Business Intelligence · head to head
Glassbox vs SAP Concur

SAP Concur
Accounting
Enterprise travel booking, expense claims and supplier invoice processing sold as separate modules
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Glassbox no fixed pricing tiers published; custom quotes required based on package, data retention, and session volume; SAP Concur implementation is done through SAP or a partner and commonly costs a substantial multiple of the first year subscription, because the value sits entirely in the configured policy, approval hierarchy and ledger mapping rather than in the software as shipped.
- They diverge on capability: Glassbox covers Session Replay, SAP Concur covers Expense capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Glassbox and SAP Concur actually diverge.
| Attribute | Glassbox | SAP Concur |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $29/month |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile, Hybrid | Web, Ios, Android |
| Category | Business Intelligence | Accounting |
| Founded | 2010 | 1993 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Glassbox
- Session Replay
- Struggle Detection
- Journey Mapping
- AI Insights
- Voice of Customer
- Adobe Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Salesforce
Only in SAP Concur
- Expense capture
- Corporate card feeds
- Policy engine
- Approval routing
- Travel booking
- Travel agency integration
- Duty of care
- Invoice capture
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Glassbox
- User experience analysisnot SAP Concur
- Bug reproductionnot SAP Concur
- Conversion optimizationnot SAP Concur
- Customer journey mappingnot SAP Concur
- Usability testingnot SAP Concur
SAP Concur
- A multinational with thousands of travellers where an audit committee has asked for evidence that travel policy is actually enforcednot Glassbox
- An organisation replacing spreadsheet expense claims and email approvals that cannot survive an external auditnot Glassbox
- A finance team trying to eliminate duplicate claims by matching corporate card feeds against submitted receiptsnot Glassbox
- A shared service centre processing high volumes of supplier invoices that needs capture and approval routing before postingnot Glassbox
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Glassbox
- No fixed pricing tiers published; custom quotes required based on package, data retention, and session volume
SAP Concur
- Implementation is done through SAP or a partner and commonly costs a substantial multiple of the first year subscription, because the value sits entirely in the configured policy, approval hierarchy and ledger mapping rather than in the software as shipped.
- Pricing is driven by transaction volume, expense reports and invoices processed, rather than by seats, so a business with seasonal travel or a growth year sees the bill move in ways headcount based budgeting does not predict.
- The configuration that makes it valuable is also what makes it rigid, and organisations frequently find that changing an approval chain or adding a cost centre dimension requires a partner change order rather than an administrator's afternoon.
- Contracts are typically multi year with limited exit, so an organisation that concludes after twelve months that a lighter expense tool would have been enough is still paying for the heavier one for the remainder of the term.
- The three modules are licensed separately and the strongest case for the product depends on having travel, expense and card feeds together, so buying expense alone gives you a costly receipt system without the control loop that justifies the price.
Pricing, plan by plan
Glassbox
On request- CustomFree
- Full Platform
- Mobile Analytics
- Enterprise Support
SAP Concur
$29/month- Professional$8/month
- Expense reporting
- Receipt capture
- Approvals
- Premium$12/month
- Travel booking
- Invoice management
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Glassbox if
- You need session replay.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Hybrid.
- You also want struggle detection.
Choose SAP Concur if
- You need expense capture.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want corporate card feeds.
Questions people ask
- Is Glassbox or SAP Concur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Glassbox starts at On request and SAP Concur at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Glassbox or SAP Concur?
- Glassbox starts at On request and SAP Concur at $29/month.
- Does Glassbox or SAP Concur run on more platforms?
- Glassbox runs on Web, Mobile, Hybrid. SAP Concur runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is Glassbox best used for?
- Glassbox is most often used for user experience analysis, bug reproduction, conversion optimization, customer journey mapping. Of those, user experience analysis and bug reproduction are not what SAP Concur is typically brought in for.
- What can Glassbox do that SAP Concur cannot?
- Glassbox covers Session Replay, Struggle Detection, Journey Mapping, AI Insights. SAP Concur covers Expense capture, Corporate card feeds, Policy engine, Approval routing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Glassbox: How much does Glassbox cost?
Glassbox uses custom pricing based on three factors: the selected package (Production Operation, Marketing/Business, or Product), data retention period, and session volume. The vendor encourages contacting sales to build customized packages.
SourceSAP Concur: Do we need SAP ERP to use Concur?
No. It integrates with SAP systems particularly well but it is regularly deployed alongside Oracle, NetSuite, Workday and other ledgers. The integration work is a line item in the implementation either way.
Glassbox: Does Glassbox offer add-ons for specific industries?
Yes, Glassbox offers specialized add-on solutions including fraud prevention, accessibility features, and call center solutions tailored for financial organizations.
SourceSAP Concur: Is it worth it for a company of a hundred people?
Usually not. Below a few hundred travellers the implementation cost and the contract commitment are hard to justify against lighter expense tools. The case turns on policy enforcement and audit, not on receipt scanning.
SAP Concur: How is it priced?
Broadly on the volume of expense reports and invoices processed, with the modules licensed separately. Because pricing is quoted rather than published, get the volume assumptions written into the contract and check what happens when you exceed them.
SAP Concur: Can it handle multiple countries and currencies?
Yes, that is one of its stronger areas, including per country tax treatment and VAT reclaim identification. Confirm coverage for your specific countries during the sales process rather than assuming global means every jurisdiction.
SAP Concur: How long does implementation take?
Plan in months, not weeks, for anything beyond a single entity with simple approvals. Multi entity rollouts with travel and invoice modules commonly run across a year in phases.
SAP Concur: What does the audit service actually do?
It has a team review a sample or all of your submitted claims against receipts and policy before approval, which some organisations use in place of internal reviewers. It is priced separately from the expense subscription.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Glassbox vs MicroStrategy
- Glassbox vs Sisense
- Glassbox vs Power BI
- Glassbox vs Amazon QuickSight
- Glassbox vs Quantum Metric
- Glassbox vs Dundas BI
- Glassbox vs Anaplan
- Glassbox vs GoodData
- Glassbox vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- Glassbox vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- Glassbox vs SAP BusinessObjects
- Glassbox vs ChartMogul
- Glassbox vs NetBase Quid
- Glassbox vs Phocas
- Glassbox vs Preset
- Glassbox vs ProfitWell
- Glassbox vs Quid
- Glassbox vs Happay
- Glassbox vs Expensify
- Glassbox vs Airbase
- Glassbox vs Medius Expense
- Glassbox vs Ramp
- Glassbox vs QuickBooks
- Glassbox vs Melio
- Glassbox vs Circula
- Glassbox vs Zoho Expense
- Glassbox vs Spendesk
- Glassbox vs Fyle
- Glassbox vs Rydoo
- Glassbox vs Fortnox
- Glassbox vs FreeAgent
- Glassbox vs freee
- Glassbox vs insightsoftware
- Glassbox vs IRIS KashFlow
- SAP Concur vs MicroStrategy
- SAP Concur vs Sisense
- SAP Concur vs Power BI
- SAP Concur vs Amazon QuickSight
- SAP Concur vs Quantum Metric
- SAP Concur vs Dundas BI
- SAP Concur vs Anaplan
- SAP Concur vs GoodData
- SAP Concur vs IBM Cognos Analytics
- SAP Concur vs Oracle Analytics Cloud
- SAP Concur vs SAP BusinessObjects
- SAP Concur vs ChartMogul
- SAP Concur vs NetBase Quid
- SAP Concur vs Phocas
- SAP Concur vs Preset
- SAP Concur vs ProfitWell
- SAP Concur vs Quid
- SAP Concur vs Happay
- SAP Concur vs Expensify
- SAP Concur vs Airbase
- SAP Concur vs Medius Expense
- SAP Concur vs Ramp
- SAP Concur vs QuickBooks
- SAP Concur vs Melio
- SAP Concur vs Circula
- SAP Concur vs Zoho Expense
- SAP Concur vs Spendesk
- SAP Concur vs Fyle
- SAP Concur vs Rydoo
- SAP Concur vs Fortnox
- SAP Concur vs FreeAgent
- SAP Concur vs freee
- SAP Concur vs insightsoftware
- SAP Concur vs IRIS KashFlow

