Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Attention vs Lavender

Attention logo

Attention

Sales Enablement

Call recording that writes back to the CRM and scores reps against your own qualification framework

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Lavender logo

Lavender

Sales Enablement

Real-time email coaching that scores sales emails as you write them in your inbox

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Lavender has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Attention there is no published pricing and no self-serve tier, so even a small team must go through a sales cycle to get a number, which is a real disadvantage against Avoma and Fireflies where you can start on a card the same afternoon.; Lavender the free tier allows five emails a month, which is a demonstration rather than a usable plan, so anyone doing real outbound is on a paid seat within the first day.
  • They diverge on capability: Attention covers Call recording and transcription, Lavender covers Real-time email score.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Attention and Lavender actually diverge.

Attributes where Attention and Lavender differ
AttributeAttentionLavender
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquotePer user per month
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Chrome extension, Gmail, Outlook

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Attention

  • Call recording and transcription
  • CRM auto-update
  • AI coaching scorecards
  • Follow-up automation
  • Ask Attention Anything
  • Super Agent
  • Deal and pipeline reporting
  • Shareable clips

Only in Lavender

  • Real-time email score
  • Rewrite suggestions
  • Recipient personalisation
  • Mobile-preview check
  • Tone and reading level analysis
  • Team analytics
  • Coaching dashboard
  • Ora agent

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Attention

  • A sales organisation whose forecast is unreliable because representatives do not update MEDDIC fields after calls, and which wants those fields written automaticallynot Lavender
  • A sales manager who needs every call scored against the same qualification rubric rather than spot-checking a handful per rep per monthnot Lavender
  • A revenue operations lead consolidating call recording, coaching and CRM hygiene into one contract instead of three toolsnot Lavender
  • A team that wants call intelligence exposed to internal AI agents through MCP rather than trapped inside a vendor dashboardnot Lavender

Lavender

  • A sales enablement lead trying to raise reply rates across a 30-person team without rewriting every email themselvesnot Attention
  • A new sales development representative who needs feedback on cold email technique between manager one-to-onesnot Attention
  • A founder writing their own outbound who wants a check on length and reading level before sendingnot Attention
  • A manager wanting to see which reps write emails that correlate with replies rather than guessing from activity countsnot Attention

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Attention

  • There is no published pricing and no self-serve tier, so even a small team must go through a sales cycle to get a number, which is a real disadvantage against Avoma and Fireflies where you can start on a card the same afternoon.
  • Automatic CRM writeback is only as good as your field hygiene: if picklists, stage definitions and custom fields are inconsistent, the tool will confidently populate them wrongly and the errors are harder to spot than blank fields were.
  • The company was founded in 2021 and remains small against Gong and Chorus, so the library of benchmark data, published methodology and partner ecosystem that enterprises often buy alongside conversation intelligence is not comparable.
  • There is no standalone public documentation or help portal, which slows self-service troubleshooting and makes it harder for a technical evaluator to assess API depth before committing.
  • No native mobile application or browser extension has been confirmed, so field representatives who work primarily from a phone between meetings have a weaker experience than the desktop-first design assumes.

Lavender

  • The free tier allows five emails a month, which is a demonstration rather than a usable plan, so anyone doing real outbound is on a paid seat within the first day.
  • The scoring model is calibrated on cold business-to-business sales email; applied to customer success, recruiting or long-form relationship email it penalises length and formality that those contexts legitimately require.
  • It coaches the message and ignores the list, so representatives writing beautifully scored emails to badly chosen prospects still get no replies and conclude the tool does not work.
  • Team pricing at 99 US dollars per seat a month is well above what most sales tooling budgets allocate for a writing assistant, and the improvement is hard to attribute cleanly against everything else changing in a quarter.
  • The newer Ora agent is priced around 500 US dollars per agent per month, a completely different commercial bracket from the coach, and conflating the two makes budget conversations go wrong.

Pricing, plan by plan

Attention

On request
  • Attention$undefined/year
    • Call recording and transcription in 100+ languages
    • CRM auto-update for Salesforce and HubSpot
    • AI coaching scorecards

Lavender

Free
  • BasicFree
    • Analyse 5 emails per month
    • Personalise 5 emails per month
    • Email score and basic suggestions
  • Starter$29/month
    • Unlimited email analysis
    • Unlimited personalisation assistant
    • Rewrite suggestions
  • Individual Pro$49/month
    • Everything in Starter
    • Advanced personalisation
    • Deeper recipient research
  • Team$99/month
    • Everything in Individual Pro
    • Aggregated email analytics dashboard
    • Manager coaching views

Which should you pick?

Choose Attention if

  • You need call recording and transcription.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want crm auto-update.
Attention review

Choose Lavender if

  • You need real-time email score.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Chrome extension, Gmail, Outlook.
  • You also want rewrite suggestions.
Lavender review

Questions people ask

Is Attention or Lavender better?
Neither clearly leads. Attention starts at On request and Lavender at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Attention or Lavender?
Lavender has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Attention and Free for Lavender.
Does Attention or Lavender run on more platforms?
Attention runs on Web, API. Lavender runs on Web, Chrome extension, Gmail, Outlook.
Can I use Lavender for free?
Yes. Lavender has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Attention starts at On request.
What is Attention best used for?
Attention is most often used for a sales organisation whose forecast is unreliable because representatives do not update meddic fields after calls, and which wants those fields written automatically, a sales manager who needs every call scored against the same qualification rubric rather than spot-checking a handful per rep per month, a revenue operations lead consolidating call recording, coaching and crm hygiene into one contract instead of three tools, a team that wants call intelligence exposed to internal ai agents through mcp rather than trapped inside a vendor dashboard. Of those, a sales organisation whose forecast is unreliable because representatives do not update meddic fields after calls, and which wants those fields written automatically and a sales manager who needs every call scored against the same qualification rubric rather than spot-checking a handful per rep per month are not what Lavender is typically brought in for.
What can Attention do that Lavender cannot?
Attention covers Call recording and transcription, CRM auto-update, AI coaching scorecards, Follow-up automation. Lavender covers Real-time email score, Rewrite suggestions, Recipient personalisation, Mobile-preview check.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Attention: What does Attention actually automate that Gong does not?

Its headline capability is writing back to CRM fields from call content, including custom qualification fields, rather than primarily surfacing calls for later review.

Lavender: Does Lavender send emails?

The coach does not. It scores and rewrites inside your existing inbox or sequence tool. The separate Ora product does draft and send autonomously.

Attention: Is pricing published?

No. It is sales-quoted on annual contracts, with no self-serve tier, unlike Avoma or Fireflies.

Lavender: Is there a genuinely free version?

Yes, five analysed and five personalised emails per month, forever.

Attention: Is the company financially stable?

It raised a 30 million USD Series B in mid-2026 led by RTP Global, and reports four times year-on-year revenue growth, which is usually sufficient for enterprise vendor review.

Lavender: Does it work in Outlook?

Yes, alongside Gmail and the major sequence platforms.

Attention: Which CRMs does it write to?

Salesforce and HubSpot are the primary supported systems, with other CRMs addressed through its open API.

Lavender: Will it improve reply rates?

It reliably improves the mechanics that correlate with replies: length, reading level and personalisation. It cannot fix a bad target list.

Share

Related pages

More on Attention

More on Lavender

Keep looking

Other head to heads