Softwr

Legal · head to head

CASEpeer vs Didomi

CASEpeer logo

CASEpeer

Legal

Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms

From
$79/month
Rated
-
Didomi logo

Didomi

Legal

Google-certified and IAB TCF consent management across web, mobile and connected TV

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: CASEpeer it is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.; Didomi pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.
  • They diverge on capability: CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Didomi covers Google CMP certification.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which CASEpeer and Didomi actually diverge.

Attributes where CASEpeer and Didomi differ
AttributeCASEpeerDidomi
Starting price$79/monthOn request
Pricing modelPer user per monthquote
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in CASEpeer

  • Intake and case screening
  • Medical treatment tracking
  • Settlement and lien management
  • Negotiation tracking
  • Statute of limitations monitoring

Only in Didomi

  • Google CMP certification
  • IAB TCF support
  • Connected TV and OTT
  • Mobile SDKs
  • Consent proof storage
  • Preference centre
  • Consent analytics
  • Global privacy regimes

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

CASEpeer

  • Plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien trackingnot Didomi
  • Contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one placenot Didomi
  • Personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measurednot Didomi
  • Firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseloadnot Didomi

Didomi

  • A European publisher whose Google Ad Manager revenue is withheld without a Google-certified CMP integrated with Consent Modenot CASEpeer
  • A broadcaster collecting consent on connected TV apps, where certified CMP options are very limitednot CASEpeer
  • A multinational advertiser needing one consent signal honoured consistently across web, iOS and Android propertiesnot CASEpeer
  • A group that must produce consent evidence to a data protection authority following a complaintnot CASEpeer

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

CASEpeer

  • It is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.
  • There is no full double-entry general ledger, so the firm still needs separate accounting software and somebody to reconcile between the two.
  • The narrow personal injury focus means a practice that diversifies into family, employment or criminal work has to run a second system or migrate.
  • It has changed corporate hands three times since 2021, from independent to MyCase to AffiniPay, now trading as 8am, so roadmap continuity is a fair question to put to the vendor.
  • Sitting in the 8am group aligns it with LawPay and MyCase, so firms committed to a different payments provider get less from the integrations.

Didomi

  • Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and is not published, so a large publisher cannot estimate cost before entering a sales process, and traffic spikes translate directly into billing surprises.
  • Consent banners depress measurable traffic by design, and Didomi cannot prevent that, so publishers moving from a non-compliant banner should expect an immediate drop in tracked users and attributable conversions.
  • Certification is a moving target: Google and IAB update requirements periodically and each version change forces integration work on your side, not only on the vendor's.
  • Connected TV consent collection depends on the app platform and remote control interface, and implementations are considerably more involved than a web banner, often requiring per-platform development.
  • The wider privacy suite beyond consent is thinner than dedicated privacy platforms, so an organisation needing data subject rights automation and data mapping usually buys a second vendor anyway.

Pricing, plan by plan

CASEpeer

$79/month
  • Basic$79/month
    • Personal injury case management
    • Intake and treatment tracking
    • No minimum seat count
  • Pro$119/month
    • Adds reporting and automation
    • Lien and settlement tracking
    • No long-term contract required
  • Advanced$149/month
    • Full feature set
    • Advanced reporting
    • No long-term contract required

Didomi

On request
  • Didomi CMP$undefined/year
    • Google-certified CMP for web, mobile and CTV
    • IAB TCF registered
    • Consent proof storage and analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose CASEpeer if

  • You need intake and case screening.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want medical treatment tracking.

Choose Didomi if

  • You need google cmp certification.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API.
  • You also want iab tcf support.

Questions people ask

Is CASEpeer or Didomi better?
Neither clearly leads. CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Didomi at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, CASEpeer or Didomi?
CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Didomi at On request.
Does CASEpeer or Didomi run on more platforms?
CASEpeer runs on Web, iOS, Android. Didomi runs on Web, iOS, Android, Connected TV, API.
What is CASEpeer best used for?
CASEpeer is most often used for plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking, contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place, personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measured, firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseload. Of those, plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking and contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place are not what Didomi is typically brought in for.
What can CASEpeer do that Didomi cannot?
CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Medical treatment tracking, Settlement and lien management, Negotiation tracking. Didomi covers Google CMP certification, IAB TCF support, Connected TV and OTT, Mobile SDKs.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

CASEpeer: Is CASEpeer suitable for a corporate or defence firm?

No. It is built around contingency personal injury work: treatment, liens and settlement. A corporate firm billing hourly should look at Clio, Tabs3 or a large firm system instead.

Didomi: Is Didomi Google-certified?

Yes, for web, mobile and connected TV, and the certification has been renewed across multiple years.

CASEpeer: What does CASEpeer cost?

Published per-user rates are 79 USD for Basic, 119 USD for Pro and 149 USD for Advanced per month, with no minimum seat count and no long-term contract required.

Didomi: Does it support IAB TCF?

Yes, it is a registered TCF CMP, currently supporting version 2.2 and later revisions.

CASEpeer: Who owns CASEpeer?

It was acquired by MyCase in March 2021 and moved to AffiniPay in June 2022. AffiniPay rebranded to 8am in August 2025, so CASEpeer now sits alongside MyCase and LawPay in that group.

Didomi: What does it cost?

Not published. Pricing is based on monthly unique visitors and quoted.

Didomi: Where is consent data stored?

Didomi is a French company and offers European storage, which matters for procurement teams weighing supervisory jurisdiction.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads