Softwr

Insurance · head to head

EIS Group vs InsuredMine

EIS Group logo

EIS Group

Insurance

Coretech platform for insurers, strongest in group and voluntary benefits

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
InsuredMine logo

InsuredMine

Insurance

Sales pipeline and client engagement layer that sits on top of an agency management system

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: EIS Group implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.; InsuredMine integration depth varies by agency management system, so capability demonstrated on one platform may not exist on yours and must be tested against live data before purchase.
  • They diverge on capability: EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, InsuredMine covers Agency management system sync.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which EIS Group and InsuredMine actually diverge.

Attributes where EIS Group and InsuredMine differ
AttributeEIS GroupInsuredMine
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in EIS Group

  • Group and voluntary benefits
  • OneSuite core applications
  • Open API layer
  • Cloud-native deployment
  • Multi-line support
  • Digital engagement

Only in InsuredMine

  • Agency management system sync
  • Sales pipelines
  • Automated campaigns
  • Client portal and mobile app
  • Renewal and X-date tracking
  • Producer analytics

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

EIS Group

  • A carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modellingnot InsuredMine
  • A multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendornot InsuredMine
  • A mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud accountnot InsuredMine
  • An insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suitenot InsuredMine

InsuredMine

  • An agency tracking new business pipeline and cross-sell that the agency management system does not report onnot EIS Group
  • A commercial agency managing prospect expiry dates alongside the in-force booknot EIS Group
  • An agency running renewal and birthday campaigns without exporting lists to a separate email toolnot EIS Group
  • A principal who wants producer activity reporting the agency management system cannot producenot EIS Group

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

EIS Group

  • Implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • The name recognition gap against Guidewire and Duck Creek means your reinsurers, auditors and incoming executives will ask you to justify the choice repeatedly over the life of the system.
  • Benefits strength does not transfer to personal lines, where you are comparing on general capability and the incumbents have more comparable references.
  • The microservices architecture that makes the platform flexible also raises the operational bar; carriers without a mature platform engineering function end up paying the vendor or an integrator to run it.
  • Licence costs are quoted per programme and scale with premium or policy volume, so a book that grows faster than forecast produces a renewal conversation you have little leverage in.

InsuredMine

  • Integration depth varies by agency management system, so capability demonstrated on one platform may not exist on yours and must be tested against live data before purchase.
  • It adds a second place where client data lives, and when the sync disagrees with the agency management system staff have to know which one to trust.
  • It cannot repair poor data hygiene in the underlying system; duplicate clients and missing expiry dates simply propagate into the pipeline.
  • Pricing is per user, so agencies with many part-time or service-only staff pay for seats that generate no pipeline activity.
  • It depends on continued integration access to systems built by Applied and Vertafore, both of whom sell competing sales and marketing modules, which is a strategic dependency outside the vendor control.

Pricing, plan by plan

EIS Group

On request
  • EIS OneSuite$undefined/year
    • Policy, billing, claims and customer applications
    • Cloud deployment
    • API access

InsuredMine

On request
  • InsuredMine$undefined/year
    • Pipeline and CRM
    • Agency management system integration
    • Campaign automation

Which should you pick?

Choose EIS Group if

  • You need group and voluntary benefits.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want onesuite core applications.
EIS Group review

Choose InsuredMine if

  • You need agency management system sync.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want sales pipelines.
InsuredMine review

Questions people ask

Is EIS Group or InsuredMine better?
Neither clearly leads. EIS Group starts at On request and InsuredMine at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, EIS Group or InsuredMine?
EIS Group starts at On request and InsuredMine at On request.
Does EIS Group or InsuredMine run on more platforms?
EIS Group runs on Web, API. InsuredMine runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is EIS Group best used for?
EIS Group is most often used for a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling, a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor, a mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud account, an insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suite. Of those, a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling and a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor are not what InsuredMine is typically brought in for.
What can EIS Group do that InsuredMine cannot?
EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, OneSuite core applications, Open API layer, Cloud-native deployment. InsuredMine covers Agency management system sync, Sales pipelines, Automated campaigns, Client portal and mobile app.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

EIS Group: Who is EIS actually best for?

Carriers writing group or voluntary benefits, where the alternative is heavy customisation of a property and casualty platform that was never designed to model an employer group.

InsuredMine: Does it replace our agency management system?

No, and it does not try to. Policy history and carrier download stay in the agency management system; InsuredMine adds the sales and engagement layer on top.

EIS Group: Can it run in our own cloud account?

Yes. It is container-based and is deployed in customer-controlled cloud tenancies as well as the vendor cloud, which matters for carriers with data residency obligations.

InsuredMine: Which agency management systems does it work with best?

It connects to Applied Epic, AMS360, EZLynx and HawkSoft, but the depth of each connection differs. Insist on a trial against your own system before committing.

EIS Group: How much of the outcome depends on the integrator?

Most of it. Budget for the delivery partner as the larger line item and check references for the specific practice team, not the firm.

InsuredMine: Is it worth it for a small agency?

If pipeline and renewal follow-up currently live in spreadsheets, usually yes. If your agency management system already reports adequately on those, the overlap is larger than the gain.

Share

Related pages

More on EIS Group

More on InsuredMine

Keep looking

Other head to heads