Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Better Agency vs EIS Group

B

Better Agency

Insurance

Agency management for digital-first agencies

From
$199/month
Rated
-
EIS Group logo

EIS Group

Insurance

Coretech platform for insurers, strongest in group and voluntary benefits

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Better Agency better Agency's own vendor domain is betteragency.io, not betteragency.com as listed in the catalogue; betteragency.com is an unrelated web design firm (archived pricing captured at 4 April 2025); EIS Group implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • They diverge on capability: Better Agency covers Policy management, EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Better Agency and EIS Group actually diverge.

Attributes where Better Agency and EIS Group differ
AttributeBetter AgencyEIS Group
Starting price$199/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsWeb, Ios, AndroidWeb, API
Founded2018Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Better Agency

  • Policy management
  • Client portal
  • Workflow automation
  • Reporting
  • Document management
  • Mobile app
  • API access
  • Integration library

Only in EIS Group

  • Group and voluntary benefits
  • OneSuite core applications
  • Open API layer
  • Cloud-native deployment
  • Multi-line support
  • Digital engagement

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Better Agency

  • Automationnot EIS Group
  • Customer engagementnot EIS Group

EIS Group

  • A carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modellingnot Better Agency
  • A multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendornot Better Agency
  • A mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud accountnot Better Agency
  • An insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suitenot Better Agency

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Better Agency

  • Better Agency's own vendor domain is betteragency.io, not betteragency.com as listed in the catalogue; betteragency.com is an unrelated web design firm (archived pricing captured at 4 April 2025)
  • Base plan is $149 USD monthly and includes only 3 users; each additional user costs $35 USD per month on top (archived pricing page, 4 April 2025)
  • Paying annually is required to get a 10 percent discount off the monthly rate, with no other discount tier published (archived pricing page, 4 April 2025)

EIS Group

  • Implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • The name recognition gap against Guidewire and Duck Creek means your reinsurers, auditors and incoming executives will ask you to justify the choice repeatedly over the life of the system.
  • Benefits strength does not transfer to personal lines, where you are comparing on general capability and the incumbents have more comparable references.
  • The microservices architecture that makes the platform flexible also raises the operational bar; carriers without a mature platform engineering function end up paying the vendor or an integrator to run it.
  • Licence costs are quoted per programme and scale with premium or policy volume, so a book that grows faster than forecast produces a renewal conversation you have little leverage in.

Pricing, plan by plan

Better Agency

$199/month
  • Starter$199/month
    • Policy management
    • Client portal
    • Automation

EIS Group

On request
  • EIS OneSuite$undefined/year
    • Policy, billing, claims and customer applications
    • Cloud deployment
    • API access

Which should you pick?

Choose Better Agency if

  • You need policy management.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want client portal.

Choose EIS Group if

  • You need group and voluntary benefits.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want onesuite core applications.

Questions people ask

Is Better Agency or EIS Group better?
Neither clearly leads. Better Agency starts at $199/month and EIS Group at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Better Agency or EIS Group?
Better Agency starts at $199/month and EIS Group at On request.
Does Better Agency or EIS Group run on more platforms?
Better Agency runs on Web, Ios, Android. EIS Group runs on Web, API.
What is Better Agency best used for?
Better Agency is most often used for automation, customer engagement. Of those, automation and customer engagement are not what EIS Group is typically brought in for.
What can Better Agency do that EIS Group cannot?
Better Agency covers Policy management, Client portal, Workflow automation, Reporting. EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, OneSuite core applications, Open API layer, Cloud-native deployment.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

EIS Group: Who is EIS actually best for?

Carriers writing group or voluntary benefits, where the alternative is heavy customisation of a property and casualty platform that was never designed to model an employer group.

EIS Group: Can it run in our own cloud account?

Yes. It is container-based and is deployed in customer-controlled cloud tenancies as well as the vendor cloud, which matters for carriers with data residency obligations.

EIS Group: How much of the outcome depends on the integrator?

Most of it. Budget for the delivery partner as the larger line item and check references for the specific practice team, not the firm.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads