Software · head to head
Fluentd vs New Relic
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fluentd fluentd needs more than 60 MB of memory at runtime, against roughly 450 KB for Fluent Bit; New Relic data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- They diverge on capability: Fluentd covers Log collection, New Relic covers APM.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fluentd and New Relic actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fluentd
- Log collection
- Data parsing
- Filtering and buffering
- Event routing
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in New Relic
- APM
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Log Management
- Browser Monitoring
- Synthetic Monitoring
- Mobile Monitoring
- Kubernetes Monitoring
- AI Ops
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fluentd
- Unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinationsnot New Relic
- Parsing and transforming log records before forwardingnot New Relic
- Aggregating logs from containers into Elasticsearch, S3 or a SIEMnot New Relic
New Relic
- Application monitoringnot Fluentd
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Fluentd
- Error trackingnot Fluentd
- Performance optimizationnot Fluentd
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fluentd
- Fluentd needs more than 60 MB of memory at runtime, against roughly 450 KB for Fluent Bit
- Fluentd is built as a Ruby gem and depends on other gems, so a Ruby runtime is required
- Its capability comes from over 1,000 external plugins rather than built in functionality, so each added input or output is a separate dependency
- The Fluent Bit documentation states that cloud providers have switched from Fluentd to Fluent Bit for performance and compatibility and calls Fluent Bit the next generation solution
New Relic
- Data ingest costs can be high for large-scale deployments with high logging volume, making budgeting difficult
- Core user licensing model adds complexity to pricing with distinction between full platform users and basic users
- Default logs obfuscation may miss some sensitive patterns requiring custom configuration
- Retention limits even on paid tiers require additional storage for long-term compliance requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Fluentd
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Data parsing
- Filtering and buffering
New Relic
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the New Relic review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fluentd if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want data parsing.
Choose New Relic if
- You need apm.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
- You also want infrastructure monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Fluentd or New Relic better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fluentd starts at Free and New Relic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fluentd or New Relic?
- Fluentd starts at Free and New Relic at Free.
- Does Fluentd or New Relic run on more platforms?
- Fluentd runs on Web, Api. New Relic runs on Web, Api, Mobile.
- Can I use Fluentd for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Fluentd best used for?
- Fluentd is most often used for unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinations, parsing and transforming log records before forwarding, aggregating logs from containers into elasticsearch, s3 or a siem. Of those, unified log collection and routing from many sources to many destinations and parsing and transforming log records before forwarding are not what New Relic is typically brought in for.
- What can Fluentd do that New Relic cannot?
- Fluentd covers Log collection, Data parsing, Filtering and buffering, Event routing. New Relic covers APM, Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Browser Monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
New Relic: Does New Relic offer a free tier?
Yes, New Relic's free tier is perpetual with no credit card required. It includes 100 GB of free data ingest monthly, one Full Platform User with access to all 50+ capabilities, and unlimited Basic Users for querying and dashboard creation.
SourceNew Relic: How much does New Relic cost for paid plans?
Paid plans start at $49 per month per core user. New Relic uses consumption-based pricing where you pay only for what you use. Annual commitment options are available with volume discounts for larger teams.
SourceNew Relic: What data retention is included in New Relic's free tier?
The free tier includes a minimum of 8 days data retention for troubleshooting. Paid plans offer extended retention periods and customizable data retention policies.
SourceNew Relic: How many integrations does New Relic support?
New Relic provides access to 780+ integrations and unlimited hosts at no additional cost. These include monitoring integrations for various cloud services, databases, and applications.
SourceNew Relic: Can I use New Relic to monitor multiple cloud providers?
Yes, New Relic is cloud-agnostic and supports monitoring across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, and on-premises infrastructure in a single platform.
SourceNew Relic: What is New Relic's ownership structure today?
New Relic was acquired by TPG and Francisco Partners on July 31, 2023, for $6.5 billion and transitioned from a publicly traded company to a private company in November 2023.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fluentd vs Elastic Stack
- Fluentd vs Datadog Logs
- Fluentd vs Coralogix
- Fluentd vs Grafana Loki
- Fluentd vs CloudWatch
- Fluentd vs Dynatrace
- Fluentd vs InfluxDB
- Fluentd vs Airbrake
- Fluentd vs AppDynamics
- Fluentd vs Axiom
- Fluentd vs Azure Monitor
- Fluentd vs Better Stack
- Fluentd vs Bugsnag
- Fluentd vs Dynatrace Logs
- Fluentd vs Elastic
- Fluentd vs Elastic APM
- Fluentd vs Elasticsearch Service
- Fluentd vs ELK Stack
- New Relic vs Elastic Stack
- New Relic vs Datadog Logs
- New Relic vs Coralogix
- New Relic vs Grafana Loki
- New Relic vs CloudWatch
- New Relic vs Dynatrace
- New Relic vs InfluxDB
- New Relic vs Airbrake
- New Relic vs AppDynamics
- New Relic vs Axiom
- New Relic vs Azure Monitor
- New Relic vs Better Stack
- New Relic vs Bugsnag
- New Relic vs Dynatrace Logs
- New Relic vs Elastic
- New Relic vs Elastic APM
- New Relic vs Elasticsearch Service
- New Relic vs ELK Stack


