Softwr

Insurance · head to head

EIS Group vs Majesco Policy for L&A

EIS Group logo

EIS Group

Insurance

Coretech platform for insurers, strongest in group and voluntary benefits

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Majesco Policy for L&A logo

Majesco Policy for L&A

Insurance

Modern policy administration for life & annuity

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: EIS Group implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.; Majesco Policy for L&A majesco Policy for L&A and Group publishes no price on its own brochure page; the entire page is built around "Request a Demo" and "Contact Us" links with no figure, tier name, or trial length given anywhere (archived brochure page, 18 May 2021)
  • They diverge on capability: EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, Majesco Policy for L&A covers Policy administration.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which EIS Group and Majesco Policy for L&A actually diverge.

Attributes where EIS Group and Majesco Policy for L&A differ
AttributeEIS GroupMajesco Policy for L&A
Pricing modelquotesubscription
FoundedUnknown1982

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, API), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in EIS Group

  • Group and voluntary benefits
  • OneSuite core applications
  • Open API layer
  • Cloud-native deployment
  • Multi-line support
  • Digital engagement

Only in Majesco Policy for L&A

  • Policy administration
  • Product factory
  • New business processing
  • Underwriting workbench
  • In-force management
  • Claims processing
  • Billing integration
  • Agent portal

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

EIS Group

  • A carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modellingnot Majesco Policy for L&A
  • A multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendornot Majesco Policy for L&A
  • A mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud accountnot Majesco Policy for L&A
  • An insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suitenot Majesco Policy for L&A

Majesco Policy for L&A

  • Policy administrationnot EIS Group
  • Product developmentnot EIS Group
  • New business processingnot EIS Group
  • In-force servicingnot EIS Group
  • Digital transformationnot EIS Group

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

EIS Group

  • Implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • The name recognition gap against Guidewire and Duck Creek means your reinsurers, auditors and incoming executives will ask you to justify the choice repeatedly over the life of the system.
  • Benefits strength does not transfer to personal lines, where you are comparing on general capability and the incumbents have more comparable references.
  • The microservices architecture that makes the platform flexible also raises the operational bar; carriers without a mature platform engineering function end up paying the vendor or an integrator to run it.
  • Licence costs are quoted per programme and scale with premium or policy volume, so a book that grows faster than forecast produces a renewal conversation you have little leverage in.

Majesco Policy for L&A

  • Majesco Policy for L&A and Group publishes no price on its own brochure page; the entire page is built around "Request a Demo" and "Contact Us" links with no figure, tier name, or trial length given anywhere (archived brochure page, 18 May 2021)

Pricing, plan by plan

EIS Group

On request
  • EIS OneSuite$undefined/year
    • Policy, billing, claims and customer applications
    • Cloud deployment
    • API access

Majesco Policy for L&A

On request
  • Cloud Platform$undefined/year
    • Policy administration
    • Product configuration
    • New business processing
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • All Cloud features
    • Advanced underwriting
    • Custom integrations

Which should you pick?

Choose EIS Group if

  • You need group and voluntary benefits.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want onesuite core applications.
EIS Group review

Choose Majesco Policy for L&A if

  • You need policy administration.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want product factory.
Majesco Policy for L&A review

Questions people ask

Is EIS Group or Majesco Policy for L&A better?
Neither clearly leads. EIS Group starts at On request and Majesco Policy for L&A at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, EIS Group or Majesco Policy for L&A?
EIS Group starts at On request and Majesco Policy for L&A at On request.
Does EIS Group or Majesco Policy for L&A run on more platforms?
EIS Group runs on Web, API. Majesco Policy for L&A runs on Web, Api.
What is EIS Group best used for?
EIS Group is most often used for a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling, a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor, a mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud account, an insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suite. Of those, a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling and a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor are not what Majesco Policy for L&A is typically brought in for.
What can EIS Group do that Majesco Policy for L&A cannot?
EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, OneSuite core applications, Open API layer, Cloud-native deployment. Majesco Policy for L&A covers Policy administration, Product factory, New business processing, Underwriting workbench.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

EIS Group: Who is EIS actually best for?

Carriers writing group or voluntary benefits, where the alternative is heavy customisation of a property and casualty platform that was never designed to model an employer group.

EIS Group: Can it run in our own cloud account?

Yes. It is container-based and is deployed in customer-controlled cloud tenancies as well as the vendor cloud, which matters for carriers with data residency obligations.

EIS Group: How much of the outcome depends on the integrator?

Most of it. Budget for the delivery partner as the larger line item and check references for the specific practice team, not the firm.

Share

Related pages

More on EIS Group

More on Majesco Policy for L&A

Keep looking

Other head to heads