Cloud · head to head
Deno Deploy vs Zipkin
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Deno Deploy smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations; Zipkin less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- They diverge on capability: Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Zipkin covers Trace collection and search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Deno Deploy and Zipkin actually diverge.
| Attribute | Deno Deploy | Zipkin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Cloud/Web | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Deno Deploy
- Edge Functions
- Deno KV
- Automatic HTTPS
- Global Distribution
- Zero Config Deploy
- Git Integration
- Instant Rollbacks
- Web Standard APIs
Only in Zipkin
- Trace collection and search
- Dependency diagram
- Simple deployment
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Deno Deploy
- API endpointsnot Zipkin
- Edge functionsnot Zipkin
- Static sitesnot Zipkin
- Real-time appsnot Zipkin
Zipkin
- Adding distributed tracing quickly without standing up heavy infrastructurenot Deno Deploy
- Java and Spring Boot estates, where instrumentation support is long-establishednot Deno Deploy
- Small deployments where Jaeger is more than the problem requiresnot Deno Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Deno Deploy
- Smaller ecosystem compared to AWS Lambda with fewer third-party integrations
- Less mature than established serverless platforms; newer company and platform
- 1GB deployment size limit may restrict larger applications
- 512MB memory limit lower than some competitors for memory-intensive workloads
- Smaller user base and community compared to Lambda or Netlify
Zipkin
- Less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- Fewer features: sampling, storage options and UI are all more limited
- The interface is dated and slower to work with on large trace volumes
- Tracing alone still leaves metrics and logs in separate tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
Deno Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 1M requests/month
- 100GB outbound bandwidth
- 50ms CPU time per request
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited requests
- 5GB KV storage
- Priority support
Zipkin
Free- ZipkinFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Deno Deploy if
- You need edge functions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud/Web.
- You also want deno kv.
Choose Zipkin if
- You need trace collection and search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want dependency diagram.
Questions people ask
- Is Deno Deploy or Zipkin better?
- Neither clearly leads. Deno Deploy starts at Free and Zipkin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Deno Deploy or Zipkin?
- Deno Deploy starts at Free and Zipkin at Free.
- Does Deno Deploy or Zipkin run on more platforms?
- Deno Deploy runs on Cloud/Web. Zipkin runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Deno Deploy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Deno Deploy best used for?
- Deno Deploy is most often used for api endpoints, edge functions, static sites, real-time apps. Of those, api endpoints and edge functions are not what Zipkin is typically brought in for.
- What can Deno Deploy do that Zipkin cannot?
- Deno Deploy covers Edge Functions, Deno KV, Automatic HTTPS, Global Distribution. Zipkin covers Trace collection and search, Dependency diagram, Simple deployment, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Deno Deploy: What does Deno Deploy's free tier include?
Deno Deploy free tier includes 1 million requests per month, 100 GB of outbound bandwidth, 50 milliseconds of CPU time per request, 50 custom domains, 1 GiB of KV storage, and up to 5 team members.
SourceZipkin: Is Zipkin free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Deno Deploy: What are Deno Deploy's Pro plan features and pricing?
Deno Deploy Pro costs $20/month and removes request limits, increases KV storage to 5GB, and includes priority support. Additional storage beyond 5GB costs $0.75/GiB.
SourceZipkin: Zipkin or Jaeger?
Jaeger has more momentum, more features and CNCF backing. Zipkin is lighter and quicker to stand up, and remains well supported in the Java and Spring ecosystem.
Deno Deploy: What are the deployment size and memory limits for Deno Deploy?
The total size of all files within a deployment (source files and static files) should not exceed 1 gigabyte. Applications have a maximum memory allocation of 512MB.
SourceZipkin: Does Zipkin work with OpenTelemetry?
Yes. OpenTelemetry can export to Zipkin, which is now the usual way to instrument for it.
Deno Deploy: Does Deno Deploy support TypeScript natively?
Yes. Deno Deploy runs TypeScript natively with zero-configuration TypeScript support. Code can be written in TypeScript or JavaScript and runs on the same V8 engine.
SourceDeno Deploy: What security features does Deno Deploy provide?
Deno Deploy features an opt-in permission system to mitigate supply chain attacks. Permissions can be explicitly granted for file, network, and environment access, running code securely by default.
SourceRelated pages
More on Deno Deploy
Other head to heads
- Deno Deploy vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Deno Deploy vs Upstash
- Deno Deploy vs Cerebrium
- Deno Deploy vs Beam Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Serverless Framework
- Deno Deploy vs Koyeb
- Deno Deploy vs Neon
- Deno Deploy vs Pulumi
- Deno Deploy vs Render
- Deno Deploy vs Fly.io
- Deno Deploy vs Fireworks AI
- Deno Deploy vs Fastly
- Deno Deploy vs Oracle Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs Orca Security
- Deno Deploy vs Packer
- Deno Deploy vs Porter
- Deno Deploy vs Rook
- Deno Deploy vs Jaeger
- Deno Deploy vs Grafana Cloud
- Deno Deploy vs VictoriaMetrics
- Deno Deploy vs Anyscale
- Deno Deploy vs Go
- Deno Deploy vs Heroku
- Deno Deploy vs Vault
- Deno Deploy vs Caddy
- Deno Deploy vs DeepInfra
- Deno Deploy vs OpenTelemetry
- Deno Deploy vs Thanos
- Deno Deploy vs Linkerd
- Deno Deploy vs Longhorn
- Zipkin vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Zipkin vs Upstash
- Zipkin vs Cerebrium
- Zipkin vs Beam Cloud
- Zipkin vs Serverless Framework
- Zipkin vs Koyeb
- Zipkin vs Neon
- Zipkin vs Pulumi
- Zipkin vs Render
- Zipkin vs Fly.io
- Zipkin vs Fireworks AI
- Zipkin vs Fastly
- Zipkin vs Oracle Cloud
- Zipkin vs Orca Security
- Zipkin vs Packer
- Zipkin vs Porter
- Zipkin vs Rook
- Zipkin vs Jaeger
- Zipkin vs Grafana Cloud
- Zipkin vs VictoriaMetrics
- Zipkin vs Anyscale
- Zipkin vs Go
- Zipkin vs Heroku
- Zipkin vs Vault
- Zipkin vs Caddy
- Zipkin vs DeepInfra
- Zipkin vs OpenTelemetry
- Zipkin vs Thanos
- Zipkin vs Linkerd
- Zipkin vs Longhorn


