Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Jobvite vs Metaview

Jobvite logo

Jobvite

Recruitment

Evolve your talent acquisition

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Metaview logo

Metaview

Recruitment

AI notetaking and sourcing agents for recruiters, priced per agent rather than per platform

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Metaview has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Jobvite no pricing is published and no minimum is stated; Metaview pricing is per user per agent, so a five-person team using notetaking, sourcing and application review multiplies quickly; the visible 100 USD figure is one agent for one recruiter, not a team subscription.
  • They diverge on capability: Jobvite covers Applicant Tracking, Metaview covers Structured interview notes.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Jobvite and Metaview actually diverge.

Attributes where Jobvite and Metaview differ
AttributeJobviteMetaview
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquotePer user per month, per agent
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, Ios, AndroidWeb, Chrome extension
Founded2006Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Jobvite

  • Applicant Tracking
  • CRM
  • Career Sites
  • Social Recruiting
  • Employee Referrals
  • Analytics
  • Onboarding
  • LinkedIn

Only in Metaview

  • Structured interview notes
  • ATS write-back
  • Sourcing agent
  • Application review agent
  • Intake call capture
  • Interviewer coaching
  • Assistant questions
  • Reports add-on

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Jobvite

  • Applicant tracking and recruitment workflow managementnot Metaview
  • Recruitment marketing and candidate onboardingnot Metaview

Metaview

  • A talent team where hiring managers complain that interview feedback quality varies wildly between interviewers and nobody writes notes within a day of the callnot Jobvite
  • An agency recruiter running back-to-back screens who needs a submittable candidate summary produced without an hour of typing afterwardsnot Jobvite
  • A hiring process under scrutiny for consistency, where every interview needs the same competency evidence recorded in the same shapenot Jobvite
  • A small in-house team using the sourcing agent to build a candidate list without paying for a separate sourcing platform seatnot Jobvite

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Jobvite

  • No pricing is published and no minimum is stated
  • The product is sold as a core applicant tracking system with onboarding, AI and recruitment marketing as separately added modules, so cost depends on a combination rather than a tier
  • Every route to a figure is a quote request

Metaview

  • Pricing is per user per agent, so a five-person team using notetaking, sourcing and application review multiplies quickly; the visible 100 USD figure is one agent for one recruiter, not a team subscription.
  • Recording candidates triggers consent and data protection duties that vary by jurisdiction, and in the EU and two-party consent US states you must obtain and evidence agreement before recording, which adds a step to every interview and gives candidates a reason to decline.
  • An AI-generated summary of a hiring conversation is a discoverable record; if the summary mischaracterises what a candidate said, that document can surface in a discrimination or unfair rejection claim.
  • Note quality depends on audio quality and on interviewers running structured interviews in the first place; a rambling unstructured conversation produces a rambling unstructured summary, so the tool amplifies existing process rather than fixing it.
  • The advertised prices cover the sourcing agent specifically; pricing for the notetaker, application review and the all-agents bundle is not shown on the same page, so a buyer cannot total the cost of the configuration they actually want without a sales conversation.

Pricing, plan by plan

Jobvite

On request
  • Jobvite$undefined/month
    • ATS
    • CRM
    • Career Sites

Metaview

Free
  • FreeFree
    • First 100 profiles sourced free
    • Unlimited concurrent searches
    • Full platform access
  • Pro$100/month
    • 200 profiles sourced per month
    • Unlimited concurrent searches
    • Assistant questions and note regenerations included
  • Max$300/month
    • Unlimited profiles sourced
    • Unlimited concurrent searches
    • Per user, per agent
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Custom volume and usage
    • Dedicated support and training
    • Enterprise security features

Which should you pick?

Choose Jobvite if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want crm.
Jobvite review

Choose Metaview if

  • You need structured interview notes.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Chrome extension.
  • You also want ats write-back.
Metaview review

Questions people ask

Is Jobvite or Metaview better?
Neither clearly leads. Jobvite starts at On request and Metaview at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Jobvite or Metaview?
Metaview has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Jobvite and Free for Metaview.
Does Jobvite or Metaview run on more platforms?
Jobvite runs on Web, Ios, Android. Metaview runs on Web, Chrome extension.
Can I use Metaview for free?
Yes. Metaview has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Jobvite starts at On request.
What is Jobvite best used for?
Jobvite is most often used for applicant tracking and recruitment workflow management, recruitment marketing and candidate onboarding. Of those, applicant tracking and recruitment workflow management and recruitment marketing and candidate onboarding are not what Metaview is typically brought in for.
What can Jobvite do that Metaview cannot?
Jobvite covers Applicant Tracking, CRM, Career Sites, Social Recruiting. Metaview covers Structured interview notes, ATS write-back, Sourcing agent, Application review agent.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Jobvite: How much does Jobvite cost?

Jobvite does not publish standard pricing. The platform uses a modular, flexible pricing model where customers start with core ATS functionality and add optional modules (Onboarding, AI Companion, Recruitment Marketing, Analytics) as needed. Organizations must request custom quotes through the sales team at (888) 885-5299.

Source
Metaview: What does Metaview cost?

The sourcing agent is free for the first 100 profiles, then 100 USD per user per month for Pro and 300 USD for Max. Other agents are priced separately and not all rates are published.

Jobvite: How does Jobvite pricing work?

Jobvite employs a modular approach where customers configure solutions based on requirements. The core applicant tracking system serves as the foundation, with additional modules available as add-ons. Exact pricing depends on company size, hiring complexity, and selected modules, requiring individual consultation.

Source
Metaview: Do candidates have to consent to recording?

Yes, in the EU and in two-party consent US states. Metaview provides the capture; obtaining and recording consent remains your legal obligation.

Metaview: Does it write back to my ATS?

Yes, to Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever, Workday and others, which is the main reason teams adopt it over a generic meeting recorder.

Metaview: Is it a replacement for an ATS?

No. It produces and files interview records. Requisitions, pipelines and offers stay in your applicant tracking system.

Share

Related pages

More on Jobvite

More on Metaview

Keep looking

Other head to heads