Softwr

Insurance · head to head

EIS Group vs Insurity Suite

EIS Group logo

EIS Group

Insurance

Coretech platform for insurers, strongest in group and voluntary benefits

From
On request
Rated
-
Insurity Suite logo

Insurity Suite

Insurance

End-to-end insurance software for modern carriers

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: EIS Group implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.; Insurity Suite subscription pricing based on modules and users with no transparent public pricing
  • They diverge on capability: EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, Insurity Suite covers Policy lifecycle management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which EIS Group and Insurity Suite actually diverge.

Attributes where EIS Group and Insurity Suite differ
AttributeEIS GroupInsurity Suite
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, APIWeb, Api, Mobile
FoundedUnknown2015

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in EIS Group

  • Group and voluntary benefits
  • OneSuite core applications
  • Open API layer
  • Cloud-native deployment
  • Multi-line support
  • Digital engagement

Only in Insurity Suite

  • Policy lifecycle management
  • Claims automation
  • Billing and payments
  • Document management
  • Underwriting workbench
  • Reinsurance management
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Analytics dashboard

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

EIS Group

  • A carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modellingnot Insurity Suite
  • A multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendornot Insurity Suite
  • A mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud accountnot Insurity Suite
  • An insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suitenot Insurity Suite

Insurity Suite

  • Policy administrationnot EIS Group
  • Claims processingnot EIS Group
  • Digital transformationnot EIS Group
  • Legacy modernizationnot EIS Group

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

EIS Group

  • Implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • The name recognition gap against Guidewire and Duck Creek means your reinsurers, auditors and incoming executives will ask you to justify the choice repeatedly over the life of the system.
  • Benefits strength does not transfer to personal lines, where you are comparing on general capability and the incumbents have more comparable references.
  • The microservices architecture that makes the platform flexible also raises the operational bar; carriers without a mature platform engineering function end up paying the vendor or an integrator to run it.
  • Licence costs are quoted per programme and scale with premium or policy volume, so a book that grows faster than forecast produces a renewal conversation you have little leverage in.

Insurity Suite

  • Subscription pricing based on modules and users with no transparent public pricing
  • Requires significant implementation and configuration to launch new products
  • Targeted primarily at MGAs and specialty carriers, not small independent agents

Pricing, plan by plan

EIS Group

On request
  • EIS OneSuite$undefined/year
    • Policy, billing, claims and customer applications
    • Cloud deployment
    • API access

Insurity Suite

On request
  • Core$undefined/month
    • Policy administration
    • Claims processing
    • Billing management
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • All Core features
    • Advanced analytics
    • Custom integrations

Which should you pick?

Choose EIS Group if

  • You need group and voluntary benefits.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want onesuite core applications.

Choose Insurity Suite if

  • You need policy lifecycle management.
  • You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
  • You also want claims automation.

Questions people ask

Is EIS Group or Insurity Suite better?
Neither clearly leads. EIS Group starts at On request and Insurity Suite at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, EIS Group or Insurity Suite?
EIS Group starts at On request and Insurity Suite at On request.
Does EIS Group or Insurity Suite run on more platforms?
EIS Group runs on Web, API. Insurity Suite runs on Web, Api, Mobile.
What is EIS Group best used for?
EIS Group is most often used for a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling, a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor, a mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud account, an insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suite. Of those, a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling and a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor are not what Insurity Suite is typically brought in for.
What can EIS Group do that Insurity Suite cannot?
EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, OneSuite core applications, Open API layer, Cloud-native deployment. Insurity Suite covers Policy lifecycle management, Claims automation, Billing and payments, Document management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

EIS Group: Who is EIS actually best for?

Carriers writing group or voluntary benefits, where the alternative is heavy customisation of a property and casualty platform that was never designed to model an employer group.

Insurity Suite: What does Insurity Pro Suite provide?

Insurity Pro Suite is a modular core platform for growing carriers and MGAs, providing enterprise-grade policy administration, integrated billing and accounting, and end-to-end claims management. It supports 20+ commercial and personal lines, E&S, and Lloyd's products.

Source
EIS Group: Can it run in our own cloud account?

Yes. It is container-based and is deployed in customer-controlled cloud tenancies as well as the vendor cloud, which matters for carriers with data residency obligations.

Insurity Suite: What is Insurity's Sure Personal Suite?

Insurity Sure Personal Suite provides cost-effective policy, billing, and claims solutions specifically designed for personal lines property and casualty carriers.

Source
EIS Group: How much of the outcome depends on the integrator?

Most of it. Budget for the delivery partner as the larger line item and check references for the specific practice team, not the firm.

Insurity Suite: Does Insurity use AI for underwriting?

Yes. Insurity Pro Suite includes an AI-powered risk assistant that identifies profitable submissions through risk scoring, evaluates submission data using artificial intelligence, and provides instant profitability scores to prioritize high-value risks.

Source
Insurity Suite: What claims processing speed does Insurity deliver?

Insurity enables digital claims payments that issue claim settlements in under thirty seconds via integrated ACH, virtual cards, or real-time payment processing rails.

Source
Insurity Suite: Does Insurity offer workflow configuration without coding?

Yes. Insurity provides workflow configuration that allows business users to modify underwriting and claims workflows through a visual interface without requiring software code or IT involvement.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads