Technology · head to head
Height vs Teamhood
Height
Technology
A project management tool from a small independent vendor that uses AI agents to handle routine ticket maintenance.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Teamhood
Project Management
Visual project management for teams of all sizes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Height it is one product from one small venture-funded company with no second line of business underwriting it, so adopting it as your system of record is a bet on that company's funding, and the tool holds work history you would have to reconstruct elsewhere if the bet fails.; Teamhood the free plan caps storage at 100 MB
- They diverge on capability: Height covers Autonomous triage, Teamhood covers Kanban boards.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Height and Teamhood actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Height
- Autonomous triage
- Duplicate detection
- Attribute maintenance
- Per-task chat
- Multiple views
- Developer integrations
- Custom fields and filters
- Public API
Only in Teamhood
- Kanban boards
- Gantt charts
- Workload view
- Time tracking
- Reports
- Slack
- Microsoft Teams
- Google Calendar
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Height
- A product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has timenot Teamhood
- Teams leaving Jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worthnot Teamhood
- A support or intake queue where incoming requests need categorising and deduplicating before anyone can plan themnot Teamhood
- Startups that want tasks, chat and progress tracking in one tool rather than stitching a tracker to a chat appnot Teamhood
Teamhood
- Team project and task managementnot Height
- Workload and portfolio managementnot Height
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Height
- It is one product from one small venture-funded company with no second line of business underwriting it, so adopting it as your system of record is a bet on that company's funding, and the tool holds work history you would have to reconstruct elsewhere if the bet fails.
- The 2024 relaunch as Height 2.0 reoriented the product around AI agents and changed workflows customers had already built on, which is the clearest available evidence of how much the product may be re-shaped again under you.
- The ecosystem is small next to Jira, Linear and Asana: fewer third-party integrations, no consultancy market, and far less written material to search when something behaves unexpectedly, so support questions go to the vendor and wait.
- The automation only pays off if tasks contain enough substance for a model to work with; on a team whose tickets are two-word titles, the agents have nothing to triage or deduplicate and the product reduces to an ordinary tracker at a premium.
- Task content is processed by hosted large language models, so a security review becomes a question about subprocessors and data handling, and there is no self-hosted or on-premises deployment to fall back on if the answer is unacceptable.
- There is no widely used two-way synchronisation with Jira, so an organisation where one team adopts Height and the rest stay on Jira ends up with two systems of record and manual reconciliation between them.
Teamhood
- The free plan caps storage at 100 MB
- Time tracking, reporting, custom fields and workload management all require the Team plan
- Automation runs are metered monthly, at roughly 50 on Team, 200 on Business and 500 on Enterprise
- API access is Business only and rate limited to 100 requests a minute
- Paid plans carry a 3 user minimum and Enterprise a 25 user minimum
- SSO, SAML and SCIM are Enterprise only with no published price
Pricing, plan by plan
Height
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Height review.
Teamhood
Free- PersonalFree
- Up to 10 users
- Teamhood AI
- Unlimited projects
- Team$9/month
- Billed annually (€14/month if monthly)
- Time tracking
- Workload management
- Business$18/month
- Billed annually (€22/month if monthly)
- Portfolio reports
- Private boards
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom pricing
- Flexible data hosting
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Height if
- You need autonomous triage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want duplicate detection.
Choose Teamhood if
- You need kanban boards.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want gantt charts.
Questions people ask
- Is Height or Teamhood better?
- Neither clearly leads. Height starts at Free and Teamhood at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Height or Teamhood?
- Height starts at Free and Teamhood at Free.
- Does Height or Teamhood run on more platforms?
- Height runs on Web. Teamhood runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Height for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Height best used for?
- Height is most often used for a product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has time, teams leaving jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worth, a support or intake queue where incoming requests need categorising and deduplicating before anyone can plan them, startups that want tasks, chat and progress tracking in one tool rather than stitching a tracker to a chat app. Of those, a product or engineering team with no dedicated project manager, where backlog upkeep currently falls on whoever has time and teams leaving jira because its configuration and administration cost more attention than the tracking is worth are not what Teamhood is typically brought in for.
- What can Height do that Teamhood cannot?
- Height covers Autonomous triage, Duplicate detection, Attribute maintenance, Per-task chat. Teamhood covers Kanban boards, Gantt charts, Workload view, Time tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Height: How is this different from Jira automation?
Jira automation is rule-based: you define a trigger and an action. Height's agents read the content of tasks and act on judgement, such as recognising that two tickets describe the same bug, which no rule can express.
Teamhood: How much does Teamhood cost?
Teamhood offers a free Personal plan and paid plans from €9/month (annual billing) or €14/month (monthly) for Team tier.
SourceHeight: Can we self-host it?
No. It is software as a service only, with no on-premises or private-cloud deployment. If your requirements rule out a hosted tracker, this is not a candidate.
Teamhood: Is there a free trial for Teamhood?
Yes, Teamhood provides a 14-day free trial for paid plans without requiring a credit card.
SourceHeight: What happens to our data if the company fails?
You would need an export and a migration to another tool. This is the standard risk with a single-product startup, and it is worth confirming the export path covers task history, comments and custom fields before committing to it.
Teamhood: What are Teamhood's pricing differences between annual and monthly billing?
Team tier is €9/month with annual billing or €14/month with monthly billing. Business tier is €18/month annually or €22/month monthly. Annual plans save approximately 35%.
SourceHeight: Does it work for non-engineering teams?
Yes, the views and custom fields are generic enough for marketing, operations or support queues. Its integrations, though, are aimed at software teams, so a non-engineering team gets less of the surrounding value.
Height: Do the AI features need our tickets to be well written?
In practice, yes. Triage, deduplication and attribute maintenance work from what is written in the task, so the return is much higher on a team that already writes descriptive tickets than on one that does not.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Height vs Asana
- Height vs ClickUp
- Height vs Linear
- Height vs Monday.com
- Height vs Shortcut
- Height vs Coda
- Height vs Intercom
- Height vs Attio
- Height vs Jenkins
- Height vs Kubernetes
- Height vs Notion
- Height vs Figma
- Height vs Site24x7
- Height vs StatusCake
- Height vs Storybook
- Height vs WebStorm
- Height vs Zabbix Cloud
- Height vs Trello
- Height vs Basecamp
- Height vs Clockwise
- Height vs Reclaim.ai
- Height vs MeisterTask
- Height vs Teamgantt
- Height vs GanttPRO
- Height vs Kanbanize
- Height vs Freedcamp
- Height vs Toggl Plan
- Height vs ProofHub
- Height vs Taskade
- Height vs Visor
- Height vs Zoho Projects
- Height vs Hive
- Height vs Huly
- Height vs LiquidPlanner
- Teamhood vs Asana
- Teamhood vs ClickUp
- Teamhood vs Linear
- Teamhood vs Monday.com
- Teamhood vs Shortcut
- Teamhood vs Coda
- Teamhood vs Intercom
- Teamhood vs Attio
- Teamhood vs Jenkins
- Teamhood vs Kubernetes
- Teamhood vs Notion
- Teamhood vs Figma
- Teamhood vs Site24x7
- Teamhood vs StatusCake
- Teamhood vs Storybook
- Teamhood vs WebStorm
- Teamhood vs Zabbix Cloud
- Teamhood vs Trello
- Teamhood vs Basecamp
- Teamhood vs Clockwise
- Teamhood vs Reclaim.ai
- Teamhood vs MeisterTask
- Teamhood vs Teamgantt
- Teamhood vs GanttPRO
- Teamhood vs Kanbanize
- Teamhood vs Freedcamp
- Teamhood vs Toggl Plan
- Teamhood vs ProofHub
- Teamhood vs Taskade
- Teamhood vs Visor
- Teamhood vs Zoho Projects
- Teamhood vs Hive
- Teamhood vs Huly
- Teamhood vs LiquidPlanner
