Softwr

Insurance · head to head

EIS Group vs Five Sigma

EIS Group logo

EIS Group

Insurance

Coretech platform for insurers, strongest in group and voluntary benefits

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Five Sigma logo

Five Sigma

Insurance

Cloud claims management with decision support aimed at insurers who cannot fund a full core programme

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: EIS Group implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.; Five Sigma the reference base is small compared with established claims vendors, so procurement and audit committees will ask for viability assurances you cannot fully answer.
  • They diverge on capability: EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, Five Sigma covers Claim file management.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which EIS Group and Five Sigma actually diverge.

Attributes where EIS Group and Five Sigma differ
AttributeEIS GroupFive Sigma

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, API), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in EIS Group

  • Group and voluntary benefits
  • OneSuite core applications
  • Open API layer
  • Cloud-native deployment
  • Multi-line support
  • Digital engagement

Only in Five Sigma

  • Claim file management
  • Automation rules
  • Adjuster decision support
  • Vendor and litigation management
  • Configurable lines
  • Reporting and data export

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

EIS Group

  • A carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modellingnot Five Sigma
  • A multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendornot Five Sigma
  • A mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud accountnot Five Sigma
  • An insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suitenot Five Sigma

Five Sigma

  • A third-party administrator replacing a homegrown claims system without a multi-year programmenot EIS Group
  • An MGA taking claims handling in house from a delegated authority arrangementnot EIS Group
  • A mid-sized carrier that needs a modern claims system but cannot fund a core suite replacementnot EIS Group
  • A programme business that must report claims data to capacity providers in a consistent formatnot EIS Group

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

EIS Group

  • Implementations run for years and the integrator you choose determines whether the programme lands, so a strong software evaluation with a weak partner selection still fails.
  • The name recognition gap against Guidewire and Duck Creek means your reinsurers, auditors and incoming executives will ask you to justify the choice repeatedly over the life of the system.
  • Benefits strength does not transfer to personal lines, where you are comparing on general capability and the incumbents have more comparable references.
  • The microservices architecture that makes the platform flexible also raises the operational bar; carriers without a mature platform engineering function end up paying the vendor or an integrator to run it.
  • Licence costs are quoted per programme and scale with premium or policy volume, so a book that grows faster than forecast produces a renewal conversation you have little leverage in.

Five Sigma

  • The reference base is small compared with established claims vendors, so procurement and audit committees will ask for viability assurances you cannot fully answer.
  • Automation benefits depend entirely on your claim mix, and a book with high-complexity liability claims sees far less handling time reduction than a high-volume property book.
  • There is almost no third-party integrator market, so implementation, configuration and later changes route through the vendor and its capacity becomes your constraint.
  • Deep integration with legacy policy systems is your responsibility, and claims platforms are only as useful as the policy and coverage data flowing into them.
  • Regulatory reporting for many United States states is not as complete out of the box as it is on platforms that have served American carriers for decades, so expect some reporting build.

Pricing, plan by plan

EIS Group

On request
  • EIS OneSuite$undefined/year
    • Policy, billing, claims and customer applications
    • Cloud deployment
    • API access

Five Sigma

On request
  • Five Sigma Claims$undefined/year
    • Claims administration
    • Automation and decision support
    • Configurable lines of business

Which should you pick?

Choose EIS Group if

  • You need group and voluntary benefits.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want onesuite core applications.
EIS Group review

Choose Five Sigma if

  • You need claim file management.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want automation rules.
Five Sigma review

Questions people ask

Is EIS Group or Five Sigma better?
Neither clearly leads. EIS Group starts at On request and Five Sigma at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, EIS Group or Five Sigma?
EIS Group starts at On request and Five Sigma at On request.
Does EIS Group or Five Sigma run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, API, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is EIS Group best used for?
EIS Group is most often used for a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling, a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor, a mainframe replacement where the target architecture must run in the carrier own cloud account, an insurer that needs core services callable individually rather than one monolithic suite. Of those, a carrier launching worksite or voluntary benefits products that need employer group and enrolment modelling and a multi-line insurer consolidating property, life and benefits books onto one core vendor are not what Five Sigma is typically brought in for.
What can EIS Group do that Five Sigma cannot?
EIS Group covers Group and voluntary benefits, OneSuite core applications, Open API layer, Cloud-native deployment. Five Sigma covers Claim file management, Automation rules, Adjuster decision support, Vendor and litigation management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

EIS Group: Who is EIS actually best for?

Carriers writing group or voluntary benefits, where the alternative is heavy customisation of a property and casualty platform that was never designed to model an employer group.

Five Sigma: Who is the typical buyer?

Third-party administrators, MGAs and small to mid-sized carriers that need a real claims system without a core suite budget.

EIS Group: Can it run in our own cloud account?

Yes. It is container-based and is deployed in customer-controlled cloud tenancies as well as the vendor cloud, which matters for carriers with data residency obligations.

Five Sigma: How does it compare with Guidewire ClaimCenter?

ClaimCenter has far more depth, references and integrator support, and costs correspondingly more with a longer implementation. Five Sigma competes on time to live.

EIS Group: How much of the outcome depends on the integrator?

Most of it. Budget for the delivery partner as the larger line item and check references for the specific practice team, not the firm.

Five Sigma: What should we test in a pilot?

Adjuster handling time on your own claim mix. The commercial case rests on that measurement, not on the feature list.

Share

Related pages

More on EIS Group

More on Five Sigma

Keep looking

Other head to heads