Maritime · head to head
NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Wartsila Voyage

NAPA Fleet Intelligence
Maritime
Vessel performance, emissions compliance and voyage optimisation built on NAPA hydrodynamic ship models
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Wartsila Voyage
Maritime
Smart maritime ecosystem solutions
- From
- $15000/one-time
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: NAPA Fleet Intelligence model-derived performance from AIS and noon reports is an estimate, so it supports fleet screening and dispute evidence better than fine-grained optimisation of a single ship.; Wartsila Voyage limited publicly available pricing information requires direct contact with sales team
- They diverge on capability: NAPA Fleet Intelligence covers NAPA Performance Model, Wartsila Voyage covers ECDIS navigation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which NAPA Fleet Intelligence and Wartsila Voyage actually diverge.
| Attribute | NAPA Fleet Intelligence | Wartsila Voyage |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $15000/one-time |
| Pricing model | quote | one-time |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | Bridge Systems, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 1834 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maritime).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- NAPA Performance Model
- AIS-based analysis
- Voyage optimisation
- Emissions reporting
- Hull and propeller performance
- Fleet benchmarking
- Onboard integration
- Passenger ship modules
Only in Wartsila Voyage
- ECDIS navigation
- Voyage planning
- Fleet performance
- Port optimization
- Bridge systems
- Fleet management
- Port systems
- Embedded support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- A charterer assessing hull performance of vessels it does not own using AIS data alonenot Wartsila Voyage
- An owner needing auditable CII and EU ETS numbers rather than spreadsheet estimatesnot Wartsila Voyage
- A technical manager deciding whether hull cleaning this quarter pays for itself in fuelnot Wartsila Voyage
- A fleet arguing a charter party speed and consumption claim and needing model-backed evidencenot Wartsila Voyage
Wartsila Voyage
- Optimizing fuel consumption through voyage route planningnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Retrofitting existing ships for emissions compliancenot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Training crews on methanol and ammonia enginesnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Tracking carbon footprint across shipping fleetnot NAPA Fleet Intelligence
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
- Model-derived performance from AIS and noon reports is an estimate, so it supports fleet screening and dispute evidence better than fine-grained optimisation of a single ship.
- Pricing is per vessel and unpublished, and modular scoping means the quote you compare against a competitor may not cover the same functions.
- Building the vessel-specific performance model requires hull form and design data that owners of older or second-hand tonnage often do not have, which turns onboarding into a data hunt.
- It is a monitoring and advisory layer, not a system of record; you still run a separate planned maintenance system, a chartering system and a crewing system.
- NAPA is strongest in the design and stability world, and its operational reference base, while real, is smaller than the pure voyage-optimisation specialists, so integration breadth with commercial shipping software is narrower.
Wartsila Voyage
- Limited publicly available pricing information requires direct contact with sales team
- Requires specialized training for bridge crews to operate effectively in different vessel scenarios
Pricing, plan by plan
NAPA Fleet Intelligence
On request- NAPA Fleet Intelligence$undefined/year
- Licensed per vessel with modular scope
- Fleet agreements and multi-year terms negotiated
- Vessel model creation may be a one-off setup charge
Wartsila Voyage
$15000/one-time- ECDIS Suite$30000/one-time
- ECDIS
- Voyage planning
- Weather routing
Which should you pick?
Choose NAPA Fleet Intelligence if
- You need napa performance model.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want ais-based analysis.
Choose Wartsila Voyage if
- You need ecdis navigation.
- You work on Bridge Systems, Web.
- You also want voyage planning.
Questions people ask
- Is NAPA Fleet Intelligence or Wartsila Voyage better?
- Neither clearly leads. NAPA Fleet Intelligence starts at On request and Wartsila Voyage at $15000/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, NAPA Fleet Intelligence or Wartsila Voyage?
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence starts at On request and Wartsila Voyage at $15000/one-time.
- Does NAPA Fleet Intelligence or Wartsila Voyage run on more platforms?
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence runs on Web, Cloud. Wartsila Voyage runs on Bridge Systems, Web.
- What is NAPA Fleet Intelligence best used for?
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence is most often used for a charterer assessing hull performance of vessels it does not own using ais data alone, an owner needing auditable cii and eu ets numbers rather than spreadsheet estimates, a technical manager deciding whether hull cleaning this quarter pays for itself in fuel, a fleet arguing a charter party speed and consumption claim and needing model-backed evidence. Of those, a charterer assessing hull performance of vessels it does not own using ais data alone and an owner needing auditable cii and eu ets numbers rather than spreadsheet estimates are not what Wartsila Voyage is typically brought in for.
- What can NAPA Fleet Intelligence do that Wartsila Voyage cannot?
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence covers NAPA Performance Model, AIS-based analysis, Voyage optimisation, Emissions reporting. Wartsila Voyage covers ECDIS navigation, Voyage planning, Fleet performance, Port optimization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NAPA Fleet Intelligence: Do we need onboard sensors?
No. NAPA can produce performance analysis from AIS and noon reports using its hydrodynamic model, though instrumented data improves accuracy.
Wartsila Voyage: What is Navi-Sailor ECDIS?
Navi-Sailor ECDIS is an IMO-compliant electronic chart display system integrating GPS, radar, and AIS data for route planning and monitoring. It is one of the most installed ECDIS solutions worldwide.
SourceNAPA Fleet Intelligence: Does it handle EU ETS and CII?
Yes, emissions calculation and regulatory reporting for EU MRV, IMO DCS, CII and EU ETS are covered.
Wartsila Voyage: Does Wärtsilä offer fleet management integration?
Yes. Navi-Sailor ECDIS integrates with Wärtsilä Fleet Optimisation Solution to connect ship and shore, providing fleet teams better visibility and bridge teams streamlined workflows.
SourceNAPA Fleet Intelligence: Is it the same NAPA used for ship design?
Yes, same company, and Fleet Intelligence reuses the hydrodynamic modelling from that business.
Wartsila Voyage: Is Wärtsilä Voyage compliant with maritime regulations?
Yes. Navi-Sailor ECDIS is fully IMO-compliant and designed to satisfy SOLAS Chapter V requirements. It supports S-100 standards for future maritime data interoperability.
SourceNAPA Fleet Intelligence: Is pricing published?
No. It is licensed per vessel by module, quoted per fleet.
Related pages
More on NAPA Fleet Intelligence
More on Wartsila Voyage
Other head to heads
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs DNV Navigator Port
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Veson Nautical
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kpler
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Bearing AI
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ZeroNorth
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Helm Operations
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Danaos
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs SpeedyDock
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs FleetMon
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Nautilus Labs
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kaleris
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Linerlytica
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs MDS Transmodal
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ORBCOMM
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Kongsberg Maritime
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ChartCo
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Shone
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Orca AI
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs ShipNet
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs NAVTOR
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Voyager Worldwide
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs DNV Maritime
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs MarineTraffic
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs NAPA
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs Sofar Ocean
- NAPA Fleet Intelligence vs S&P Global Maritime
- Wartsila Voyage vs DNV Navigator Port
- Wartsila Voyage vs Veson Nautical
- Wartsila Voyage vs Kpler
- Wartsila Voyage vs Bearing AI
- Wartsila Voyage vs ZeroNorth
- Wartsila Voyage vs Wartsila Fleet Operations Solution
- Wartsila Voyage vs Kongsberg Vessel Insight
- Wartsila Voyage vs Helm Operations
- Wartsila Voyage vs Danaos
- Wartsila Voyage vs SpeedyDock
- Wartsila Voyage vs FleetMon
- Wartsila Voyage vs Nautilus Labs
- Wartsila Voyage vs Kaleris
- Wartsila Voyage vs Linerlytica
- Wartsila Voyage vs MDS Transmodal
- Wartsila Voyage vs ORBCOMM
- Wartsila Voyage vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Wartsila Voyage vs ChartCo
- Wartsila Voyage vs Shone
- Wartsila Voyage vs Orca AI
- Wartsila Voyage vs ShipNet
- Wartsila Voyage vs NAVTOR
- Wartsila Voyage vs Voyager Worldwide
- Wartsila Voyage vs DNV Maritime
- Wartsila Voyage vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- Wartsila Voyage vs MarineTraffic
- Wartsila Voyage vs NAPA
- Wartsila Voyage vs Sofar Ocean
- Wartsila Voyage vs S&P Global Maritime
