Maps · head to head
IndoorAtlas vs QGIS

IndoorAtlas
Maps
Indoor positioning and navigation solutions using the Earth's magnetic field, WiFi, and Bluetooth beacons
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
QGIS
Maps
Free, open-source desktop GIS application that supports viewing, editing, and analysis of
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IndoorAtlas requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue; QGIS requires technical knowledge to use effectively for advanced GIS analysis
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IndoorAtlas and QGIS actually diverge.
| Attribute | IndoorAtlas | QGIS |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: pricing model (freemium), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IndoorAtlas
Nothing recorded that QGIS does not also cover.
Only in QGIS
Nothing recorded that IndoorAtlas does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IndoorAtlas
- Routing customers to deals in large retail spacesnot QGIS
- Guiding visitors through shopping centers and airportsnot QGIS
- Optimizing workplace space with movement analyticsnot QGIS
- Tracking dwell times and visitor movement patternsnot QGIS
QGIS
- Creating thematic maps showing population density by regionnot IndoorAtlas
- Digitizing building footprints from satellite imagery for urban planningnot IndoorAtlas
- Analyzing proximity of retail stores to competitor locationsnot IndoorAtlas
- Performing spatial analysis of wildlife habitat suitabilitynot IndoorAtlas
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IndoorAtlas
- Requires labor-intensive fingerprinting process, walking every corridor to build magnetic map for each venue
- Magnetic signatures degrade over time, requiring periodic re-fingerprinting as the environment changes
- Magnetic interference from external sources and devices disrupts positioning accuracy
- Positioning inconsistent across different smartphone models due to magnetometer heterogeneity
- High cost to deploy and maintain, with expensive implementation for wide-scale adaptation
QGIS
- Requires technical knowledge to use effectively for advanced GIS analysis
- Desktop application does not include built-in web publishing capabilities
Pricing, plan by plan
IndoorAtlas
Free- TrialFree
- 1 venue
- 10 end-users
- 14 days data retention
- Develop Lite$59/month
- 1 venue
- 20 end-users
- 30 days data retention
- Develop$400/month
- unlimited venues
- 50 end-users
- 1 hour monthly support
- Pro$349/month per venue
- unlimited venues and end-users
- supports up to 10,000 m² per venue
- basic technical support
QGIS
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the QGIS review.
Which should you pick?
Choose IndoorAtlas if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
Questions people ask
- Is IndoorAtlas or QGIS better?
- Neither clearly leads. IndoorAtlas starts at Free and QGIS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IndoorAtlas or QGIS?
- IndoorAtlas has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for IndoorAtlas and On request for QGIS.
- Does IndoorAtlas or QGIS run on more platforms?
- IndoorAtlas runs on iOS, Android, Web. QGIS runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use IndoorAtlas for free?
- Yes. IndoorAtlas has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. QGIS starts at On request.
- What is IndoorAtlas best used for?
- IndoorAtlas is most often used for routing customers to deals in large retail spaces, guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports, optimizing workplace space with movement analytics, tracking dwell times and visitor movement patterns. Of those, routing customers to deals in large retail spaces and guiding visitors through shopping centers and airports are not what QGIS is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IndoorAtlas: How does IndoorAtlas determine positioning without beacons or hardware?
IndoorAtlas uses patented geomagnetic fusion technology that maps the Earth's magnetic field patterns inside buildings through a process called magnetic fingerprinting. The technology combines magnetometer data with other sensors like WiFi and Bluetooth for robust positioning.
SourceQGIS: Is QGIS free and open source?
Yes. QGIS is free and open-source software, licensed under the GNU General Public License, available for download and modification by anyone.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What is the initial setup process for IndoorAtlas?
Setup requires fingerprinting the venue by systematically walking through all corridors and spaces to build a magnetic map. The platform then identifies problematic areas through red (conflicting data), blue (insufficient coverage), and path orientation errors that require correction before the map is production-ready.
SourceQGIS: What operating systems does QGIS support?
QGIS runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, with installers available for each platform.
SourceIndoorAtlas: What are IndoorAtlas's pricing plans?
IndoorAtlas offers production subscriptions starting at 349 euros per month per venue, with a development plan at 400 euros per month. A free tier is available for developers to start building.
SourceIndoorAtlas: How accurate is IndoorAtlas positioning?
IndoorAtlas claims industry-leading accuracy down to 50 centimeters using its 6-layer sensor fusion core across diverse environments, though accuracy varies based on building magnetic patterns and requires careful calibration.
SourceRelated pages
More on IndoorAtlas
Other head to heads
- IndoorAtlas vs Mappedin
- IndoorAtlas vs Esri ArcGIS
- IndoorAtlas vs CesiumJS
- IndoorAtlas vs SW Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs Felt
- IndoorAtlas vs Leica Infinity
- IndoorAtlas vs Navmii GPS
- IndoorAtlas vs Transit
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapbox
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps Platform
- IndoorAtlas vs LocationIQ
- IndoorAtlas vs Lonboard
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapillary
- IndoorAtlas vs MapQuest
- IndoorAtlas vs MAPS.ME
- IndoorAtlas vs Mapzen
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Survey123
- IndoorAtlas vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- IndoorAtlas vs GRASS GIS
- IndoorAtlas vs WhiteboxTools
- IndoorAtlas vs Global Mapper
- IndoorAtlas vs SAGA GIS
- IndoorAtlas vs Agisoft Metashape
- IndoorAtlas vs Atlas.co
- IndoorAtlas vs Emlid Studio
- IndoorAtlas vs Leaflet
- IndoorAtlas vs Potree
- IndoorAtlas vs Foursquare Places API
- IndoorAtlas vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- IndoorAtlas vs Fused
- IndoorAtlas vs Geoapify
- IndoorAtlas vs Google Maps
- QGIS vs Mappedin
- QGIS vs Esri ArcGIS
- QGIS vs CesiumJS
- QGIS vs SW Maps
- QGIS vs Felt
- QGIS vs Leica Infinity
- QGIS vs Navmii GPS
- QGIS vs Transit
- QGIS vs Mapbox
- QGIS vs Google Maps Platform
- QGIS vs LocationIQ
- QGIS vs Lonboard
- QGIS vs Mapillary
- QGIS vs MapQuest
- QGIS vs MAPS.ME
- QGIS vs Mapzen
- QGIS vs ArcGIS Survey123
- QGIS vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- QGIS vs GRASS GIS
- QGIS vs WhiteboxTools
- QGIS vs Global Mapper
- QGIS vs SAGA GIS
- QGIS vs Agisoft Metashape
- QGIS vs Atlas.co
- QGIS vs Emlid Studio
- QGIS vs Leaflet
- QGIS vs Potree
- QGIS vs Foursquare Places API
- QGIS vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- QGIS vs Fused
- QGIS vs Geoapify
- QGIS vs Google Maps
