Cloud · head to head
DeepInfra vs Zipkin

DeepInfra
Cloud
Low-cost cloud API for running open-source AI models
- From
- $0.08/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Zipkin has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DeepInfra focuses on inference hosting rather than fine-tuning or full training pipelines that competitors like Fireworks AI offer.; Zipkin less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- They diverge on capability: DeepInfra covers Open model hosting, Zipkin covers Trace collection and search.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DeepInfra and Zipkin actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DeepInfra
- Open model hosting
- Pay-per-token pricing
- Long context support
- DeepCluster
- Zero retention policy
- Real-time metrics
Only in Zipkin
- Trace collection and search
- Dependency diagram
- Simple deployment
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DeepInfra
- Running open-source LLM inference without managing GPUsnot Zipkin
- Serving speech and image generation models via APInot Zipkin
- Cost-sensitive production inference at scalenot Zipkin
- Reserved GPU capacity via DeepCluster for steady workloadsnot Zipkin
Zipkin
- Adding distributed tracing quickly without standing up heavy infrastructurenot DeepInfra
- Java and Spring Boot estates, where instrumentation support is long-establishednot DeepInfra
- Small deployments where Jaeger is more than the problem requiresnot DeepInfra
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DeepInfra
- Focuses on inference hosting rather than fine-tuning or full training pipelines that competitors like Fireworks AI offer.
- Model selection is limited to what DeepInfra chooses to host, unlike self-managed platforms.
- No published free tier; usage is billed from the first token.
Zipkin
- Less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- Fewer features: sampling, storage options and UI are all more limited
- The interface is dated and slower to work with on large trace volumes
- Tracing alone still leaves metrics and logs in separate tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
DeepInfra
$0.08/month- Pay-as-you-go$undefined/mo
- Per-model token pricing from $0.08 to $2.85 per million input tokens
- No long-term contract
- DeepCluster$1.98/month
- Dedicated NVIDIA B300 GPU clusters at $1.98/GPU-hour
Zipkin
Free- ZipkinFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose DeepInfra if
- You need open model hosting.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want pay-per-token pricing.
Choose Zipkin if
- You need trace collection and search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want dependency diagram.
Questions people ask
- Is DeepInfra or Zipkin better?
- Neither clearly leads. DeepInfra starts at $0.08/month and Zipkin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DeepInfra or Zipkin?
- Zipkin has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $0.08/month for DeepInfra and Free for Zipkin.
- Does DeepInfra or Zipkin run on more platforms?
- DeepInfra runs on web, api. Zipkin runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Zipkin for free?
- Yes. Zipkin has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. DeepInfra starts at $0.08/month.
- What is DeepInfra best used for?
- DeepInfra is most often used for running open-source llm inference without managing gpus, serving speech and image generation models via api, cost-sensitive production inference at scale, reserved gpu capacity via deepcluster for steady workloads. Of those, running open-source llm inference without managing gpus and serving speech and image generation models via api are not what Zipkin is typically brought in for.
- What can DeepInfra do that Zipkin cannot?
- DeepInfra covers Open model hosting, Pay-per-token pricing, Long context support, DeepCluster. Zipkin covers Trace collection and search, Dependency diagram, Simple deployment, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DeepInfra: Is there a free tier on DeepInfra?
No free tier is published; usage is billed pay-as-you-go from the first token, though a credit card or pre-payment is required before you can send requests.
SourceZipkin: Is Zipkin free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
DeepInfra: How is usage priced?
Language models are billed per million input/output tokens, other models by inference execution time, and audio models per minute of audio processed, with no minimum commitment.
SourceZipkin: Zipkin or Jaeger?
Jaeger has more momentum, more features and CNCF backing. Zipkin is lighter and quicker to stand up, and remains well supported in the Java and Spring ecosystem.
DeepInfra: What are the Standard, Priority, and Flex tiers?
Standard is default best-effort pricing at 1x, Priority costs 1.5x for faster time-to-first-token during peak demand, and Flex costs 0.8x for non-production or asynchronous workloads.
SourceZipkin: Does Zipkin work with OpenTelemetry?
Yes. OpenTelemetry can export to Zipkin, which is now the usual way to instrument for it.
DeepInfra: How does billing scale with spend?
Accounts advance through usage tiers as cumulative payments cross $20, $100, $500, $2,000, and $10,000 thresholds, with invoices generated monthly or at each threshold.
SourceDeepInfra: Is there a limit on concurrent requests?
Yes, accounts are limited to 200 concurrent requests by default, though spending limits can also be configured to prevent unexpected charges.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DeepInfra vs Grafana Cloud
- DeepInfra vs Neon
- DeepInfra vs DigitalOcean
- DeepInfra vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- DeepInfra vs Pulumi
- DeepInfra vs Fly.io
- DeepInfra vs Anyscale
- DeepInfra vs Fireworks AI
- DeepInfra vs Podman
- DeepInfra vs Railway
- DeepInfra vs Render
- DeepInfra vs Vault
- DeepInfra vs Wiz
- DeepInfra vs Beam Cloud
- DeepInfra vs Cerebrium
- DeepInfra vs Go
- DeepInfra vs Azure Functions
- DeepInfra vs Caddy
- Zipkin vs Grafana Cloud
- Zipkin vs Neon
- Zipkin vs DigitalOcean
- Zipkin vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zipkin vs Pulumi
- Zipkin vs Fly.io
- Zipkin vs Anyscale
- Zipkin vs Fireworks AI
- Zipkin vs Podman
- Zipkin vs Railway
- Zipkin vs Render
- Zipkin vs Vault
- Zipkin vs Wiz
- Zipkin vs Beam Cloud
- Zipkin vs Cerebrium
- Zipkin vs Go
- Zipkin vs Azure Functions
- Zipkin vs Caddy

