Cloud · head to head
Jaeger vs New Relic
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Jaeger tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps; New Relic data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- They diverge on capability: Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, New Relic covers APM.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jaeger and New Relic actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jaeger
- Distributed trace search
- Dependency graph
- Adaptive sampling
- Pluggable storage
Only in New Relic
- APM
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Log Management
- Browser Monitoring
- Synthetic Monitoring
- Mobile Monitoring
- Kubernetes Monitoring
- AI Ops
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jaeger
- Finding which service in a request path causes the latencynot New Relic
- Understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wikinot New Relic
- Debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patternsnot New Relic
New Relic
- Application monitoringnot Jaeger
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Jaeger
- Error trackingnot Jaeger
- Performance optimizationnot Jaeger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jaeger
- Tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- Storage is the real operational cost: high-volume tracing on Elasticsearch or Cassandra is a cluster to run and pay for
- Traces alone, without correlated metrics and logs, leave you switching between tools during an incident
New Relic
- Data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- Core user licensing model adds complexity to pricing with distinction between full platform users and basic users
- Default logs obfuscation may miss some sensitive patterns requiring custom configuration
- Retention limits even on paid tiers require additional storage for long-term compliance requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Jaeger
Free- JaegerFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
New Relic
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the New Relic review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Jaeger if
- You need distributed trace search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want dependency graph.
Choose New Relic if
- You need apm.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
- You also want infrastructure monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Jaeger or New Relic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jaeger starts at Free and New Relic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jaeger or New Relic?
- Jaeger starts at Free and New Relic at Free.
- Does Jaeger or New Relic run on more platforms?
- Jaeger runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker. New Relic runs on Web, Api, Mobile.
- Can I use Jaeger for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Jaeger best used for?
- Jaeger is most often used for finding which service in a request path causes the latency, understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wiki, debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patterns. Of those, finding which service in a request path causes the latency and understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wiki are not what New Relic is typically brought in for.
- What can Jaeger do that New Relic cannot?
- Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, Dependency graph, Adaptive sampling, Pluggable storage. New Relic covers APM, Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Browser Monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jaeger: Is Jaeger free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Costs are the storage backend you run.
New Relic: Does New Relic offer a free tier?
Yes, New Relic's free tier is perpetual with no credit card required. It includes 100 GB of free data ingest monthly, one Full Platform User with access to all 50+ capabilities, and unlimited Basic Users for querying and dashboard creation.
SourceJaeger: Do I use Jaeger or OpenTelemetry?
Both, usually. Instrument with OpenTelemetry and use Jaeger to store and query the traces.
New Relic: How much does New Relic cost for paid plans?
Paid plans start at $49 per month per core user. New Relic uses consumption-based pricing where you pay only for what you use. Annual commitment options are available with volume discounts for larger teams.
SourceJaeger: Does Jaeger handle metrics and logs?
No. It is a tracing system. Metrics and logs need Prometheus, Loki or an equivalent.
New Relic: What data retention is included in New Relic's free tier?
The free tier includes a minimum of 8 days data retention for troubleshooting. Paid plans offer extended retention periods and customizable data retention policies.
SourceNew Relic: How many integrations does New Relic support?
New Relic provides access to 780+ integrations and unlimited hosts at no additional cost. These include monitoring integrations for various cloud services, databases, and applications.
SourceNew Relic: Can I use New Relic to monitor multiple cloud providers?
Yes, New Relic is cloud-agnostic and supports monitoring across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and on-premises infrastructure in a single platform.
SourceNew Relic: What is New Relic's ownership structure today?
New Relic was acquired by TPG and Francisco Partners on July 31, 2023, for $6.5 billion and transitioned from a publicly traded company to a private company in November 2023.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Jaeger vs Zipkin
- Jaeger vs Grafana Cloud
- Jaeger vs VictoriaMetrics
- Jaeger vs Fastly
- Jaeger vs HAProxy
- Jaeger vs Anyscale
- Jaeger vs Proxmox VE
- Jaeger vs Rancher
- Jaeger vs OpenEBS
- Jaeger vs DeepInfra
- Jaeger vs Go
- Jaeger vs Packer
- Jaeger vs Caddy
- Jaeger vs Cerebrium
- Jaeger vs K3s
- Jaeger vs CloudWatch
- Jaeger vs Elastic APM
- Jaeger vs Fluent Bit
- Jaeger vs Loggly
- Jaeger vs Datadog Logs
- Jaeger vs Coralogix
- Jaeger vs Grafana Loki
- Jaeger vs Dynatrace
- Jaeger vs Airbrake
- Jaeger vs AppDynamics
- Jaeger vs Better Stack
- Jaeger vs Bugsnag
- Jaeger vs Elastic Stack
- Jaeger vs Fluentd
- Jaeger vs Dynatrace Logs
- Jaeger vs Elastic
- Jaeger vs Elasticsearch Service
- New Relic vs Zipkin
- New Relic vs Grafana Cloud
- New Relic vs VictoriaMetrics
- New Relic vs Fastly
- New Relic vs HAProxy
- New Relic vs Anyscale
- New Relic vs Proxmox VE
- New Relic vs Rancher
- New Relic vs OpenEBS
- New Relic vs DeepInfra
- New Relic vs Go
- New Relic vs Packer
- New Relic vs Caddy
- New Relic vs Cerebrium
- New Relic vs K3s
- New Relic vs CloudWatch
- New Relic vs Elastic APM
- New Relic vs Fluent Bit
- New Relic vs Loggly
- New Relic vs Datadog Logs
- New Relic vs Coralogix
- New Relic vs Grafana Loki
- New Relic vs Dynatrace
- New Relic vs Airbrake
- New Relic vs AppDynamics
- New Relic vs Better Stack
- New Relic vs Bugsnag
- New Relic vs Elastic Stack
- New Relic vs Fluentd
- New Relic vs Dynatrace Logs
- New Relic vs Elastic
- New Relic vs Elasticsearch Service


