Softwr

Legal · head to head

Didomi vs Litify

Didomi logo

Didomi

Legal

Google-certified and IAB TCF consent management across web, mobile and connected TV

From
On request
Rated
-
Litify logo

Litify

Legal

Legal case and matter management built natively on Salesforce

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Didomi pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.; Litify pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.
  • They diverge on capability: Didomi covers Google CMP certification, Litify covers Native Salesforce application.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Didomi and Litify actually diverge.

Attributes where Didomi and Litify differ
AttributeDidomiLitify
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, Connected TV, APIWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Didomi

  • Google CMP certification
  • IAB TCF support
  • Connected TV and OTT
  • Mobile SDKs
  • Consent proof storage
  • Preference centre
  • Consent analytics
  • Global privacy regimes

Only in Litify

  • Native Salesforce application
  • Intake and referral management
  • Matter management
  • Reporting and dashboards
  • Mass tort handling

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Didomi

  • A European publisher whose Google Ad Manager revenue is withheld without a Google-certified CMP integrated with Consent Modenot Litify
  • A broadcaster collecting consent on connected TV apps, where certified CMP options are very limitednot Litify
  • A multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, iOS and Android propertiesnot Litify
  • A group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaintnot Litify

Litify

  • High volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimantsnot Didomi
  • Insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent filesnot Didomi
  • Corporate legal departments needing matter intake and outside counsel spend reportingnot Didomi
  • Multi-office practices needing referral tracking and consistent intake across locationsnot Didomi

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Didomi

  • Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.
  • Consent banners depress measurable traffic by design, and Didomi cannot prevent that, so publishers moving from a non-compliant banner should expect an immediate drop in tracked users and attributable conversions.
  • Certification is a moving target: Google and IAB update requirements periodically and each version change forces integration work on your side, not only on the vendor's.
  • Connected TV consent collection depends on the app platform and remote control interface, and implementations are considerably more involved than a web banner, often requiring per-platform development.
  • The wider privacy suite beyond consent is thinner than dedicated privacy platforms, so an organisation needing data subject rights automation and data mapping usually buys a second vendor anyway.

Litify

  • Pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.
  • The system being administered is Salesforce, so realising the configurability requires Salesforce administration skills most firms must hire or contract for.
  • Implementation is a configuration project measured in months, so it is not a system a firm can adopt quickly during a busy period.
  • That configurability means two Litify firms can run materially different systems, which makes external support and staff mobility harder.
  • There is no public documentation; the support site is behind a customer login, so buyers cannot assess the product depth before committing.

Pricing, plan by plan

Didomi

On request
  • Didomi CMP$undefined/year
    • Google-certified CMP for web, mobile and CTV
    • IAB TCF registered
    • Consent proof storage and analytics

Litify

On request
  • Litify$undefined/year
    • Quoted per customer with no published rates
    • Sold as a bundled subscription including the Salesforce platform entitlement
    • Implementation and configuration quoted separately

Which should you pick?

Choose Didomi if

  • You need google cmp certification.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API.
  • You also want iab tcf support.

Choose Litify if

  • You need native salesforce application.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want intake and referral management.

Questions people ask

Is Didomi or Litify better?
Neither clearly leads. Didomi starts at On request and Litify at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Didomi or Litify?
Didomi starts at On request and Litify at On request.
Does Didomi or Litify run on more platforms?
Didomi runs on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API. Litify runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Didomi best used for?
Didomi is most often used for a european publisher whose google ad manager revenue is withheld without a google-certified cmp integrated with consent mode, a broadcaster collecting consent on connected tv apps, where certified cmp options are very limited, a multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, ios and android properties, a group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaint. Of those, a european publisher whose google ad manager revenue is withheld without a google-certified cmp integrated with consent mode and a broadcaster collecting consent on connected tv apps, where certified cmp options are very limited are not what Litify is typically brought in for.
What can Didomi do that Litify cannot?
Didomi covers Google CMP certification, IAB TCF support, Connected TV and OTT, Mobile SDKs. Litify covers Native Salesforce application, Intake and referral management, Matter management, Reporting and dashboards.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Didomi: Is Didomi Google-certified?

Yes, for web, mobile and connected TV, and the certification has been renewed across multiple years.

Litify: Do we sign a separate contract with Salesforce?

Not according to Litify's published services agreement, which defines Litify as a reseller of the Salesforce services and defines the purchase as a combined offering of the platform plus the Litify application. You buy one subscription from Litify. Confirm how the platform appears on your own order form before signing.

Didomi: Does it support IAB TCF?

Yes, it is a registered TCF CMP, currently supporting version 2.2 and later revisions.

Litify: Is Litify for personal injury or corporate work?

Both, but differently. Plaintiff firms use it for high volume personal injury and mass tort, insurance defence firms for case volume, and corporate legal departments for matter intake and spend management rather than billing.

Didomi: What does it cost?

Not published. Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and quoted.

Litify: Is it suitable for a small firm?

No. It is sold to mid-market and enterprise operations and no entry tier is marketed. The implementation and administration requirements do not amortise at small headcounts.

Didomi: Where is consent data stored?

Didomi is a French company and offers European storage, which matters for procurement teams weighing supervisory jurisdiction.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads