Softwr

Software · head to head

Mo vs Workvivo

M

Mo

Software

Employee recognition and culture platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Workvivo logo

Workvivo

Software

Employee experience platform for connected workplaces

From
$4/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Mo the pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no minimum; it states quotes are based on your goals and company size; Workvivo the pricing page publishes no price, no minimum and no per-licence rate; the vendor states cost depends on licence count and organisation needs and requires a custom quote
  • They diverge on capability: Mo covers Social recognition, Workvivo covers Social activity feed.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Mo and Workvivo actually diverge.

Attributes where Mo and Workvivo differ
AttributeMoWorkvivo
Starting priceOn request$4/month
Founded20192017

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Mo

  • Social recognition
  • Recognition feeds
  • Analytics dashboard
  • Manager tools
  • Customizable workflow
  • Reporting
  • Google Workspace

Only in Workvivo

  • Social activity feed
  • Employee recognition
  • Internal communications
  • Podcasts and video
  • Surveys
  • Analytics
  • Zoom
  • Workday

Both cover

  • Mobile app
  • Integrations
  • Slack
  • Microsoft Teams

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Mo

  • Peer recognition and appreciation on a shared social feednot Workvivo
  • Running annual awards and nomination programsnot Workvivo
  • Recognition delivered inside Microsoft Teams and Slack for distributed teamsnot Workvivo

Workvivo

  • Company-wide internal communications and news for desk and frontline staffnot Mo
  • Employee recognition, badges and awards inside a social activity feednot Mo
  • Livestreamed all-hands broadcasts with multi-language auto-translationnot Mo

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Mo

  • The pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no minimum; it states quotes are based on your goals and company size
  • The only route to a figure is a quote request or a 30-minute call with the vendor's team
  • There is no free tier, trial price or self-serve signup published

Workvivo

  • The pricing page publishes no price, no minimum and no per-licence rate; the vendor states cost depends on licence count and organisation needs and requires a custom quote
  • There is no free trial; the vendor offers only a demo
  • Real-time chat with voice and video is a paid add-on rather than part of the core platform
  • Agentic search across connected systems is sold separately as the HQ Agent add-on tier
  • Employee listening and engagement surveys sit in the separate Seer product, added on or bought standalone
  • Digital signage through Workvivo TV is another paid add-on
  • Plan and add-on changes go through a Workvivo CX Manager rather than self-serve

Pricing, plan by plan

Mo

On request
  • Mo Platform$undefined/month
    • Recognition
    • Culture tools
    • Analytics

Workvivo

$4/month
  • Business$4/month
    • Social feed
    • Recognition
    • Mobile app
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Advanced analytics
    • Custom integrations
    • Dedicated support

Which should you pick?

Choose Mo if

  • You need social recognition.
  • You also want recognition feeds.
Mo review

Choose Workvivo if

  • You need social activity feed.
  • You also want employee recognition.
Workvivo review

Questions people ask

Is Mo or Workvivo better?
Neither clearly leads. Mo starts at On request and Workvivo at $4/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Mo or Workvivo?
Mo starts at On request and Workvivo at $4/month.
Does Mo or Workvivo run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Mo best used for?
Mo is most often used for peer recognition and appreciation on a shared social feed, running annual awards and nomination programs, recognition delivered inside microsoft teams and slack for distributed teams. Of those, peer recognition and appreciation on a shared social feed and running annual awards and nomination programs are not what Workvivo is typically brought in for.
What can Mo do that Workvivo cannot?
Mo covers Social recognition, Recognition feeds, Analytics dashboard, Manager tools. Workvivo covers Social activity feed, Employee recognition, Internal communications, Podcasts and video. Both handle Mobile app, Integrations, Slack, Microsoft Teams.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Mo

More on Workvivo

Keep looking

Other head to heads