Insurance · head to head
EIS Group vs Openly

EIS Group
Insurance
Coretech platform for insurers, strongest in group and voluntary benefits
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Openly
Insurance
Customizable homeowners insurance sold only through independent agents
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: EIS Group implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.; Openly available in only 24 states as of August 2026, with Nevada still listed as coming soon
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which EIS Group and Openly actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in EIS Group
- Group and voluntary benefits
- OneSuite core applications
- Open API layer
- Cloud-native deployment
- Multi-line support
- Digital engagement
Only in Openly
Nothing recorded that EIS Group does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
EIS Group
- A carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modellingnot Openly
- A multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendornot Openly
- A mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud accountnot Openly
- An insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suitenot Openly
Openly
- Getting home insurance quotes with guaranteed replacement cost coveragenot EIS Group
- Customizing homeowners insurance policies with specific coverage limitsnot EIS Group
- Filing and managing property damage claims through digital workflowsnot EIS Group
- Accessing insurance coverage across multiple US states through independent agentsnot EIS Group
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
EIS Group
- Implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
- The name recognition gap against Guidewire and Duck Creek means your reinsurers, auditors and incoming executives will ask you to justify the choice repeatedly over the life of the system.
- Benefits strength does not transfer to personal lines, where you are comparing on general capability and the incumbents have more comparable references.
- The microservices architecture that makes the platform flexible also raises the operational bar; carriers without a mature platform engineering function end up paying the vendor or an integrator to run it.
- Licence costs are quoted per programme and scale with premium or policy volume, so a book that grows faster than forecast produces a renewal conversation you have little leverage in.
Openly
- Available in only 24 states as of August 2026, with Nevada still listed as coming soon
- Policies are not sold directly to consumers; coverage must be obtained through an independent agent, as of August 2026
Pricing, plan by plan
EIS Group
On request- EIS OneSuite$undefined/year
- Policy, billing, claims and customer applications
- Cloud deployment
- API access
Openly
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Openly review.
Which should you pick?
Choose EIS Group if
- You need group and voluntary benefits.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want onesuite core applications.
Choose Openly if
Nothing in the data separates Openly from EIS Group on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is EIS Group or Openly better?
- Neither clearly leads. EIS Group starts at On request and Openly at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, EIS Group or Openly?
- EIS Group starts at On request and Openly at On request.
- Does EIS Group or Openly run on more platforms?
- EIS Group runs on Web, API. Openly runs on Web.
- What is EIS Group best used for?
- EIS Group is most often used for a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling, a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor, a mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud account, an insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suite. Of those, a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling and a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor are not what Openly is typically brought in for.
- What can EIS Group do that Openly cannot?
- EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, OneSuite core applications, Open API layer, Cloud-native deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
EIS Group: Who is EIS actually best for?
Carriers writing group or voluntary benefits, where the alternative is heavy customisation of a property and casualty platform that was never designed to model an employer group.
Openly: How much does Openly cost?
Openly does not publish pricing on its website. The company operates through independent agency partners who provide customized quotes. To obtain coverage pricing, customers must contact a local independent agent or request a quote through mylifeprotected.com/openly.
SourceEIS Group: Can it run in our own cloud account?
Yes. It is container-based and is deployed in customer-controlled cloud tenancies as well as the vendor cloud, which matters for carriers with data residency obligations.
Openly: What is Openly's pricing model?
Openly uses a partnership model rather than direct sales. Insurance policies are sold through independent agency partners, with pricing determined on a case-by-case basis through customized quotes.
SourceEIS Group: How much of the outcome depends on the integrator?
Most of it. Budget for the delivery partner as the larger line item and check references for the specific practice team, not the firm.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- EIS Group vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- EIS Group vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- EIS Group vs Majesco
- EIS Group vs BriteCore
- EIS Group vs Socotra
- EIS Group vs Insurity Suite
- EIS Group vs INSTANDA
- EIS Group vs Duck Creek Policy
- EIS Group vs Origami Risk
- EIS Group vs Snapsheet Claims
- EIS Group vs Haven Life
- EIS Group vs Hippo
- EIS Group vs Indio
- EIS Group vs InsurancePro
- EIS Group vs InsuredMine
- EIS Group vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- EIS Group vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- EIS Group vs Duck Creek
- EIS Group vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- EIS Group vs Kin Insurance
- EIS Group vs Pie Insurance
- EIS Group vs EZLynx
- EIS Group vs Bold Penguin
- EIS Group vs Bolt Solutions
- EIS Group vs Embroker
- EIS Group vs AgencyBloc
- EIS Group vs Tarmika
- EIS Group vs AgencyZoom
- EIS Group vs Better Agency
- Openly vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Openly vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Openly vs Majesco
- Openly vs BriteCore
- Openly vs Socotra
- Openly vs Insurity Suite
- Openly vs INSTANDA
- Openly vs Duck Creek Policy
- Openly vs Origami Risk
- Openly vs Snapsheet Claims
- Openly vs Haven Life
- Openly vs Hippo
- Openly vs Indio
- Openly vs InsurancePro
- Openly vs InsuredMine
- Openly vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Openly vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Openly vs Duck Creek
- Openly vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Openly vs Kin Insurance
- Openly vs Pie Insurance
- Openly vs EZLynx
- Openly vs Bold Penguin
- Openly vs Bolt Solutions
- Openly vs Embroker
- Openly vs AgencyBloc
- Openly vs Tarmika
- Openly vs AgencyZoom
- Openly vs Better Agency
