Logging · head to head
ELK Stack vs Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ELK Stack the free Basic self managed subscription excludes machine learning, alerting, single sign on via SAML or OpenID Connect, LDAP and Active Directory authentication, field and document level security, searchable snapshots and cross cluster replication; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: ELK Stack covers Full-text search, Loki covers Label-based indexing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ELK Stack and Loki actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ELK Stack
- Full-text search
- Data visualization
- Time-series analytics
Only in Loki
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Both cover
- Log aggregation
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ELK Stack
- Centralised log search and analytics over Elasticsearchnot Loki
- Dashboards and visualisation of machine data in Kibananot Loki
- Self managing a search and observability cluster on your own hardwarenot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot ELK Stack
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot ELK Stack
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ELK Stack
- The free Basic self managed subscription excludes machine learning, alerting, single sign on via SAML or OpenID Connect, LDAP and Active Directory authentication, field and document level security, searchable snapshots and cross cluster replication
- Cross cluster operations require the same subscription tier on every cluster involved
- The 99.95 percent monthly uptime SLA applies only to the Platinum and Enterprise subscription tiers
- Three deployment models are priced on three different bases: resource based for Cloud Hosted, usage based for Serverless and licence based on nodes and RAM for self managed
- Elastic Cloud Serverless does not yet support traffic filtering, cross project search or bring your own key
- The pricing page publishes no rate for any tier
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
ELK Stack
Free- FreeFree
- Full-text search
- Data visualization
- Log aggregation
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose ELK Stack if
- You need full-text search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want data visualization.
Choose Loki if
- You need label-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real-time log streaming.
Questions people ask
- Is ELK Stack or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. ELK Stack starts at Free and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ELK Stack or Loki?
- ELK Stack starts at Free and Loki at Free.
- Does ELK Stack or Loki run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use ELK Stack for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ELK Stack best used for?
- ELK Stack is most often used for centralised log search and analytics over elasticsearch, dashboards and visualisation of machine data in kibana, self managing a search and observability cluster on your own hardware. Of those, centralised log search and analytics over elasticsearch and dashboards and visualisation of machine data in kibana are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can ELK Stack do that Loki cannot?
- ELK Stack covers Full-text search, Data visualization, Time-series analytics. Loki covers Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle Log aggregation, API, Webhooks, REST.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ELK Stack: Does Elastic offer a free trial without requiring a credit card?
Yes, Elastic offers a 14-day free cloud trial with no credit card required that includes all solutions: Search, Observability, Security, and Agent Builder.
SourceLoki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceELK Stack: Can I deploy Elastic locally for evaluation?
Yes, Elastic provides a local deployment option for Elasticsearch and Kibana with a one-command setup requiring no account or credit card. This allows self-managed evaluation.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceELK Stack: Does Elastic provide expert consultation for complex deployments?
Yes, Elastic offers expert consultation through their sales team for complex requirements and custom deployment scenarios.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ELK Stack vs Datadog Logs
- ELK Stack vs New Relic
- ELK Stack vs Coralogix
- ELK Stack vs Elastic
- ELK Stack vs Fluentd
- ELK Stack vs Splunk Enterprise
- ELK Stack vs InfluxDB
- ELK Stack vs Graylog
- ELK Stack vs Humio
- ELK Stack vs Logz.io
- ELK Stack vs Traceloop
- ELK Stack vs Loggly
- ELK Stack vs Mezmo
- ELK Stack vs New Relic Logs
- ELK Stack vs Telegraf
- ELK Stack vs Elastic Stack
- ELK Stack vs Dynatrace Logs
- ELK Stack vs Retrace
- ELK Stack vs Papertrail
- ELK Stack vs Raygun
- ELK Stack vs Elastic APM
- ELK Stack vs Filebeat
- ELK Stack vs Logstash
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic
- Loki vs Fluentd
- Loki vs Splunk Enterprise
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Humio
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Traceloop
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Telegraf
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash


