Softwr

Insurance · head to head

EIS Group vs Policyholders

EIS Group logo

EIS Group

Insurance

Coretech platform for insurers, strongest in group and voluntary benefits

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
P

Policyholders

Insurance

Insurance platform for brokers and agents

From
$99/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • They diverge on capability: EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, Policyholders covers Policy management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which EIS Group and Policyholders actually diverge.

Attributes where EIS Group and Policyholders differ
AttributeEIS GroupPolicyholders
Starting priceOn request$99/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Ios, Android
FoundedUnknown2010

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in EIS Group

  • Group and voluntary benefits
  • OneSuite core applications
  • Open API layer
  • Cloud-native deployment
  • Multi-line support
  • Digital engagement

Only in Policyholders

  • Policy management
  • Client management
  • Commission tracking
  • Document storage
  • Task management
  • Calendar integration
  • Reporting and analytics
  • Mobile app

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

EIS Group

  • A carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modellingnot Policyholders
  • A multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendornot Policyholders
  • A mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud accountnot Policyholders
  • An insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suitenot Policyholders

Policyholders

  • Policy administrationnot EIS Group
  • Client managementnot EIS Group
  • Commission trackingnot EIS Group
  • Agency operationsnot EIS Group

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

EIS Group

  • Implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • The name recognition gap against Guidewire and Duck Creek means your reinsurers, auditors and incoming executives will ask you to justify the choice repeatedly over the life of the system.
  • Benefits strength does not transfer to personal lines, where you are comparing on general capability and the incumbents have more comparable references.
  • The microservices architecture that makes the platform flexible also raises the operational bar; carriers without a mature platform engineering function end up paying the vendor or an integrator to run it.
  • Licence costs are quoted per programme and scale with premium or policy volume, so a book that grows faster than forecast produces a renewal conversation you have little leverage in.

Policyholders

Nothing recorded yet. See the Policyholders review.

Pricing, plan by plan

EIS Group

On request
  • EIS OneSuite$undefined/year
    • Policy, billing, claims and customer applications
    • Cloud deployment
    • API access

Policyholders

$99/month
  • Starter$99/month
    • Policy management
    • Client tracking
    • Basic reporting
  • Professional$299/month
    • All Starter features
    • Commission tracking
    • Advanced analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose EIS Group if

  • You need group and voluntary benefits.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want onesuite core applications.
EIS Group review

Choose Policyholders if

  • You need policy management.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want client management.
Policyholders review

Questions people ask

Is EIS Group or Policyholders better?
Neither clearly leads. EIS Group starts at On request and Policyholders at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, EIS Group or Policyholders?
EIS Group starts at On request and Policyholders at $99/month.
Does EIS Group or Policyholders run on more platforms?
EIS Group runs on Web, API. Policyholders runs on Web, Ios, Android.
What is EIS Group best used for?
EIS Group is most often used for a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling, a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor, a mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud account, an insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suite. Of those, a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling and a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor are not what Policyholders is typically brought in for.
What can EIS Group do that Policyholders cannot?
EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, OneSuite core applications, Open API layer, Cloud-native deployment. Policyholders covers Policy management, Client management, Commission tracking, Document storage.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

EIS Group: Who is EIS actually best for?

Carriers writing group or voluntary benefits, where the alternative is heavy customisation of a property and casualty platform that was never designed to model an employer group.

EIS Group: Can it run in our own cloud account?

Yes. It is container-based and is deployed in customer-controlled cloud tenancies as well as the vendor cloud, which matters for carriers with data residency obligations.

EIS Group: How much of the outcome depends on the integrator?

Most of it. Budget for the delivery partner as the larger line item and check references for the specific practice team, not the firm.

Share

Related pages

More on EIS Group

More on Policyholders

Keep looking

Other head to heads