual way to instrument for it.
New Relic: How many integrations does New Relic support?
New Relic provides access to 780+ integrations and unlimited hosts at no additional cost. These include monitoring integrations for various cloud services, databases, and applications.
SourceNew Relic: Can I use New Relic to monitor multiple cloud providers?
Yes, New Relic is cloud-agnostic and supports monitoring across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and on-premises infrastructure in a single platform.
SourceNew Relic: What is New Relic's ownership structure today?
New Relic was acquired by TPG and Francisco Partners on July 31, 2023, for $6.5 billion and transitioned from a publicly traded company to a private company in November 2023.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- New Relic vs CloudWatch
- New Relic vs Elastic APM
- New Relic vs Fluent Bit
- New Relic vs Loggly
- New Relic vs Datadog Logs
- New Relic vs Coralogix
- New Relic vs Grafana Loki
- New Relic vs Dynatrace
- New Relic vs Airbrake
- New Relic vs AppDynamics
- New Relic vs Better Stack
- New Relic vs Bugsnag
- New Relic vs Elastic Stack
- New Relic vs Fluentd
- New Relic vs Dynatrace Logs
- New Relic vs Elastic
- New Relic vs Elasticsearch Service
- New Relic vs Jaeger
- New Relic vs Grafana Cloud
- New Relic vs VictoriaMetrics
- New Relic vs Deno Deploy
- New Relic vs Anyscale
- New Relic vs Cerebrium
- New Relic vs Go
- New Relic vs Orca Security
- New Relic vs Heroku
- New Relic vs Vault
- New Relic vs Beam Cloud
- New Relic vs Caddy
- New Relic vs DeepInfra
- New Relic vs OpenTelemetry
- New Relic vs Thanos
- New Relic vs Linkerd
- New Relic vs Longhorn
- Zipkin vs CloudWatch
- Zipkin vs Elastic APM
- Zipkin vs Fluent Bit
- Zipkin vs Loggly
- Zipkin vs Datadog Logs
- Zipkin vs Coralogix
- Zipkin vs Grafana Loki
- Zipkin vs Dynatrace
- Zipkin vs Airbrake
- Zipkin vs AppDynamics
- Zipkin vs Better Stack
- Zipkin vs Bugsnag
- Zipkin vs Elastic Stack
- Zipkin vs Fluentd
- Zipkin vs Dynatrace Logs
- Zipkin vs Elastic
- Zipkin vs Elasticsearch Service
- Zipkin vs Jaeger
- Zipkin vs Grafana Cloud
- Zipkin vs VictoriaMetrics
- Zipkin vs Deno Deploy
- Zipkin vs Anyscale
- Zipkin vs Cerebrium
- Zipkin vs Go
- Zipkin vs Orca Security
- Zipkin vs Heroku
- Zipkin vs Vault
- Zipkin vs Beam Cloud
- Zipkin vs Caddy
- Zipkin vs DeepInfra
- Zipkin vs OpenTelemetry
- Zipkin vs Thanos
- Zipkin vs Linkerd
- Zipkin vs Longhorn


